6 Wyoming opinions name it 1 courts 1987–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wyoming courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In the Interest Of: RR, KR and RR, Minor Children, FR v. The State of Wyominggreen2 sentences2022The court set the hearing for September 18, but, in response to two separate requests from Mother, continued it to November 25, 2020 and then to January 13, 2021. 6 STANDARD OF REVIEW [¶25] To change a permanency plan “from family reunification to adoption, a juvenile court must find that [the Department] made reasonable efforts to achieve reunification without success and that reunification is no longer in the children’s best interest.” Interest of RR, 2021 WY 85, ¶ 97 , 492 P.3d 246, 270 (Wyo. 2021) (citing Interest of SW, 2021 WY 81, ¶ 17 , 491 P.3d 264 , 269 (Wyo. 2021)). 2022The court set the hearing for September 18, but, in response to two separate requests from Mother, continued it to November 25, 2020 and then to January 13, 2021. 6 STANDARD OF REVIEW [¶25] To change a permanency plan “from family reunification to adoption, a juvenile court must find that [the Department] made reasonable efforts to achieve reunification without success and that reunification is no longer in the children’s best interest.” Interest of RR, 2021 WY 85, ¶ 97 , 492 P.3d 246, 270 (Wyo. 2021) (citing Interest of SW, 2021 WY 81, ¶ 17 , 491 P.3d 264 , 269 (Wyo. 2021)). | 1 | 1 |
Marceaux v. Gibbsgreen2 sentences2003In the case, Marceaux v. Gibbs, 699 So.2d 1065, 1069-70 (La.1997), the court set this standard for such cases: In order to recover for injuries caused by an escaped prisoner, an injured plaintiff must prove the following: (1) negligence on the part of the custodian in managing the facility; (2) that this negligence facilitated the escape; (3) that the escapee's actions caused the harm complained of; and, (4) that the risk of harm encountered by the plaintiff falls within the scope of duty owed by the custodian. 2003In the case, Marceaux v. Gibbs, 699 So.2d 1065, 1069-70 (La.1997), the court set this standard for such cases: In order to recover for injuries caused by an escaped prisoner, an injured plaintiff must prove the following: (1) negligence on the part of the custodian in managing the facility; (2) that this negligence facilitated the escape; (8) that the escapee's actions caused the harm complained of; and, (4) that the risk of harm encountered by the plaintiff falls within the seope of duty owed by the custodian. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wyoming. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. John Allen Powers William Nichols, Contemnor/appellant
green
2 sentences1987The defendant's attorney asked for a clarification of the court's contempt powers, and the court stated: "`The [c]ourt notifies the defendant that the court would incarcerate the defendant for the balance of the trial and set a hearing date regarding the contempt charges and possible sentence as a result thereof.'" Id. at 621 . 1987The defendant’s attorney asked for a clarification of the court’s contempt powers, and the court stated: “ ‘The- [cjourt notifies the defendant that the court would incarcerate the defendant for the balance of the trial and set a hearing date regarding the contempt charges and possible sentence as a result thereof.’ ” Id. at 621 . | 2 | 1987–1987 |
In the Interest of: SW, CW, HW and NW, minor children, KM v. The State of Wyoming
green
1 sentence2022The court set the hearing for September 18, but, in response to two separate requests from Mother, continued it to November 25, 2020 and then to January 13, 2021. 6 STANDARD OF REVIEW [¶25] To change a permanency plan “from family reunification to adoption, a juvenile court must find that [the Department] made reasonable efforts to achieve reunification without success and that reunification is no longer in the children’s best interest.” Interest of RR, 2021 WY 85, ¶ 97 , 492 P.3d 246, 270 (Wyo. 2021) (citing Interest of SW, 2021 WY 81, ¶ 17 , 491 P.3d 264 , 269 (Wyo. 2021)). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
People v. Hyatt
green
1 sentence2018Miller and Montgomery "make clear that sentencing a juvenile to life without parole is more than a simple consideration of a set of factors." Hyatt , 891 N.W.2d at 579 . | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Bishop v. State
green
1 sentence1987In Bishop v. State, supra, 687 P.2d at 246 , this court adopted from United States v. Myers, 550 F.2d 1036 (5th Cir.1977), appeal after remand 572 F.2d 506 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied 439 U.S. 847 , 99 S.Ct. 147 , 58 L.Ed.2d 149 (1978), a set of factors to apply with respect to evidence of other crimes. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
United States v. Larry Allen Myers
green
2 sentences1987In Bishop v. State, supra, 687 P.2d at 246 , this court adopted from United States v. Myers, 550 F.2d 1036 (5th Cir.1977), appeal after remand 572 F.2d 506 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied 439 U.S. 847 , 99 S.Ct. 147 , 58 L.Ed.2d 149 (1978), a set of factors to apply with respect to evidence of other crimes. 1987Those factors are: “ ‘(1) The proof of the other similar crimes must be plain, clear, and convincing. “ ‘(2) The other crimes must not be too remote in time from the charged offense. “ ‘(3) The evidence of the other crimes must be introduced for a purpose sanctioned by Rule 404(b) of the Federal Rules of Evidence. “ ‘(4) The element of the charged offense that the evidence of other crimes is introduced to prove must be a material issue in the case. “ ‘(5) There must be a substantial need for the probative value of the evidence of the other crimes.’ United States v. Myers, supra, [ 550 F.2d 103 | 1 | 1987–1987 |
United States v. Larry Allen Myers
green
1 sentence1987In Bishop v. State, supra, 687 P.2d at 246 , this court adopted from United States v. Myers, 550 F.2d 1036 (5th Cir.1977), appeal after remand 572 F.2d 506 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied 439 U.S. 847 , 99 S.Ct. 147 , 58 L.Ed.2d 149 (1978), a set of factors to apply with respect to evidence of other crimes. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Payton v. Payton
green
1 sentence1987In Bishop v. State, supra, 687 P.2d at 246 , this court adopted from United States v. Myers, 550 F.2d 1036 (5th Cir.1977), appeal after remand 572 F.2d 506 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied 439 U.S. 847 , 99 S.Ct. 147 , 58 L.Ed.2d 149 (1978), a set of factors to apply with respect to evidence of other crimes. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Franklin v. Crosby Typesetting Co.
green
1 sentence1987In Bishop v. State, supra, 687 P.2d at 246 , this court adopted from United States v. Myers, 550 F.2d 1036 (5th Cir.1977), appeal after remand 572 F.2d 506 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied 439 U.S. 847 , 99 S.Ct. 147 , 58 L.Ed.2d 149 (1978), a set of factors to apply with respect to evidence of other crimes. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.