Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1989–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Leongreen2 sentences2000See Leon, supra, at 916-922 , 104 S.Ct. 3405 ; Sheppard, supra, at 990-991 , 104 S.Ct. 3424 . 2000See Leon, supra, at 916-922 , 104 S.Ct. 3405 ; Sheppard, supra, at 990-991 , 104 S.Ct. 3424 . | 2 | 2 |
Davis v. United Statesgreen2 sentences2018See Davis, 564 U.S. at 229; Illinois v. Krull, 480 U.S. 340 (1987). 2018See Davis, 564 U.S. at 229; Illinois v. Krull, 480 U.S. 340 (1987). | 1 | 1 |
McPherson v. Flynngreen1 sentence2018In 1999, the Florida Legislature amended section 102.168 to allow for post-election challenges based on the successful candidate’s ineligibility for the nomination or office in dispute.” (quoting McPherson v. Flynn, 397 So. 2d 665, 668 (Fla. 1981))). | 1 | 1 |
Burns v. Tondreaugreen1 sentence2018We do not address the merits of Leon’s residency challenge because we agree with the trial court that the lawsuit was due to be dismissed as an unauthorized post-election challenge to Carollo’s qualifications to run for office.1 DISCUSSION While at common law there was no right to a post-election challenge, the legislature added section 102.168(3)(b) to allow a post-election challenge based on the “[i]neligibility of the successful candidate for nomination or office in dispute.”2 1 Because we are not reaching the merits of Leon’s claim, we do not address the arguments in the parties’ briefs ab | 1 | 1 |
Leon v. Unemployment Appeals Com'ngreen1 sentence2009See § 443.151(3), Fla. Stat. (2009) (providing that an appeal from an unemployment compensation claim decision must be filed within twenty (20) days after mailing of the notice of decision); Leon v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 476 So.2d 761, 761 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (observing that “late filing deprived the *689 referee of jurisdiction to consider the merits of Leon’s claim”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Illinois v. Krull
green
2 sentences2018See Davis, 564 U.S. at 229; Illinois v. Krull, 480 U.S. 340 (1987). 2018See Davis, 564 U.S. at 229; Illinois v. Krull, 480 U.S. 340 (1987). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Massachusetts v. Sheppard
green
2 sentences2000See Leon, supra, at 916-922 , 104 S.Ct. 3405 ; Sheppard, supra, at 990-991 , 104 S.Ct. 3424 . 2000See Leon, supra, at 916-922 , 104 S.Ct. 3405 ; Sheppard, supra, at 990-991 , 104 S.Ct. 3424 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
State v. Garcia
neutral
2 sentences1990State v. Moise, 522 So.2d 1023 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); State v. Garcia, 503 So.2d 347 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 511 So.2d 298 (Fla. 1987); State v. Wildes, 468 So.2d 550 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). 1990State v. Moise, 522 So.2d 1023 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); State v. Garcia, 503 So.2d 347 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 511 So.2d 298 (Fla. 1987); State v. Wildes, 468 So.2d 550 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
State v. Moise
green
2 sentences1990State v. Moise, 522 So.2d 1023 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); State v. Garcia, 503 So.2d 347 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 511 So.2d 298 (Fla. 1987); State v. Wildes, 468 So.2d 550 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). 1990State v. Moise, 522 So.2d 1023 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); State v. Garcia, 503 So.2d 347 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 511 So.2d 298 (Fla. 1987); State v. Wildes, 468 So.2d 550 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
State v. Wildes
green
2 sentences1990State v. Moise, 522 So.2d 1023 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); State v. Garcia, 503 So.2d 347 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 511 So.2d 298 (Fla. 1987); State v. Wildes, 468 So.2d 550 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). 1990State v. Moise, 522 So.2d 1023 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); State v. Garcia, 503 So.2d 347 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 511 So.2d 298 (Fla. 1987); State v. Wildes, 468 So.2d 550 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.