6 Oregon opinions name it 2 courts 1908–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. JR Clark Co.green2 sentences1973Clark Co., 239 Minn. 511, 518 , 59 N.W. 2d 899, 904 (1953). 1973Clark Co., 239 Minn. 511, 518 , 59 N.W. 2d 899, 904 (1953). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
AAA Oregon/Idaho Auto Source, LLC v. State
green
2 sentences2020The Use Tax thus complements the Privilege Tax, ensuring that the “privilege tax can be imposed on in-state vehicle dealers without placing them at a competitive disadvantage to out-of-state vehicle dealers * * *.” AAA Oregon/Idaho Auto Source v. Dept. of Rev., 363 Or 411, 425 , 423 P3d 71 (2018). 2020The Use Tax thus complements the Privilege Tax, ensuring that the “privilege tax can be imposed on in-state vehicle dealers without placing them at a competitive disadvantage to out-of-state vehicle dealers * * *.” AAA Oregon/Idaho Auto Source v. Dept. of Rev., 363 Or 411, 425 , 423 P3d 71 (2018). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Murray v. Wiley
green
2 sentences1988It has been determined that: “ ‘Whatever is sufficient to put a subsequent purchaser on inquiry must be considered legal notice to him of those rights, and when the purchaser omits to observe that ordinary precaution, he must be charged with a knowledge of all facts he might have learned by the exercise of reasonable diligence * * *.'” Murray v. Wiley, 169 Or 381, 405 , 127 P2d 112 , 129 P2d 66 (1942). 1988It has been determined that: “ ‘Whatever is sufficient to put a subsequent purchaser on inquiry must be considered legal notice to him of those rights, and when the purchaser omits to observe that ordinary precaution, he must be charged with a knowledge of all facts he might have learned by the exercise of reasonable diligence * * *.'” Murray v. Wiley, 169 Or 381, 405 , 127 P2d 112 , 129 P2d 66 (1942). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Francis v. Bohart
green
1 sentence1922It is conceded that the commencement of any litigation that can proceed only on the theory that title has passed to the purchaser on waiver by the seller constitutes an election which the seller cannot revoke: Francis v. Bohart, 75.Or. 1, 6 ( 143 Pac. 920 , 147 Pac. 755 , L. | 1 | 1922–1922 |
Hickman v. Richburg
neutral
1 sentence1914In Hickman v. Richburg, 122 Ala. 638 ( 26 South. 136 ), the plaintiff had contracted to sell lumber to the defendant, reserving title until the price was paid. | 1 | 1914–1914 |
Bent v. Coleman
neutral
1 sentence1908Whatever is sufficient to put a subsequent purchaser on inquiry must be considered legal notice to him of those rights, and when the purchaser omits to observe that ordinary precaution, he must be charged with a knowledge of all facts he might have'learned by the exercise of reasonable diligence in making-inquiry as to matters to which his attention had been directed: Dembitz, Land Titles, §§ 132, 133; Bent v. Coleman, 89 Ill. 364 ; Citizens' Nat. | 1 | 1908–1908 |
Citizens' National Bank v. Dayton
neutral
2 sentences1908Bank v. Dayton, 116 Ill. 257 ( 4 N. E. 492 ); Pringle v. Phillips, 5 Sandf. 1908Bank v. Dayton, 116 Ill. 257 ( 4 N. E. 492 ); Pringle v. Phillips, 5 Sandf. | 1 | 1908–1908 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.