5 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 1920–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Michael Mattox and Pinnacle Partners, LLC v. Main Entrance, Inc.; Jeffrey Clay Smith; McGill Companies, LLC; And Alice Mattox
neutral
1 sentence2024Here, as the circuit court found, when the parties negotiated their agreement, they expressly agreed that a “waiver by the Seller of any breach of any of the provisions of this agreement required to be performed by the Purchaser shall not bar the rights of the Seller to 12 avail itself of any subsequent breach of any such provision.” The parties further agreed that their “agreement constitutes all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties hereto with regard to the transaction contemplated hereby and shall not be amended or modified except by a written instrument signed by the parties | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Pressed Steel Car Co. v. Lyons
green
2 sentences1980Appellant also relies upon Pressed Steel Car Co. v. Lyons, 7 Ill. 2d 95 , 129 N.E. 2d 765 (1955), in which the Illinois Supreme Court held that a tax, imposed upon the sale of goods, applied to goods sold to a railroad and shipped via the purchaser under standard bills of lading f.o.b. point of origin. 1980Appellant also relies upon Pressed Steel Car Co. v. Lyons, 7 Ill. 2d 95 , 129 N.E. 2d 765 (1955), in which the Illinois Supreme Court held that a tax, imposed upon the sale of goods, applied to goods sold to a railroad and shipped via the purchaser under standard bills of lading f.o.b. point of origin. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Glantz v. Gardiner
neutral
1 sentence1941I. 297, 100 Atl. 913 , L. | 1 | 1941–1941 |
Market Nat. Bank of Cincinnati, Ohio v. Raspberry
green
1 sentence1930Market National Bank of Cincinnati v. Raspberry, 34 Okla. 243 . | 1 | 1930–1930 |
Morris-Morton Drug Co. v. Glenwood Drug Co.
neutral
1 sentence1920Stuart v. Elk Horn Bank & Trust Co., 123 Ark. 285 ; Morris-Morton Drug Co. v. Glenwood Drug Co., 127 Ark. 296 ; Heldman Clothing Co. v. Oates, 135 Ark. 252 . | 1 | 1920–1920 |
Heldman Clothing Co. v. Oates
neutral
1 sentence1920Stuart v. Elk Horn Bank & Trust Co., 123 Ark. 285 ; Morris-Morton Drug Co. v. Glenwood Drug Co., 127 Ark. 296 ; Heldman Clothing Co. v. Oates, 135 Ark. 252 . | 1 | 1920–1920 |
Stuart v. Elk Horn Bank & Trust Co.
green
1 sentence1920Stuart v. Elk Horn Bank & Trust Co., 123 Ark. 285 ; Morris-Morton Drug Co. v. Glenwood Drug Co., 127 Ark. 296 ; Heldman Clothing Co. v. Oates, 135 Ark. 252 . | 1 | 1920–1920 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.