Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Mississippi opinions name it 1 courts 1977–2005 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Pharr v. Stategreen1 sentence1986As to the denial of a motion for a new trial, this Court enunciated the rule in Pharr v. State, 465 So.2d 294, 302 (Miss. 1984): Under our established case law, the trial judge should set aside a jury's verdict only when, in the exercise of his sound discretion, he is convinced that the verdict is contrary to the substantial weight of the evidence. | 1 | 1 |
May v. Stategreen1 sentence1986May v. State, 460 So.2d 778, 781 (Miss. 1984); Pearson v. State, 428 So.2d [1361] at 1364 [(Miss. 1983)]. | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Classicgreen2 sentences1977Compare United States v. Classic, 313 U.S. 299 , 61 S.Ct. 1031 , 85 L.Ed. 1368 ; Ex parte Yarbrough, 110 U.S. 651 , 4 S.Ct. 152 , 28 L.Ed. 274 . `In other words, the privilege to vote in a state is within the *1002 jurisdiction of the state itself, to be exercised as the state may direct, and upon such terms as to it may seem proper, provided, of course, no discrimination is made between individuals, in violation of the Federal Constitution.' Pope v. Williams, supra, 193 U.S. [621] at 632, 24 S.Ct. at [573] 575, [ 48 L.Ed. 817 ]. ( 380 U.S. at 91 , 85 S.Ct. at 777, 778 , 13 L.Ed.2d at 677, 678 1977Compare United States v. Classic, 313 U.S. 299 , 61 S.Ct. 1031 , 85 L.Ed. 1368 ; Ex parte Yarbrough, 110 U.S. 651 , 4 S.Ct. 152 , 28 L.Ed. 274 . `In other words, the privilege to vote in a state is within the *1002 jurisdiction of the state itself, to be exercised as the state may direct, and upon such terms as to it may seem proper, provided, of course, no discrimination is made between individuals, in violation of the Federal Constitution.' Pope v. Williams, supra, 193 U.S. [621] at 632, 24 S.Ct. at [573] 575, [ 48 L.Ed. 817 ]. ( 380 U.S. at 91 , 85 S.Ct. at 777, 778 , 13 L.Ed.2d at 677, 678 | 1 | 1 |
Carrington v. Rashgreen2 sentences1977In Carrington v. Rash, 380 U.S. 89 , 85 S.Ct. 775 , 13 L.Ed.2d 675 (1965) the Court enunciated this principle in the following language: Indeed, `[t]he States have long been held to have broad powers to determine the conditions under which the right of suffrage may be exercised.' Lassiter v. Northampton County Bd. of Elections, 360 U.S. 45, 50 , 79 S.Ct. 985, 989 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1072 . 1977In Carrington v. Rash, 380 U.S. 89 , 85 S.Ct. 775 , 13 L.Ed.2d 675 (1965) the Court enunciated this principle in the following language: Indeed, `[t]he States have long been held to have broad powers to determine the conditions under which the right of suffrage may be exercised.' Lassiter v. Northampton County Bd. of Elections, 360 U.S. 45, 50 , 79 S.Ct. 985, 989 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1072 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp.
green
2 sentences2005Instead, the court adopted the district court's enunciated standard: "Whether a plaintiff could successfully get to the jury or defeat a motion for summary judgment under such a theory would depend upon the frequency of the use of the product and the regularity or extent of the plaintiff's employment in proximity thereto." Id. at 1162 . 2004Instead, the court adopted the district court's enunciated standard: "Whether a plaintiff could successfully get to the jury or defeat a motion for summary judgment under such a theory would depend upon the frequency of the use of the product and the regularity or extent of the plaintiff's employment in proximity thereto." Id. at 1162 . | 2 | 2004–2005 |
Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.
green
1 sentence1989Id. 485 So.2d at 1038-39 . | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Nichols v. Stacks
green
1 sentence1989Id. 485 So.2d at 1038-39 . | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Cain v. Mid-South Pump Co.
