Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 1989–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Leongreen2 sentences2020Id. {¶ 73} The state’s argument does not align with Leon’s analysis of the third exception. 2019See Leon, supra, 468 U.S., at 916–922, 104 S.Ct. at 3417–3420; Sheppard, supra, 468 U.S., at 990–991, 104 S.Ct. at 3428–3429. | 1 | 3 |
United States v. Tyrone Christiangreen1 sentence2022The majority conflates an affidavit that is bare bones with an affidavit that lacks probable cause {¶ 49} “Too often courts raise the Leon bar, making it practically indistinguishable from the probable cause standard itself.” Christian, 925 F.3d at 318 (Thapar, J., concurring). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Wilmoth
green
2 sentences2020We adopted the Leon analysis in State v. Wilmoth, 22 Ohio St.3d 251 , 490 N.E.2d 1236 (1986). 2020We adopted the Leon analysis in State v. Wilmoth, 22 Ohio St.3d 251 , 490 N.E.2d 1236 (1986). | 2 | 1989–2020 |
United States v. Tyrone Gilbert
green
1 sentence2022This is what the majority has done in concluding that 24 January Term, 2022 the affidavit at issue is bare bones; it has “confuse[d] a bare bones affidavit with one that merely lacks probable cause,” Gilbert, 952 F.3d at 763 . {¶ 50} The majority ignores the verifiable facts in the affidavit, which establish “some connection” between the fatal automobile accident and the cell phones found at the accident scene. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
United States v. Gary Lynn Weaver
green
1 sentence2008Therefore, we do not apply these cases to our Leon analysis. {¶ 38} The defense also relies on United States v. Weaver (C.A.6, 1996), 99 F.3d 1372 , to argue that the affidavit lacked indicia of probable cause. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.