external factors (Ohio) · Go Syfert
← Ohio issues

external factors in Ohio

6 Ohio opinions name it 1 courts 1944–2007 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Barnettgreen
ohioctapp · 1990 · cited in 4 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 2001–2007
2 sentences

2007See State v. Barnett (1990), 67 Ohio App.3d 760 , 768 (holding that "[o]ne of the strongest of these external factors which may be used to prove the accuracy of the identification is the situation where the witness already knew the perpetrator before the crime was committed").

2006State v. Barnett (1990), 67 Ohio App.3d 760 ("One of the strongest of these external factors which may be used to prove the accuracy of the identification is the situation where the witness already knew the perpetrator before the crime was committed"); State v. Green, Montgomery App. No. 19224, 2003-Ohio-5744 , ¶ 7 , citing State v. Huff (2001), 145 Ohio App.3d 555 , 564 , ("A strong showing of reliability can arise from the fact that a victim knew the perpetrator of a crime before the crime was committed"); State v. Young (April 12, 2001), Cuyahoga App. No. 78058. {¶ 19} Under these circumsta

24
State v. Huffgreen
ohioctapp · 2001 · cited in 2 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 2002–2006
2 sentences

2006State v. Barnett (1990), 67 Ohio App.3d 760 ("One of the strongest of these external factors which may be used to prove the accuracy of the identification is the situation where the witness already knew the perpetrator before the crime was committed"); State v. Green, Montgomery App. No. 19224, 2003-Ohio-5744 , ¶ 7 , citing State v. Huff (2001), 145 Ohio App.3d 555 , 564 , ("A strong showing of reliability can arise from the fact that a victim knew the perpetrator of a crime before the crime was committed"); State v. Young (April 12, 2001), Cuyahoga App. No. 78058. {¶ 19} Under these circumsta

2002See, e.g., State v. Huff (2001), 145 Ohio App.3d 555 , 564 ("A strong showing of reliability can arise from the fact that a victim knew the perpetrator of a crime before the crime was committed."); Barnett (1990), 67 Ohio App.3d at 768 ("One of the strongest of these external factors which may be used to prove the accuracy of the identification is the situation where the witness already knew the perpetrator before the crime was committed.").

12
State v. Jonesgreen
moctapp · 1982 · cited in 1 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 1990–1990
1 sentence

1990Ward, supra, 63 Ill.App.3d at 869 , 20 Ill.Dec. at 678 , 380 N.E.2d at 887 ; United States v. Anderson (D.C.1974), 490 F.2d 785, 787 ; see, also, State v. Jones (Mo.App.1982), 643 S.W.2d 34 ; State v. Denny (N.D.1984), 351 N.W.2d 102 ; State v. Welch (1983), 65 N.C.App. 390 , 308 S.E.2d 910 ; Commonwealth v. Buehl (1986), 510 Pa. 363 , 508 A.2d 1167 ; State v. Findlay (1986), 198 Conn. 328 , 502 A.2d 921 ; Wicks v. Lockhart (E.D.Ark.1983), 569 F.Supp. 549 . *769 In evaluating the totality of the circumstances, there was sufficient evidence adduced at both the suppression hearing and the trial,

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (9)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Green, Unpublished Decision (10-24-2003) green
ohioctapp · 2003
1 sentence

2006State v. Barnett (1990), 67 Ohio App.3d 760 ("One of the strongest of these external factors which may be used to prove the accuracy of the identification is the situation where the witness already knew the perpetrator before the crime was committed"); State v. Green, Montgomery App. No. 19224, 2003-Ohio-5744 , ¶ 7 , citing State v. Huff (2001), 145 Ohio App.3d 555 , 564 , ("A strong showing of reliability can arise from the fact that a victim knew the perpetrator of a crime before the crime was committed"); State v. Young (April 12, 2001), Cuyahoga App. No. 78058. {¶ 19} Under these circumsta

12006–2006
People v. Ward green
illappct · 1978
2 sentences

1990Ward, supra, 63 Ill.App.3d at 869 , 20 Ill.Dec. at 678 , 380 N.E.2d at 887 ; United States v. Anderson (D.C.1974), 490 F.2d 785, 787 ; see, also, State v. Jones (Mo.App.1982), 643 S.W.2d 34 ; State v. Denny (N.D.1984), 351 N.W.2d 102 ; State v. Welch (1983), 65 N.C.App. 390 , 308 S.E.2d 910 ; Commonwealth v. Buehl (1986), 510 Pa. 363 , 508 A.2d 1167 ; State v. Findlay (1986), 198 Conn. 328 , 502 A.2d 921 ; Wicks v. Lockhart (E.D.Ark.1983), 569 F.Supp. 549 . *769 In evaluating the totality of the circumstances, there was sufficient evidence adduced at both the suppression hearing and the trial,