green
1 sentence1986Since, concededly, the best the plaintiffs or anyone else will be able to do under the circumstances of this case can be no more than a "fair and reasonable estimate," Cain, supra, or a "just and reasonable inference," Story Parchment, supra, the weight, credibility and worth of the comparative measurement or measurements and calculations upon rehearing in determining the amount of the monetary award will rest solely with the chancellor. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Ex Parte Yarbrough
green
2 sentences1977Compare United States v. Classic, 313 U.S. 299 , 61 S.Ct. 1031 , 85 L.Ed. 1368 ; Ex parte Yarbrough, 110 U.S. 651 , 4 S.Ct. 152 , 28 L.Ed. 274 . `In other words, the privilege to vote in a state is within the *1002 jurisdiction of the state itself, to be exercised as the state may direct, and upon such terms as to it may seem proper, provided, of course, no discrimination is made between individuals, in violation of the Federal Constitution.' Pope v. Williams, supra, 193 U.S. [621] at 632, 24 S.Ct. at [573] 575, [ 48 L.Ed. 817 ]. ( 380 U.S. at 91 , 85 S.Ct. at 777, 778 , 13 L.Ed.2d at 677, 678 1977Compare United States v. Classic, 313 U.S. 299 , 61 S.Ct. 1031 , 85 L.Ed. 1368 ; Ex parte Yarbrough, 110 U.S. 651 , 4 S.Ct. 152 , 28 L.Ed. 274 . `In other words, the privilege to vote in a state is within the *1002 jurisdiction of the state itself, to be exercised as the state may direct, and upon such terms as to it may seem proper, provided, of course, no discrimination is made between individuals, in violation of the Federal Constitution.' Pope v. Williams, supra, 193 U.S. [621] at 632, 24 S.Ct. at [573] 575, [ 48 L.Ed. 817 ]. ( 380 U.S. at 91 , 85 S.Ct. at 777, 778 , 13 L.Ed.2d at 677, 678 | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Pope v. Williams
yellow
1 sentence1977Compare United States v. Classic, 313 U.S. 299 , 61 S.Ct. 1031 , 85 L.Ed. 1368 ; Ex parte Yarbrough, 110 U.S. 651 , 4 S.Ct. 152 , 28 L.Ed. 274 . `In other words, the privilege to vote in a state is within the *1002 jurisdiction of the state itself, to be exercised as the state may direct, and upon such terms as to it may seem proper, provided, of course, no discrimination is made between individuals, in violation of the Federal Constitution.' Pope v. Williams, supra, 193 U.S. [621] at 632, 24 S.Ct. at [573] 575, [ 48 L.Ed. 817 ]. ( 380 U.S. at 91 , 85 S.Ct. at 777, 778 , 13 L.Ed.2d at 677, 678 | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Lassiter v. Northampton County Board of Elections
green
2 sentences1977In Carrington v. Rash, 380 U.S. 89 , 85 S.Ct. 775 , 13 L.Ed.2d 675 (1965) the Court enunciated this principle in the following language: Indeed, `[t]he States have long been held to have broad powers to determine the conditions under which the right of suffrage may be exercised.' Lassiter v. Northampton County Bd. of Elections, 360 U.S. 45, 50 , 79 S.Ct. 985, 989 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1072 . 1977In Carrington v. Rash, 380 U.S. 89 , 85 S.Ct. 775 , 13 L.Ed.2d 675 (1965) the Court enunciated this principle in the following language: Indeed, `[t]he States have long been held to have broad powers to determine the conditions under which the right of suffrage may be exercised.' Lassiter v. Northampton County Bd. of Elections, 360 U.S. 45, 50 , 79 S.Ct. 985, 989 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1072 . | 1 | 1977–1977 |
McDonald v. Board of Election Comm'rs of Chicago
green
2 sentences1977Compare United States v. Classic, 313 U.S. 299 , 61 S.Ct. 1031 , 85 L.Ed. 1368 ; Ex parte Yarbrough, 110 U.S. 651 , 4 S.Ct. 152 , 28 L.Ed. 274 . `In other words, the privilege to vote in a state is within the *1002 jurisdiction of the state itself, to be exercised as the state may direct, and upon such terms as to it may seem proper, provided, of course, no discrimination is made between individuals, in violation of the Federal Constitution.' Pope v. Williams, supra, 193 U.S. [621] at 632, 24 S.Ct. at [573] 575, [ 48 L.Ed. 817 ]. ( 380 U.S. at 91 , 85 S.Ct. at 777, 778 , 13 L.Ed.2d at 677, 678 1977Compare United States v. Classic, 313 U.S. 299 , 61 S.Ct. 1031 , 85 L.Ed. 1368 ; Ex parte Yarbrough, 110 U.S. 651 , 4 S.Ct. 152 , 28 L.Ed. 274 . `In other words, the privilege to vote in a state is within the *1002 jurisdiction of the state itself, to be exercised as the state may direct, and upon such terms as to it may seem proper, provided, of course, no discrimination is made between individuals, in violation of the Federal Constitution.' Pope v. Williams, supra, 193 U.S. [621] at 632, 24 S.Ct. at [573] 575, [ 48 L.Ed. 817 ]. ( 380 U.S. at 91 , 85 S.Ct. at 777, 778 , 13 L.Ed.2d at 677, 678 | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Bullock v. Carter
green
2 sentences1977Compare United States v. Classic, 313 U.S. 299 , 61 S.Ct. 1031 , 85 L.Ed. 1368 ; Ex parte Yarbrough, 110 U.S. 651 , 4 S.Ct. 152 , 28 L.Ed. 274 . `In other words, the privilege to vote in a state is within the *1002 jurisdiction of the state itself, to be exercised as the state may direct, and upon such terms as to it may seem proper, provided, of course, no discrimination is made between individuals, in violation of the Federal Constitution.' Pope v. Williams, supra, 193 U.S. [621] at 632, 24 S.Ct. at [573] 575, [ 48 L.Ed. 817 ]. ( 380 U.S. at 91 , 85 S.Ct. at 777, 778 , 13 L.Ed.2d at 677, 678 1977Compare United States v. Classic, 313 U.S. 299 , 61 S.Ct. 1031 , 85 L.Ed. 1368 ; Ex parte Yarbrough, 110 U.S. 651 , 4 S.Ct. 152 , 28 L.Ed. 274 . `In other words, the privilege to vote in a state is within the *1002 jurisdiction of the state itself, to be exercised as the state may direct, and upon such terms as to it may seem proper, provided, of course, no discrimination is made between individuals, in violation of the Federal Constitution.' Pope v. Williams, supra, 193 U.S. [621] at 632, 24 S.Ct. at [573] 575, [ 48 L.Ed. 817 ]. ( 380 U.S. at 91 , 85 S.Ct. at 777, 778 , 13 L.Ed.2d at 677, 678 | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.