6 Maryland opinions name it 1 courts 1970–2004 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Schmerber v. Californiagreen1 sentence1970See Schmerber v. California, 384 U. S. 757 , 761 and note 5. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Katz v. United States
green
2 sentences2004Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347, 361 , 88 S.Ct. 507 , 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967) (Harlan, J., concurring). 2004Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347, 361 , 88 S.Ct. 507 , 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967) (Harlan, J., concurring). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Fisher v. United States
green
2 sentences2003For support, the Court pointed to the constitutional language itself, i.e., no person shall “be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself,” and case law reiterating that the Fifth Amendment only prohibits “the use of ‘physical or moral compulsion’ exerted on the person asserting the privilege.” Id. at 562 , 103 S.Ct. 916 (quoting Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 397 , 96 S.Ct. 1569 , 48 L.Ed.2d 39 (1976)). 2003For support, the Court pointed to the constitutional language itself, i.e., no person shall “be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself,” and case law reiterating that the Fifth Amendment only prohibits “the use of ‘physical or moral compulsion’ exerted on the person asserting the privilege.” Id. at 562 , 103 S.Ct. 916 (quoting Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 397 , 96 S.Ct. 1569 , 48 L.Ed.2d 39 (1976)). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
South Dakota v. Neville
green
2 sentences2003For support, the Court pointed to the constitutional language itself, i.e., no person shall “be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself,” and case law reiterating that the Fifth Amendment only prohibits “the use of ‘physical or moral compulsion’ exerted on the person asserting the privilege.” Id. at 562 , 103 S.Ct. 916 (quoting Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 397 , 96 S.Ct. 1569 , 48 L.Ed.2d 39 (1976)). 2003For support, the Court pointed to the constitutional language itself, i.e., no person shall “be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself,” and case law reiterating that the Fifth Amendment only prohibits “the use of ‘physical or moral compulsion’ exerted on the person asserting the privilege.” Id. at 562 , 103 S.Ct. 916 (quoting Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 397 , 96 S.Ct. 1569 , 48 L.Ed.2d 39 (1976)). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Tatum v. Gigliotti
green
2 sentences1999Appellees support their argument with this Court’s decision in Tatum v. Gigliotti, 80 Md.App. 559 , 565 A.2d 354 (1989), aff'd, 321 Md. 623 , 583 A.2d 1062 (1991). 1999Appellees support their argument with this Court’s decision in Tatum v. Gigliotti, 80 Md.App. 559 , 565 A.2d 354 (1989), aff'd, 321 Md. 623 , 583 A.2d 1062 (1991). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Tatum v. Gigliotti
green
2 sentences1999Appellees support their argument with this Court’s decision in Tatum v. Gigliotti, 80 Md.App. 559 , 565 A.2d 354 (1989), aff'd, 321 Md. 623 , 583 A.2d 1062 (1991). 1999Appellees support their argument with this Court’s decision in Tatum v. Gigliotti, 80 Md.App. 559 , 565 A.2d 354 (1989), aff'd, 321 Md. 623 , 583 A.2d 1062 (1991). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
United States v. Doe
green
2 sentences1998In United States v. Doe, 465 U.S. 605, 610-11 , 104 S.Ct. 1237, 1241 , 79 L.Ed.2d 552 (1984), the Supreme Court reconfirmed its holding in Fisher that the Fifth Amendment privilege is not involved unless the element of compulsion and the testimonial element coincide in time: [T]he Fifth Amendment only protects the person asserting the privilege from compelled self-incrimination Where the preparation of business records is voluntary, no compulsion is present. 1998In United States v. Doe, 465 U.S. 605, 610-11 , 104 S.Ct. 1237, 1241 , 79 L.Ed.2d 552 (1984), the Supreme Court reconfirmed its holding in Fisher that the Fifth Amendment privilege is not involved unless the element of compulsion and the testimonial element coincide in time: [T]he Fifth Amendment only protects the person asserting the privilege from compelled self-incrimination Where the preparation of business records is voluntary, no compulsion is present. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Harlow v. Fitzgerald
green
2 sentences1994The pertinent question is, whether the person asserting immunity was “performing acts legislative in nature.” Harlow, 457 U.S. at 810 , 102 S.Ct. at 2734 . 1994The pertinent question is, whether the person asserting immunity was “performing acts legislative in nature.” Harlow, 457 U.S. at 810 , 102 S.Ct. at 2734 . | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Doe v. McMillan
green
2 sentences1994Thus, the “starting point is at least a minimum familiarity with the [appellees’] functions and duties.” Doe, 412 U.S. at 320 , 93 S.Ct. at 2029 . 1994Thus, the “starting point is at least a minimum familiarity with the [appellees’] functions and duties.” Doe, 412 U.S. at 320 , 93 S.Ct. at 2029 . | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.