person asserting claim (Kansas) · Go Syfert
← Kansas issues

person asserting claim in Kansas

6 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2022 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Staffordgreen
kan · 2012 · cited in 1 Kansas opinions naming this issue, 2022–2022
2 sentences

2022See State v. Stafford, 296 Kan. 25, 45 , 290 P.3d 562 (2012). 3 Woods committed the crimes at issue in this appeal in June and September 2019— which results in two different statutory versions governing his probation revocations.

2022See State v. Stafford, 296 Kan. 25, 45 , 290 P.3d 562 (2012). 3 Woods committed the crimes at issue in this appeal in June and September 2019— which results in two different statutory versions governing his probation revocations.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
Hendrix Ex Rel. Smith v. City of Topeka green
kan · 1982
2 sentences

2019As the district judge noted when dismissing this lawsuit, the Robertson opinion stated: "Even with the advent of notice pleading, it is incumbent upon a person asserting a claim against a public officer to make at least some allegation which, if true, would tend to establish that immunity was not a bar to the claim." Robertson, 231 Kan. at 359 (citing Hendrix v. City of Topeka, 231 Kan. 113 , Syl. ¶ 5, 643 P.2d 129 [1982]).

2019As the district judge noted when dismissing this lawsuit, the Robertson opinion stated: "Even with the advent of notice pleading, it is incumbent upon a person asserting a claim against a public officer to make at least some allegation which, if true, would tend to establish that immunity was not a bar to the claim." Robertson, 231 Kan. at 359 (citing Hendrix v. City of Topeka, 231 Kan. 113 , Syl. ¶ 5, 643 P.2d 129 [1982]).

21982–2019
Baker v. Hayden green
kan · 2021
1 sentence

2022Baker v. Hayden, 313 Kan. 667 , 673, 490 P.3d 1164 (2021).

12022–2022
Soto v. City of Bonner Springs green
kan · 2010
1 sentence

2019But we have recently held that a "governmental entity bears the burden to establish immunity under the exceptions of the Kansas Tort Claims Act." Soto, 291 Kan. 73 , Syl. ¶ 5.

12019–2019
Robertson v. City of Topeka green
kan · 1982
1 sentence

2019As the district judge noted when dismissing this lawsuit, the Robertson opinion stated: "Even with the advent of notice pleading, it is incumbent upon a person asserting a claim against a public officer to make at least some allegation which, if true, would tend to establish that immunity was not a bar to the claim." Robertson, 231 Kan. at 359 (citing Hendrix v. City of Topeka, 231 Kan. 113 , Syl. ¶ 5, 643 P.2d 129 [1982]).

12019–2019
In Re Tax Appeal of Ford Motor Credit Co. green
kan · 2003
2 sentences

2012The burden of proof is on the person asserting a claim for refund to bring himself or herself within the refund statute.” In re Tax Appeal of Ford Motor Credit Co., 275 Kan. 857, 861 , 69 P.3d 612 (2003).

2012The burden of proof is on the person asserting a claim for refund to bring himself or herself within the refund statute.” In re Tax Appeal of Ford Motor Credit Co., 275 Kan. 857, 861 , 69 P.3d 612 (2003).

12012–2012
In Re Tax Appeal of Collingwood Grain, Inc. green
kan · 1995
2 sentences

2003In re Tax Appeal of Collingwood Grain, Inc., 257 Kan. 237, 246 , 891 P.2d 422 (1995).

2003In re Tax Appeal of Collingwood Grain, Inc., 257 Kan. 237, 246 , 891 P.2d 422 (1995).

12003–2003

Where else courts name it

OH 94 (1966–2025) CO 28 (1970–2026) TX 28 (1931–2026) PA 24 (1957–2024) ID 14 (1975–2017) CA 14 (1951–2025) NY 11 (1890–2026) GA 10 (1976–2025) MI 9 (1955–2017) NJ 7 (1985–2020) IN 7 (1978–2025) WI 7 (1996–2025) IL 7 (1957–2014) MD 6 (1970–2004) KS 6 (1982–2022) MO 6 (1961–2023) WV 6 (1948–2011) NC 5 (2014–2022) UT 5 (1984–2014) MN 5 (1983–2025) AL 4 (1914–2014) AR 4 (1892–1994) AZ 4 (1921–2026) ME 4 (1982–2025) WA 4 (1974–2024) CT 4 (1992–2019) NE 3 (1927–2017) LA 3 (1983–2015) VA 3 (1992–2003) IA 3 (1986–2011) VT 2 (1914–2020) ND 2 (1911–2010) OR 2 (1974–1976) DC 2 (1987–2003) HI 2 (2001–2006) MA 2 (2003–2015) SD 2 (2005–2014) DE 2 (1970–2017) SC 2 (1984–2003) NV 2 (2017–2017) MT 2 (1994–1998)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check