Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Vermont opinions name it 2 courts 1925–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Vermont courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Crabbe v. Veve Associatesgreen2 sentences2007See Crabbe v. Veve Assocs., 150 Vt. 53, 58 , 549 A.2d 1045, 1049 (1988) (holding that where the evidence of value is conflicting, a determination is properly left up to the fact finder). 2007See Crabbe v. Veve Assocs., 150 Vt. 53, 58 , 549 A.2d 1045, 1049 (1988) (holding that where the evidence of value is conflicting, a determination is properly left up to the fact finder). | 3 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Vermont. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Gaubert
green
2 sentences2017Id. 2005Id. | 2 | 2005–2017 |
James Ingerson v. Andrew Pallito, Commissioner, Vermont Department of Corrections and Leanne Salls
green
1 sentence2021“If a statute or regulation or policy specifically prescribes a course of action for an employee to follow, then the discretion requirement is not met.” Ingerson v. Pallito, 2019 VT 40, ¶ 13 , 210 Vt. 341 , 214 A.3d 824 (quotation omitted). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Lane v. State
green
2 sentences2019“If a statute or regulation or policy specifically prescribes a course of action for an employee to follow, then the discretion requirement is not met.” Lane, 174 Vt. at 224 , 811 A.2d at 194 . 2019“If a statute or regulation or policy specifically prescribes a course of action for an employee to follow, then the discretion requirement is not met.” Lane, 174 Vt. at 224 , 811 A.2d at 194 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Berkovitz v. United States
green
1 sentence2002Id. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Hassam v. J. E. Safford Lumber Co.
green
2 sentences1925Hassam v. Safford Lumber Co., 82 Vt. 444 , 74 Atl. 197 ; Goulette’s Admr. v. Grand Trunk Ry. 1925Hassam v. Safford Lumber Co., 82 Vt. 444 , 74 Atl. 197 ; Goulette’s Admr. v. Grand Trunk Ry. | 1 | 1925–1925 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.