Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1997–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. Lumpkingreen2 sentences1999Denial of the expert testimony by the defense clearly created a hurdle which Illinois Central could not possibly overcome and could have easily contributed to such a large verdict regarding Gandy's mental health. *539 See Mississippi Power & Light, Co. v. Lumpkin, 725 So.2d 721 (Miss.1998); General Motors Corp. v. Jackson, 636 So.2d 310 (Miss.1992). 1997See Mississippi Power & Light, Co. v. Lumpkin, 725 So. 2d 721 (Miss. 1998); General Motors Corp. v. Jackson, 636 So. 2d 310 (Miss. 1992). | 1 | 2 |
Crosthwait v. Southern Health Corp. of Houstongreen1 sentence2025See Crosthwait v. S. Health Corp. of Houston Inc., 94 So. 3d 1126, 1130 (¶10) (Miss. | 1 | 1 |
Powell v. METHODIST HEALTH CAREgreen1 sentence2011Powell v. Methodist Health Care-Jackson Hosps., 876 So.2d 347, 348 (¶ 4) (Miss.2004). 1Í11. | 1 | 1 |
Coleman v. Ricegreen2 sentences2006However, there is an exception to the expert testimony requirement "`for instances where a layman can observe and understand the negligence as a matter of common sense and practical experience.'" Coleman v. Rice, 706 So.2d 696, 698 (¶ 10) (Miss.1997) (quoting Erby v. North Miss. 2006However, there is an exception to the expert testimony requirement "`for instances where a layman can observe and understand the negligence as a matter of common sense and practical experience.'" Coleman v. Rice , 706 So.2d 696 , 698 (¶ 10) (Miss. 1997) (quoting Erby v. North Miss. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
General Motors Corp. v. Jackson
green
2 sentences1999Denial of the expert testimony by the defense clearly created a hurdle which Illinois Central could not possibly overcome and could have easily contributed to such a large verdict regarding Gandy's mental health. *539 See Mississippi Power & Light, Co. v. Lumpkin, 725 So.2d 721 (Miss.1998); General Motors Corp. v. Jackson, 636 So.2d 310 (Miss.1992). 1997See Mississippi Power & Light, Co. v. Lumpkin, 725 So. 2d 721 (Miss. 1998); General Motors Corp. v. Jackson, 636 So. 2d 310 (Miss. 1992). | 2 | 1997–1999 |
Hall v. Hilbun
green
1 sentence2010Moreover, the trial court had heard sufficient testimony to conclude that CHS personnel did not have a duty to begin their ACLS protocol, because Sykes did not present 10 Palmer, 564 So. 2d at 1354-55 ; Hall, 466 So. 2d at 873 . 10 with typical symptoms of cardiac distress. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Palmer v. Biloxi Regional Medical Center, Inc.
green
1 sentence2010Moreover, the trial court had heard sufficient testimony to conclude that CHS personnel did not have a duty to begin their ACLS protocol, because Sykes did not present 10 Palmer, 564 So. 2d at 1354-55 ; Hall, 466 So. 2d at 873 . 10 with typical symptoms of cardiac distress. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.