Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1869–2009 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Wyeth v. Levine
green
2 sentences2009The manufacturer argued that the FDCA "establishes both a floor and ceiling ...:[oOInce the FDA has approved a drug's label, a state-law verdict may not deem the label inadequate. ..." Id. 2009The manufacturer argued that the FDCA "establishes both a floor and ceiling ...:[o]nce the FDA has approved a drug's label, a state-law verdict may not deem the label inadequate...." Id. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Stultz v. Stultz
red
1 sentence1995The Court of Appeals held that what it called ""the general statutory prescription" requiring consideration of the standard of living the children would have enjoyed had the parents not divorced "must yield to the specific rule set out in Poynter." Stultz, 644 N.E.2d at 592 n. 1. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
O'Neal v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad
neutral
1 sentence1914Co. (1903), 140 Ala. 378, 386 , 37 South. 275 , 1 Ann. | 1 | 1914–1914 |
Carman v. . Pultz
neutral
1 sentence1893In Rapp v. Kester, 125 Ind. 79 , Coffey, Judge, speaking for the court, says: “Every presumption ■ in favor of the correctness of the rulings of the trial court is indulged in by this court, and unless the record affirmatively discloses an error of which complaint is made, the judgment from which the appeal is prosecuted will be affirmed.” Myers v. Murphy, 60 Ind. 282 ; Carman v. Pultz, 21 N. Y. 547 . | 1 | 1893–1893 |
Myers v. Murphy
green
1 sentence1893In Rapp v. Kester, 125 Ind. 79 , Coffey, Judge, speaking for the court, says: “Every presumption ■ in favor of the correctness of the rulings of the trial court is indulged in by this court, and unless the record affirmatively discloses an error of which complaint is made, the judgment from which the appeal is prosecuted will be affirmed.” Myers v. Murphy, 60 Ind. 282 ; Carman v. Pultz, 21 N. Y. 547 . | 1 | 1893–1893 |
Elmore v. Overton
green
1 sentence1893While it is true that there is a presumption that such a record was made because it ought to have been made (Elmore v. Overton, 104 Ind. 548 ), still there is also a presumption, and this is the stronger presumption, that the action of the trial court was correct. | 1 | 1893–1893 |
Rapp v. Kester
neutral
1 sentence1893In Rapp v. Kester, 125 Ind. 79 , Coffey, Judge, speaking for the court, says: “Every presumption ■ in favor of the correctness of the rulings of the trial court is indulged in by this court, and unless the record affirmatively discloses an error of which complaint is made, the judgment from which the appeal is prosecuted will be affirmed.” Myers v. Murphy, 60 Ind. 282 ; Carman v. Pultz, 21 N. Y. 547 . | 1 | 1893–1893 |
Whitney v. State
neutral
1 sentence1890Statements in the case of Whitney v. State, 35 Ind. 503 , which indicate, or assert, a doctrine Opposed to that stated are not defensible, and can not be approved, .for a stronger rule against the prosecution is there laid down than reason or authority warrants. | 1 | 1890–1890 |
M'Clure v. Bennett
green
1 sentence1869M’Clure v. Bennett, 1 Blackf. 189 , followed by Mectrs v. Graham, 8 Blackf. 144 , and Potts v. Henderson, 2 Ind. 327 . | 1 | 1869–1869 |
Mears v. Graham
green
1 sentence1869M’Clure v. Bennett, 1 Blackf. 189 , followed by Mectrs v. Graham, 8 Blackf. 144 , and Potts v. Henderson, 2 Ind. 327 . | 1 | 1869–1869 |
Potts v. Henderson
neutral
1 sentence1869M’Clure v. Bennett, 1 Blackf. 189 , followed by Mectrs v. Graham, 8 Blackf. 144 , and Potts v. Henderson, 2 Ind. 327 . | 1 | 1869–1869 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.