Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1978–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Davisgreen2 sentences2015The extension of the judicial notice doctrine to include “facts which, while not generally known, are readily verifiable from sources of indisputable accuracy is an important aid in the efficient disposition of litigation, and its use, where appropriate, is to be commended.” People v. Davis, 65 Ill. 2d 157, 165 (1976). 2014Moreover, because defendant's status does not fall squarely within the judicially noticeable category of facts "capable of immediate and accurate demonstration by resort to easily accessible sources of indisputable accuracy[]" (People v. Davis, 65 Ill. 2d 157, 165 (1976)), I reject any application of the doctrine of judicial notice. 9 I do not discuss the performance prong of Strickland as I dispose of this issue on the prejudice prong alone. 25 ¶ 68 I also reject the conclusion that section 1227(a)(2)(C) of Title 8 commands removal (deportation) a "clear consequence" if a defendant is convict | 2 | 3 |
Chicago Limousine Service, Inc. v. City of Chicagogreen1 sentence2017See Chicago Limousine Service, 335 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Hill
green
1 sentence2015Furthermore, “[a] court may take judicial notice of a fact even if it constitutes an element of the offense.” Hill, 409 Ill. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Murdy v. Edgar
green
2 sentences1993Judicial notice may be taken of scientific principles and authoritative treatises that are generally known and accepted or "readily verifiable from sources of indisputable accuracy.” (See Murdy v. Edgar (1984), 103 Ill. 2d 384, 394 , 469 N.E.2d 1085 .) Because we conclude that the "scientific principle” cited by defendant is not relevant to the determination of this case, we need not reach the question whether it is known or verifiable from accurate sources. 1993Judicial notice may be taken of scientific principles and authoritative treatises that are generally known and accepted or "readily verifiable from sources of indisputable accuracy.” (See Murdy v. Edgar (1984), 103 Ill. 2d 384, 394 , 469 N.E.2d 1085 .) Because we conclude that the "scientific principle” cited by defendant is not relevant to the determination of this case, we need not reach the question whether it is known or verifiable from accurate sources. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
In Re Brown
green
2 sentences1978In the recent case of In re Brown (1978), 71 Ill. 2d 151 , 374 N.E.2d 209 , our supreme court again asserted the position it had taken in the Davis case as to the doctrine of judicial notice. 1978In the recent case of In re Brown (1978), 71 Ill. 2d 151 , 374 N.E.2d 209 , our supreme court again asserted the position it had taken in the Davis case as to the doctrine of judicial notice. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.