Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 1956–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. McDanielgreen2 sentences2016Courts allow a wide range of inquiry on cross- examination, particularly when “there is a sharp conflict in the evidence . . . [and] the credibility of the defendant and complainant are critical.” State v. McDaniel, 534 N.W.2d 290, 293 (Minn. App. 1995), review denied (Minn. Sept. 20, 1995). 2011Evid. 611(b) (stating that “[c]ross-examination should be limited to the subject matter of the direct examination and matters affecting the credibility of the witness ” (emphasis added)); see also State v. McDaniel, 534 N.W.2d 290, 293 (Minn.App.1995) (stating that courts generally allow a wide range of inquiry on cross-examination, particularly where there is a sharp conflict in the evidence and credibility is critical), review denied (Minn. Sept. 20, 1995). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Browngreen1 sentence2011A witness’s possible gang membership has been held relevant to show bias. [Gary] Brown, 455 N.W.2d at 69 (involving the critical question at trial about whether appellant had the requisite intent and premeditation to support a determination that he attempted first-degree murder and stating that possible gang membership of various witnesses would speak to their bias, such that preclusion of testimony on this issue was error). | 1 | 1 |
Crawford v. Washingtongreen2 sentences2006Evid. 702; Murray v. Walter, 269 N.W.2d 47, 49 (Minn.1978) (discussing the importance of a wide range of inquiry on cross examination); see also Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 61 , 124 S.Ct. 1354 , 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004) (Thomas, J., concurring) (stating that testimony must be subject to “testing in the crucible of cross-examination”). 2006Evid. 702; Murray v. Walter, 269 N.W.2d 47, 49 (Minn.1978) (discussing the importance of a wide range of inquiry on cross examination); see also Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 61 , 124 S.Ct. 1354 , 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004) (Thomas, J., concurring) (stating that testimony must be subject to “testing in the crucible of cross-examination”). | 1 | 1 |
Murray v. Waltergreen1 sentence2006Evid. 702; Murray v. Walter, 269 N.W.2d 47, 49 (Minn.1978) (discussing the importance of a wide range of inquiry on cross examination); see also Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 61 , 124 S.Ct. 1354 , 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004) (Thomas, J., concurring) (stating that testimony must be subject to “testing in the crucible of cross-examination”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Buck v. Davis
green
2 sentences2019In determining whether extraordinary circumstances exist, a court "may consider a wide range of factors," including " 'the risk of injustice to the parties' and 'the risk of undermining the public's confidence in the judicial process.' " Buck v. Davis , --- U.S. ----, 137 S. Ct. 759 , 777-78, 197 L.Ed.2d 1 (2017) (quoting Liljeberg , 486 U.S. at 863 -64 , 108 S. Ct. at 2204 ). 2019In determining whether extraordinary circumstances exist, a court "may consider a wide range of factors," including " 'the risk of injustice to the parties' and 'the risk of undermining the public's confidence in the judicial process.' " Buck v. Davis , --- U.S. ----, 137 S. Ct. 759 , 777-78, 197 L.Ed.2d 1 (2017) (quoting Liljeberg , 486 U.S. at 863 -64 , 108 S. Ct. at 2204 ). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.
green
2 sentences2019In determining whether extraordinary circumstances exist, a court "may consider a wide range of factors," including " 'the risk of injustice to the parties' and 'the risk of undermining the public's confidence in the judicial process.' " Buck v. Davis , --- U.S. ----, 137 S. Ct. 759 , 777-78, 197 L.Ed.2d 1 (2017) (quoting Liljeberg , 486 U.S. at 863 -64 , 108 S. Ct. at 2204 ). 2019In determining whether extraordinary circumstances exist, a court "may consider a wide range of factors," including " 'the risk of injustice to the parties' and 'the risk of undermining the public's confidence in the judicial process.' " Buck v. Davis , --- U.S. ----, 137 S. Ct. 759 , 777-78, 197 L.Ed.2d 1 (2017) (quoting Liljeberg , 486 U.S. at 863 -64 , 108 S. Ct. at 2204 ). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Farrell v. County of Sibley
green
2 sentences1975The decision in this case is analogous to decisions regarding changes in school district boundaries, Farrell v. County of Sibley, 135 Minn. 439 , 161 N. W. 152 (1917), or the apportionment of taxes and assessments, Village of Edina v. Joseph, supra. Since the acquisition decision is discretionary with the Coun *433 cil, there must be a determination by the Council that the facilities are needed for the metropolitan sewer system. 1975The decision in this case is analogous to decisions regarding changes in school district boundaries, Farrell v. County of Sibley, 135 Minn. 439 , 161 N. W. 152 (1917), or the apportionment of taxes and assessments, Village of Edina v. Joseph, supra. Since the acquisition decision is discretionary with the Coun *433 cil, there must be a determination by the Council that the facilities are needed for the metropolitan sewer system. | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Mattfeld v. Nester
green
2 sentences1956Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106 , 32 N. W. (2d) 291 , 3 A. L. 1956Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106 , 32 N. W. (2d) 291 , 3 A. L. | 1 | 1956–1956 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.