Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Indiana opinions name it 1 courts 1991–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Loren H. Fry v. State of Indianagreen1 sentence2019See Fry v. State, 25 N.E.3d 237, 243 (Ind. Ct. App. 2015), trans. denied. | 1 | 1 |
Dowdell v. Stategreen1 sentence2015As such, it was not an abuse of discretion for the trial court to decline to accept Morris’s work history as a mitigating factor. [9] Second, the record does not clearly support Morris’s claim that extended incarceration would cause undue hardship on his dependent children. “‘Many persons convicted of serious crimes have one or more children and, absent special circumstances, trial courts are not required to find that imprisonment will result in an undue hardship.’” Dowdell v. State, 720 N.E.2d 1146, 1154 (Ind. 1999). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Morris v. Jones
green
2 sentences2010Id. at 554 , 67 S.Ct. 451 . 2010Id. at 554 , 67 S.Ct. 451 . | 2 | 2010–2010 |
Brenda Sue Gittings and Marc Richmond Gittings v. William H. Deal
green
1 sentence2019Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-PL-2087 | June 14, 2019 Page 7 of 16 set aside the findings only if the record contains no supporting evidence, but we review the court’s legal conclusions de novo.” Id. [13] The trial court found that the Agreements were valid and enforceable; Patton, however, seeks to avoid the enforcement of the Agreements that he entered into with Morris. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
In Re the Wardship of B.C.
green
1 sentence1991She cites the dissent in In re Wardship of B.C. (1982), Ind., 441 N.E.2d 208 , in which Justice Hunter asserted medical evidence “is the only vehicle by which to truly determine whether there is a ‘reasonable probability that the conditions which resulted [in child’s removal] will not be remedied,’ as is required by Ind.Code § 31-6-5-4(2).” Id. at 213. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.