6 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 2007–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Russogreen2 sentences2020See Vakas v. Kansas Bd. of Healing Arts, 248 Kan. 589, 600 , 808 P.2d 1355 (1991) (adopting eight factors from State v. Russo, 230 Kan. 5, 9 , 630 P.2d 711 [1981], and noting reinstatement "'must be made on a case by case basis depending upon the facts involved'") (quoting Russo, 230 Kan. at 12 ). 2020See Vakas v. Kansas Bd. of Healing Arts, 248 Kan. 589, 600 , 808 P.2d 1355 (1991) (adopting eight factors from State v. Russo, 230 Kan. 5, 9 , 630 P.2d 711 [1981], and noting reinstatement "'must be made on a case by case basis depending upon the facts involved'") (quoting Russo, 230 Kan. at 12 ). | 1 | 1 |
Vakas v. Kansas Board of Healing Artsgreen2 sentences2020See Vakas v. Kansas Bd. of Healing Arts, 248 Kan. 589, 600 , 808 P.2d 1355 (1991) (adopting eight factors from State v. Russo, 230 Kan. 5, 9 , 630 P.2d 711 [1981], and noting reinstatement "'must be made on a case by case basis depending upon the facts involved'") (quoting Russo, 230 Kan. at 12 ). 2020See Vakas v. Kansas Bd. of Healing Arts, 248 Kan. 589, 600 , 808 P.2d 1355 (1991) (adopting eight factors from State v. Russo, 230 Kan. 5, 9 , 630 P.2d 711 [1981], and noting reinstatement "'must be made on a case by case basis depending upon the facts involved'") (quoting Russo, 230 Kan. at 12 ). | 1 | 1 |
State v. WARRIORgreen1 sentence2019See Warrior , 294 Kan. at 496 -97 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Fernandez-Torres – (green1 sentence2019As we outlined in Horn I : "Among the factors the district court may consider are: '(1) the accused's mental condition; (2) the duration and manner of the interrogation; (3) the ability of the accused on request to communicate with the outside world; (4) the accused's age, intellect, and background; (5) the fairness of the officers in conducting the interrogation; and (6) the accused's fluency with the English language.' State v. Gilliland , 294 Kan. 519 , Syl. ¶ 3, 276 P.3d 165 (2012) ; see also Fernandez-Torres , 50 Kan. | 1 | 1 |
Consolidated Brokers Insurance Services, Inc. v. Pan-American Assurance Co.green1 sentence2009Synthesizing the federal caselaw, the Kansas federal court recently oudined a set of factors to consider in determining whether to compel arbitration of a dispute arising under an agreement that has no arbitration clause when a related contract contains a broad provision to compel arbitration: “(1) whether the agreements incorporate or reference each other; (2) whether the agreements are dependent on each other or relate to the same subject matter; (3) whether the arbitration clause specifically excludes certain claims; (4) whether the agreements are executed closely in time and by the same pa | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Irvin Ex Rel. Irvin v. Smith
green
1 sentence2023A doctor-patient relationship—and potential liability for malpractice—exists when the doctor "assumes the role of treating the patient." 272 Kan. at 120 . 9 But the court did not attempt to forge those observations into a set of factors or a predictive legal test. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
State v. Gilliland
green
2 sentences2019As we outlined in Horn I : "Among the factors the district court may consider are: '(1) the accused's mental condition; (2) the duration and manner of the interrogation; (3) the ability of the accused on request to communicate with the outside world; (4) the accused's age, intellect, and background; (5) the fairness of the officers in conducting the interrogation; and (6) the accused's fluency with the English language.' State v. Gilliland , 294 Kan. 519 , Syl. ¶ 3, 276 P.3d 165 (2012) ; see also Fernandez-Torres , 50 Kan. 2019As we outlined in Horn I : "Among the factors the district court may consider are: '(1) the accused's mental condition; (2) the duration and manner of the interrogation; (3) the ability of the accused on request to communicate with the outside world; (4) the accused's age, intellect, and background; (5) the fairness of the officers in conducting the interrogation; and (6) the accused's fluency with the English language.' State v. Gilliland , 294 Kan. 519 , Syl. ¶ 3, 276 P.3d 165 (2012) ; see also Fernandez-Torres , 50 Kan. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Egelhoff v. Egelhoff Ex Rel. Breiner
green
2 sentences2007One of the primary reasons for Congress’ adoption of such a broad-sweeping statute was “to enable employers To establish a uniform administrative scheme, which provides a set of standard procedures to guide processing of claims and disbursement of benefits.’ ” Egelhoff v. Egelhoff, 532 U.S. 141, 148 , 149 L. 2007One of the primary reasons for Congress’ adoption of such a broad-sweeping statute was “to enable employers To establish a uniform administrative scheme, which provides a set of standard procedures to guide processing of claims and disbursement of benefits.’ ” Egelhoff v. Egelhoff, 532 U.S. 141, 148 , 149 L. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. Coyne
green
2 sentences2007Ed. 2d 264 , 121 S. Ct. 1322 (2001) (quoting Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. Coyne, 482 U.S. 1, 9 , 96 L. 2007Ed. 2d 264 , 121 S. Ct. 1322 (2001) (quoting Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. Coyne, 482 U.S. 1, 9 , 96 L. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.