1990Ward, supra, 63 Ill.App.3d at 869 , 20 Ill.Dec. at 678 , 380 N.E.2d at 887 ; United States v. Anderson (D.C.1974), 490 F.2d 785, 787 ; see, also, State v. Jones (Mo.App.1982), 643 S.W.2d 34 ; State v. Denny (N.D.1984), 351 N.W.2d 102 ; State v. Welch (1983), 65 N.C.App. 390 , 308 S.E.2d 910 ; Commonwealth v. Buehl (1986), 510 Pa. 363 , 508 A.2d 1167 ; State v. Findlay (1986), 198 Conn. 328 , 502 A.2d 921 ; Wicks v. Lockhart (E.D.Ark.1983), 569 F.Supp. 549 . *769 In evaluating the totality of the circumstances, there was sufficient evidence adduced at both the suppression hearing and the trial,

11990–1990
State v. Findlay green
conn · 1986
2 sentences

1990Ward, supra, 63 Ill.App.3d at 869 , 20 Ill.Dec. at 678 , 380 N.E.2d at 887 ; United States v. Anderson (D.C.1974), 490 F.2d 785, 787 ; see, also, State v. Jones (Mo.App.1982), 643 S.W.2d 34 ; State v. Denny (N.D.1984), 351 N.W.2d 102 ; State v. Welch (1983), 65 N.C.App. 390 , 308 S.E.2d 910 ; Commonwealth v. Buehl (1986), 510 Pa. 363 , 508 A.2d 1167 ; State v. Findlay (1986), 198 Conn. 328 , 502 A.2d 921 ; Wicks v. Lockhart (E.D.Ark.1983), 569 F.Supp. 549 . *769 In evaluating the totality of the circumstances, there was sufficient evidence adduced at both the suppression hearing and the trial,

1990Ward, supra, 63 Ill.App.3d at 869 , 20 Ill.Dec. at 678 , 380 N.E.2d at 887 ; United States v. Anderson (D.C.1974), 490 F.2d 785, 787 ; see, also, State v. Jones (Mo.App.1982), 643 S.W.2d 34 ; State v. Denny (N.D.1984), 351 N.W.2d 102 ; State v. Welch (1983), 65 N.C.App. 390 , 308 S.E.2d 910 ; Commonwealth v. Buehl (1986), 510 Pa. 363 , 508 A.2d 1167 ; State v. Findlay (1986), 198 Conn. 328 , 502 A.2d 921 ; Wicks v. Lockhart (E.D.Ark.1983), 569 F.Supp. 549 . *769 In evaluating the totality of the circumstances, there was sufficient evidence adduced at both the suppression hearing and the trial,

11990–1990
Wicks v. Lockhart green
ared · 1983
1 sentence

1990Ward, supra, 63 Ill.App.3d at 869 , 20 Ill.Dec. at 678 , 380 N.E.2d at 887 ; United States v. Anderson (D.C.1974), 490 F.2d 785, 787 ; see, also, State v. Jones (Mo.App.1982), 643 S.W.2d 34 ; State v. Denny (N.D.1984), 351 N.W.2d 102 ; State v. Welch (1983), 65 N.C.App. 390 , 308 S.E.2d 910 ; Commonwealth v. Buehl (1986), 510 Pa. 363 , 508 A.2d 1167 ; State v. Findlay (1986), 198 Conn. 328 , 502 A.2d 921 ; Wicks v. Lockhart (E.D.Ark.1983), 569 F.Supp. 549 . *769 In evaluating the totality of the circumstances, there was sufficient evidence adduced at both the suppression hearing and the trial,

11990–1990
State v. Denny green
nd · 1984
1 sentence

1990Ward, supra, 63 Ill.App.3d at 869 , 20 Ill.Dec. at 678 , 380 N.E.2d at 887 ; United States v. Anderson (D.C.1974), 490 F.2d 785, 787 ; see, also, State v. Jones (Mo.App.1982), 643 S.W.2d 34 ; State v. Denny (N.D.1984), 351 N.W.2d 102 ; State v. Welch (1983), 65 N.C.App. 390 , 308 S.E.2d 910 ; Commonwealth v. Buehl (1986), 510 Pa. 363 , 508 A.2d 1167 ; State v. Findlay (1986), 198 Conn. 328 , 502 A.2d 921 ; Wicks v. Lockhart (E.D.Ark.1983), 569 F.Supp. 549 . *769 In evaluating the totality of the circumstances, there was sufficient evidence adduced at both the suppression hearing and the trial,

11990–1990
United States v. James F. Anderson green
cadc · 1974
1 sentence

1990Ward, supra, 63 Ill.App.3d at 869 , 20 Ill.Dec. at 678 , 380 N.E.2d at 887 ; United States v. Anderson (D.C.1974), 490 F.2d 785, 787 ; see, also, State v. Jones (Mo.App.1982), 643 S.W.2d 34 ; State v. Denny (N.D.1984), 351 N.W.2d 102 ; State v. Welch (1983), 65 N.C.App. 390 , 308 S.E.2d 910 ; Commonwealth v. Buehl (1986), 510 Pa. 363 , 508 A.2d 1167 ; State v. Findlay (1986), 198 Conn. 328 , 502 A.2d 921 ; Wicks v. Lockhart (E.D.Ark.1983), 569 F.Supp. 549 . *769 In evaluating the totality of the circumstances, there was sufficient evidence adduced at both the suppression hearing and the trial,

