defendant to prepare defense (Idaho) · Go Syfert
← Idaho issues

defendant to prepare defense in Idaho

6 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1980–1996 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Gummgreen
idaho · 1978 · cited in 2 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 1980–1995
2 sentences

1995See, e.g., State v. Gumm, 99 Idaho 549 , 585 P.2d 959 (1978).

1995See, e.g., State v. Gumm, 99 Idaho 549 , 585 P.2d 959 (1978).

22
State v. Robertsgreen
idaho · 1980 · cited in 3 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 1990–1996
2 sentences

1991In State v. Roberts, 101 Idaho 199 , 610 P.2d 558 (1980), our Supreme Court stated that because “time is not a material ingredient in the offense of lewd and lascivious conduct with a minor, the Information need only be specific enough to enable the defendant to prepare his defense and to protect him from being subsequently prosecuted for the same offense.” (Citations omitted.) Id. at 200 , 610 P.2d at 559 .

1991In State v. Roberts, 101 Idaho 199 , 610 P.2d 558 (1980), our Supreme Court stated that because “time is not a material ingredient in the offense of lewd and lascivious conduct with a minor, the Information need only be specific enough to enable the defendant to prepare his defense and to protect him from being subsequently prosecuted for the same offense.” (Citations omitted.) Id. at 200 , 610 P.2d at 559 .

13
State v. Darbingreen
idahoctapp · 1985 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 1989–1989
2 sentences

1989State v. Darbin, 109 Idaho 516, 519 , 708 P.2d 921, 924 (Ct.App.1985); U.S.CONST. amend.

1989State v. Darbin, 109 Idaho 516, 519 , 708 P.2d 921, 924 (Ct.App.1985); U.S.CONST. amend.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Dwayne Noble Banks green
idahoctapp · 1987
2 sentences

1996Roberts, 101 Idaho at 200 , 610 P.2d at 559 ; State v. Banks, 113 Idaho 54 , 740 P.2d 1039 (Ct.App.1987).

1996Roberts, 101 Idaho at 200 , 610 P.2d at 559 ; State v. Banks, 113 Idaho 54 , 740 P.2d 1039 (Ct.App.1987).

11996–1996
State v. Wonser green
kan · 1975
2 sentences

1980I.C. § 19-1414 provides that “[t]he precise time at which the offense was committed need not be stated in the indictment; but it may be alleged to have been committed at any time before the finding thereof, except where the time is a material ingredient in the offense.” Since time is not a material ingredient in the offense of lewd and lascivious conduct with a minor, see, e. g., State v. Wonser, 217 Kan. 406 , 537 P.2d 197 (1975), the information need only be specific enough to enable the defendant to prepare his defense and to protect him from being subsequently prosecuted for the same offen

1980I.C. § 19-1414 provides that “[t]he precise time at which the offense was committed need not be stated in the indictment; but it may be alleged to have been committed at any time before the finding thereof, except where the time is a material ingredient in the offense.” Since time is not a material ingredient in the offense of lewd and lascivious conduct with a minor, see, e. g., State v. Wonser, 217 Kan. 406 , 537 P.2d 197 (1975), the information need only be specific enough to enable the defendant to prepare his defense and to protect him from being subsequently prosecuted for the same offen

11980–1980

Statutes the citing opinions construe

ID § Idaho Code § 19-1414 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

PA 71 (1900–2026) TX 64 (1973–2026) IL 54 (1953–2024) WA 53 (1896–2025) MO 43 (1912–2025) NC 41 (1958–2026) NY 34 (1908–2025) GA 30 (1918–2024) LA 18 (1939–2025) CO 17 (1979–2026) CA 12 (1887–2025) CT 11 (1962–2017) WY 10 (1926–2022) TN 9 (1985–2019) MS 9 (1997–2008) OR 9 (1963–2017) AZ 8 (1919–2022) ID 6 (1980–1996) NH 6 (1984–2011) FL 6 (1937–2009) UT 6 (1948–2026) ND 6 (1995–2021) OH 5 (1961–2022) KS 5 (1886–2018) MN 5 (1921–2015) WI 4 (1988–2022) IN 4 (1980–2020) MT 4 (1965–2023) AL 4 (1963–1990) MI 4 (1916–1995) NJ 3 (1959–2026) VA 3 (1961–2002) DE 3 (2022–2024) ME 3 (1984–1990) NM 3 (1966–2021) MD 3 (1983–2013) MA 2 (1991–1992) VT 2 (1999–2020) WV 2 (1992–1999) IA 2 (2001–2016) VI 2 (2013–2015) AR 2 (1884–1931)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check