Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1995–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Osoriogreen2 sentences2025Our Supreme Court outlined a similar three-step analysis for trial courts to follow when adjudicating a claim of unconstitutional discrimination in the use of peremptory challenges in Gilmore, 103 N.J. at 533-39 , and "slightly" refined the methodology in State v. Osorio, 199 N.J. 486, 492 (2009). 3 "That analysis begins with the 'rebuttable presumption that the prosecution has exercised its peremptory challenges on' constitutionally 3 Prompted by Andujar, 247 N.J. at 275, in its July 2022 order, our Court adopted Rule 1:8-3A and revised Rule 1:8-3(b) to read, "if the court finds there is a re 2025Our Supreme Court outlined a similar three-step analysis for trial courts to follow when adjudicating a claim of unconstitutional discrimination in the use of peremptory challenges in Gilmore, 103 N.J. at 533-39 , and "slightly" refined the methodology in State v. Osorio, 199 N.J. 486, 492 (2009). 3 "That analysis begins with the 'rebuttable presumption that the prosecution has exercised its peremptory challenges on' constitutionally 3 Prompted by Andujar, 247 N.J. at 275, in its July 2022 order, our Court adopted Rule 1:8-3A and revised Rule 1:8-3(b) to read, "if the court finds there is a re | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Gilmore
green
2 sentences2025Our Supreme Court outlined a similar three-step analysis for trial courts to follow when adjudicating a claim of unconstitutional discrimination in the use of peremptory challenges in Gilmore, 103 N.J. at 533-39 , and "slightly" refined the methodology in State v. Osorio, 199 N.J. 486, 492 (2009). 3 "That analysis begins with the 'rebuttable presumption that the prosecution has exercised its peremptory challenges on' constitutionally 3 Prompted by Andujar, 247 N.J. at 275, in its July 2022 order, our Court adopted Rule 1:8-3A and revised Rule 1:8-3(b) to read, "if the court finds there is a re 2025Our Supreme Court outlined a similar three-step analysis for trial courts to follow when adjudicating a claim of unconstitutional discrimination in the use of peremptory challenges in Gilmore, 103 N.J. at 533-39 , and "slightly" refined the methodology in State v. Osorio, 199 N.J. 486, 492 (2009). 3 "That analysis begins with the 'rebuttable presumption that the prosecution has exercised its peremptory challenges on' constitutionally 3 Prompted by Andujar, 247 N.J. at 275, in its July 2022 order, our Court adopted Rule 1:8-3A and revised Rule 1:8-3(b) to read, "if the court finds there is a re | 3 | 1995–2025 |
State v. Bey
green
2 sentences2000In State v. Bey, 112 N.J. 123, 154 , 548 A.2d 887 (1988) (Bey II), we explained that an improper denial of a for-cause challenge does not always require a new trial. 2000In State v. Bey, 112 N.J. 123, 154 , 548 A.2d 887 (1988) (Bey II), we explained that an improper denial of a for-cause challenge does not always require a new trial. | 2 | 1995–2000 |
State v. Harris
green
2 sentences1999Harris, supra, 141 N.J. at 543 , 662 A.2d 333 . 1999Harris, supra, 141 N.J. at 543 , 662 A.2d 333 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Batson v. Kentucky
green
2 sentences1995Although the explanation need not rise to the level of a for-cause challenge, the party must be able to articulate a reason which is unrelated to race and which is related to the case being tried. 476 U.S. at 97-98 , 106 S.Ct. at 1723-24 , 90 L.Ed. 2d at 88 . 1995Although the explanation need not rise to the level of a for-cause challenge, the party must be able to articulate a reason which is unrelated to race and which is related to the case being tried. 476 U.S. at 97-98 , 106 S.Ct. at 1723-24 , 90 L.Ed. 2d at 88 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.