11990–1990
Commonwealth v. Buehl green
pa · 1986
2 sentences

1990Ward, supra, 63 Ill.App.3d at 869 , 20 Ill.Dec. at 678 , 380 N.E.2d at 887 ; United States v. Anderson (D.C.1974), 490 F.2d 785, 787 ; see, also, State v. Jones (Mo.App.1982), 643 S.W.2d 34 ; State v. Denny (N.D.1984), 351 N.W.2d 102 ; State v. Welch (1983), 65 N.C.App. 390 , 308 S.E.2d 910 ; Commonwealth v. Buehl (1986), 510 Pa. 363 , 508 A.2d 1167 ; State v. Findlay (1986), 198 Conn. 328 , 502 A.2d 921 ; Wicks v. Lockhart (E.D.Ark.1983), 569 F.Supp. 549 . *769 In evaluating the totality of the circumstances, there was sufficient evidence adduced at both the suppression hearing and the trial,

1990Ward, supra, 63 Ill.App.3d at 869 , 20 Ill.Dec. at 678 , 380 N.E.2d at 887 ; United States v. Anderson (D.C.1974), 490 F.2d 785, 787 ; see, also, State v. Jones (Mo.App.1982), 643 S.W.2d 34 ; State v. Denny (N.D.1984), 351 N.W.2d 102 ; State v. Welch (1983), 65 N.C.App. 390 , 308 S.E.2d 910 ; Commonwealth v. Buehl (1986), 510 Pa. 363 , 508 A.2d 1167 ; State v. Findlay (1986), 198 Conn. 328 , 502 A.2d 921 ; Wicks v. Lockhart (E.D.Ark.1983), 569 F.Supp. 549 . *769 In evaluating the totality of the circumstances, there was sufficient evidence adduced at both the suppression hearing and the trial,

11990–1990
State v. Welch green
ncctapp · 1983
2 sentences

1990Ward, supra, 63 Ill.App.3d at 869 , 20 Ill.Dec. at 678 , 380 N.E.2d at 887 ; United States v. Anderson (D.C.1974), 490 F.2d 785, 787 ; see, also, State v. Jones (Mo.App.1982), 643 S.W.2d 34 ; State v. Denny (N.D.1984), 351 N.W.2d 102 ; State v. Welch (1983), 65 N.C.App. 390 , 308 S.E.2d 910 ; Commonwealth v. Buehl (1986), 510 Pa. 363 , 508 A.2d 1167 ; State v. Findlay (1986), 198 Conn. 328 , 502 A.2d 921 ; Wicks v. Lockhart (E.D.Ark.1983), 569 F.Supp. 549 . *769 In evaluating the totality of the circumstances, there was sufficient evidence adduced at both the suppression hearing and the trial,

1990Ward, supra, 63 Ill.App.3d at 869 , 20 Ill.Dec. at 678 , 380 N.E.2d at 887 ; United States v. Anderson (D.C.1974), 490 F.2d 785, 787 ; see, also, State v. Jones (Mo.App.1982), 643 S.W.2d 34 ; State v. Denny (N.D.1984), 351 N.W.2d 102 ; State v. Welch (1983), 65 N.C.App. 390 , 308 S.E.2d 910 ; Commonwealth v. Buehl (1986), 510 Pa. 363 , 508 A.2d 1167 ; State v. Findlay (1986), 198 Conn. 328 , 502 A.2d 921 ; Wicks v. Lockhart (E.D.Ark.1983), 569 F.Supp. 549 . *769 In evaluating the totality of the circumstances, there was sufficient evidence adduced at both the suppression hearing and the trial,

11990–1990
Koch v. Streuter green
· 1905
2 sentences

1944Koch v. Streuter, 218 Ill., 546 , 75 N. E., 1049 ; 25 R.

1944Koch v. Streuter, 218 Ill., 546 , 75 N. E., 1049 ; 25 R.

11944–1944

Where else courts name it

CA 10 (1941–2024) CT 7 (1935–2017) OH 6 (1944–2007) AL 5 (1977–2026) TX 4 (1967–2003) WA 4 (1996–2024) MI 4 (1991–2022) MO 4 (1906–2008) NC 3 (1988–2013) IA 3 (1949–2016) SD 3 (1960–1970) MS 2 (1964–1967) HI 2 (1964–1994) AK 2 (1969–1989) OK 2 (1976–2008) MN 2 (2001–2016) NJ 2 (1953–2008) MA 2 (1995–2026)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check