Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1890–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Morehead v. Harrisgreen2 sentences2011If the facts disclosed in a deed in the chain of title are sufficient to put the purchaser on inquiry, he will be charged with notice of what a proper inquiry would have disclosed.” Id. at 340 , 137 S.E.2d at 183 (citation omitted). 2011If the facts disclosed in a deed in the chain of title are sufficient to put the purchaser on inquiry, he will be charged with notice of what a proper inquiry would have disclosed.” Id. at 340 , 137 S.E.2d at 183 (citation omitted). | 1 | 2 |
Perkins v. Langdongreen2 sentences2023See Perkins v. Langdon, 237 N.C. 159, 165-66 , 74 S.E.2d 634, 640 (1953) (purchaser takes subject to short-term lease when it had knowledge of the lease or if circumstances put the purchaser on inquiry notice regarding the lease’s existence). 2023See Perkins v. Langdon, 237 N.C. 159, 165-66 , 74 S.E.2d 634, 640 (1953) (purchaser takes subject to short-term lease when it had knowledge of the lease or if circumstances put the purchaser on inquiry notice regarding the lease’s existence). | 1 | 1 |
Hughes v. North Carolina State Highway Commissiongreen2 sentences1994Hughes v. Highway Comm., 275 N.C. 121, 130 , 165 S.E.2d 321, 327 (1969) (emphasis added) (citation omitted). 1994Hughes v. Highway Comm., 275 N.C. 121, 130 , 165 S.E.2d 321, 327 (1969) (emphasis added) (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Triplett v. James
green
2 sentences1991In Triplett v. James, 45 N.C.App. 96 , 262 S.E.2d 374 , cert. denied, 300 N.C. 202 , 269 S.E.2d 621 (1980), the Court of Appeals ruled that N.C.G.S. § 20-294, which sets out the grounds for revocation or suspension of a dealer's license, does not enlarge the coverage of N.C.G.S. *856 § 20-288(e) to parties other than a purchaser. 45 N.C.App. at 99 , 262 S.E.2d at 376 . 1991In Triplett v. James, 45 N.C.App. 96 , 262 S.E.2d 374 , cert. denied, 300 N.C. 202 , 269 S.E.2d 621 (1980), the Court of Appeals ruled that N.C.G.S. § 20-294, which sets out the grounds for revocation or suspension of a dealer's license, does not enlarge the coverage of N.C.G.S. *856 § 20-288(e) to parties other than a purchaser. 45 N.C.App. at 99 , 262 S.E.2d at 376 . | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Town of Bladenboro v. McKeithan
green
1 sentence1991In Triplett v. James, 45 N.C.App. 96 , 262 S.E.2d 374 , cert. denied, 300 N.C. 202 , 269 S.E.2d 621 (1980), the Court of Appeals ruled that N.C.G.S. § 20-294, which sets out the grounds for revocation or suspension of a dealer's license, does not enlarge the coverage of N.C.G.S. *856 § 20-288(e) to parties other than a purchaser. 45 N.C.App. at 99 , 262 S.E.2d at 376 . | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Bost v. Riley
green
1 sentence1991In Triplett v. James, 45 N.C.App. 96 , 262 S.E.2d 374 , cert. denied, 300 N.C. 202 , 269 S.E.2d 621 (1980), the Court of Appeals ruled that N.C.G.S. § 20-294, which sets out the grounds for revocation or suspension of a dealer's license, does not enlarge the coverage of N.C.G.S. *856 § 20-288(e) to parties other than a purchaser. 45 N.C.App. at 99 , 262 S.E.2d at 376 . | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Mason v. Andersen
green
2 sentences1989App. 568 , 235 S.E.2d 880 (1977), where this Court held, the following language was insufficient to convey an easement to a purchaser for the privilege of using a lake located in a subdevelopment: “This deed is delivered and accepted subject to those restrictions [which were recorded in a plat book].” Id. at 571 , 235 S.E.2d at 882 . 1989App. 568 , 235 S.E.2d 880 (1977), where this Court held, the following language was insufficient to convey an easement to a purchaser for the privilege of using a lake located in a subdevelopment: “This deed is delivered and accepted subject to those restrictions [which were recorded in a plat book].” Id. at 571 , 235 S.E.2d at 882 . | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Randle Ex Rel. Love v. Grady
green
2 sentences1964Jur., Vendor and Vendee, § 708, pp. 1083-4; Randle v. Grady, 224 N.C. 651 , 32 S.E. 2d 20 . 1964Jur., Vendor and Vendee, § 708, pp. 1083-4; Randle v. Grady, 224 N.C. 651 , 32 S.E. 2d 20 . | 1 | 1964–1964 |
Norton v. Birge
neutral
1 sentence1890Such is the ruling in Norton v. Birge, 35 Conn., 250 , wffiich is approved by Mr. Bennett in his work on “ Lis Pendens.” *366 It is conceded that there is some conflict of authority upon the subject, but it is believed that the contrary decisions are influenced in some of the States by the doctrine that actual notice of an unregistered incumbrance constitutes an equity, and that for this reason the rule does not apply. | 1 | 1890–1890 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.