6 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1970–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Willsey v. Stategreen1 sentence2018Willsey v. State, 698 N.E.2d 784, 791-92 (Ind. 1998) (citing, inter alia, Doyle v. Ohio, 426 U.S. 610 (1976), and Wainwright v. Greenfield, 474 U.S. 284 (1986)). | 1 | 1 |
Bible v. Stategreen2 sentences1970See Bible v. State (1970), 253 Ind. 373 , 254 N. E. 2d 319 . 1970See Bible v. State (1970), 253 Ind. 373 , 254 N. E. 2d 319 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Doyle v. Ohio
green
1 sentence2018Willsey v. State, 698 N.E.2d 784, 791-92 (Ind. 1998) (citing, inter alia, Doyle v. Ohio, 426 U.S. 610 (1976), and Wainwright v. Greenfield, 474 U.S. 284 (1986)). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Wainwright v. Greenfield
green
1 sentence2018Willsey v. State, 698 N.E.2d 784, 791-92 (Ind. 1998) (citing, inter alia, Doyle v. Ohio, 426 U.S. 610 (1976), and Wainwright v. Greenfield, 474 U.S. 284 (1986)). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
ST v. State
green
1 sentence2017However, in S.T. v. State, 764 N.E.2d 632 (Ind. 2002), our supreme court applied the Strickland ineffective assistance of counsel standard in a juvenile delinquency adjudication. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Beck v. Alabama
green
2 sentences1989I write separately to describe why I believe that the trial court's refusal of Underwood's instruction on the lesser included offense of battery does not contravene the fourteenth amendment due process clause as interpreted in Beck v. Alabama, 447 U.S. 625 , 100 S.Ct. 2382 , 65 L.Ed.2d 392 (1980). 1989I write separately to describe why I believe that the trial court's refusal of Underwood's instruction on the lesser included offense of battery does not contravene the fourteenth amendment due process clause as interpreted in Beck v. Alabama, 447 U.S. 625 , 100 S.Ct. 2382 , 65 L.Ed.2d 392 (1980). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Klopfer v. North Carolina
green
2 sentences1986Klopfer v. North Carolina (1967), 386 U.S. 213 , 87 S.Ct. 988 , 18 LEd.2d 1. 1986Klopfer v. North Carolina (1967), 386 U.S. 213 , 87 S.Ct. 988 , 18 LEd.2d 1. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Mullaney v. Wilbur
green
2 sentences1981The appellant also contends that the instruction on reasonable doubt set out above misstated the law in using the terms “fair, actual and logical doubt.” The use of the term “fair”, he claims, violates the Fourteenth Amendment due process requirement that a state must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, as explained in Mullaney v. Wilbur, (1975) 421 U.S. 684 , 95 S.Ct. 1881 , 44 L.Ed.2d 508 , because it implied that the jury must weigh a doubt *256 rather than resolve it in favor of a defendant. 1981The appellant also contends that the instruction on reasonable doubt set out above misstated the law in using the terms “fair, actual and logical doubt.” The use of the term “fair”, he claims, violates the Fourteenth Amendment due process requirement that a state must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, as explained in Mullaney v. Wilbur, (1975) 421 U.S. 684 , 95 S.Ct. 1881 , 44 L.Ed.2d 508 , because it implied that the jury must weigh a doubt *256 rather than resolve it in favor of a defendant. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.