Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
County College of Morris Staff Ass'n v. County College of Morrisgreen1 sentence2024We note that cases decided before the TEACHNJ amendments to the TEHL are as pertinent to our analysis as post-amendment cases because the relevant statutory language did not change. 16 In County College of Morris Staff Ass’n v. County College of Morris, we “assumed” that if the arbitrator in that case had concluded that the charged offenses did “not rise to a level of misconduct that constitute[d] just cause for discharge[,] . . . the proper remedy would have been a disciplinary penalty less severe than that of discharge.” 100 N.J. 383, 393-94 (1985) (emphasis added). | 1 | 1 |
LaBRACIO FAM. PARTNERSHIP v. 1239 Roosevelt Ave., Inc.green1 sentence2020Cf. LaBracio Family P'ship v. 1239 Roosevelt Ave., Inc., 340 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
In Re Freygreen2 sentences2003See Frey, 160 N.J.Super. at 143-44 , 388 A.2d 1329 . 2003See Frey, 160 N.J.Super. at 143-44 , 388 A.2d 1329 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Rigoberto Mejia v. New Jersey Department of Corrections
green
2 sentences2020The inmate's history of, or the presence of, mental illness. "[T]he use of those or other 'such factors' [is] entirely [within] the discretion of the hearing officer." Mejia, 446 N.J. 2020As to considering the factors enumerated in N.J.A.C. 10A4:9.17(a), as noted in Mejia, the regulations, "unfortunately, leave the use of those or other 'such factors' entirely to the discretion of the hearing officer." 446 N.J. | 2 | 2020–2020 |
United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs
red
2 sentences1985Gibbs states that "pendent jurisdiction is a doctrine of discretion, not of plaintiff's right," and recommends that "if the federal claims are dismissed before trial, even though not insubstantial in a jurisdictional sense, the state claims should be dismissed as well." 383 U.S. at 726 , 86 S.Ct. at 1139 , 16 L.Ed. 2d at 228 . 1985Gibbs states that "pendent jurisdiction is a doctrine of discretion, not of plaintiff's right," and recommends that "if the federal claims are dismissed before trial, even though not insubstantial in a jurisdictional sense, the state claims should be dismissed as well." 383 U.S. at 726 , 86 S.Ct. at 1139 , 16 L.Ed. 2d at 228 . | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.