delinquency hearing (Pennsylvania) · Go Syfert
← Pennsylvania issues

delinquency hearing in Pennsylvania

6 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 1972–2018 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
In the Interest of K.A.T.green
pasuperct · 2013 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018
1 sentence

2018See In re K.A.T., Jr., 69 A.3d 691, 697-98 (Pa. Super. 2013). -2- J-S07005-18 files such a motion, the trial court may conduct a hearing regarding any ineffectiveness claim(s) raised therein, develop a record regarding the issue(s), and decide, in the first instance, if a new delinquency hearing is warranted.2 Order vacated.

11
Lawrence D. Coleman v. The Honorable Arthur L. Burnett, United States Magistrate for the District of Columbiagreen
cadc · 1973 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1976–1976
2 sentences

1976Cf. Coleman v. Burnett, 155 U.S.App.D.C. 302 , 477 F.2d 1187, 1210-1212 (1973); United States v. Pollard, 335 F.Supp. 868 (D.D.C. 1971) (subsequent indictment does not bar affording preliminary hearing to defendant where official misconduct aborts preliminary hearing or renders it meaningless.) NOTES [1] Act of June 13, 1967, P.L. 31, No. 21, art. 7, § 731, 62 P.S. § 731. [2] The pertinent part of the Compact is Article V, providing for interstate rendition of juveniles who have escaped from confinement or have absconded from probation or parole supervision.

1976Cf. Coleman v. Burnett, 155 U.S.App.D.C. 302 , 477 F.2d 1187, 1210-1212 (1973); United States v. Pollard, 335 F.Supp. 868 (D.D.C. 1971) (subsequent indictment does not bar affording preliminary hearing to defendant where official misconduct aborts preliminary hearing or renders it meaningless.) NOTES [1] Act of June 13, 1967, P.L. 31, No. 21, art. 7, § 731, 62 P.S. § 731. [2] The pertinent part of the Compact is Article V, providing for interstate rendition of juveniles who have escaped from confinement or have absconded from probation or parole supervision.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
In Re GAULT green
scotus · 1967
2 sentences

1988In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 , 87 S.Ct. 1428 , 18 L.Ed.2d 527 (1967) (juvenile defendant in a delinquency hearing entitled to counsel).

1988In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 , 87 S.Ct. 1428 , 18 L.Ed.2d 527 (1967) (juvenile defendant in a delinquency hearing entitled to counsel).

31981–1988
Rinker Appeal green
pasuperct · 1955
2 sentences

1981These procedures stem from the sensitive nature of the proceeding, viz: “to provide for the care, protection, and wholesome mental and physical development of children.” 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 6301(b)(1); Custody of Hernandez, 249 Pa.Super. 274 , 376 A.2d 648 (1977); cf. Rinker Appeal, 180 Pa.Super. 143 , 117 A.2d 780 (1955).

1981These procedures stem from the sensitive nature of the proceeding, viz: “to provide for the care, protection, and wholesome mental and physical development of children.” 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 6301(b)(1); Custody of Hernandez, 249 Pa.Super. 274 , 376 A.2d 648 (1977); cf. Rinker Appeal, 180 Pa.Super. 143 , 117 A.2d 780 (1955).

11981–1981
In Re Custody of Hernandez green
pasuperct · 1977
2 sentences

1981These procedures stem from the sensitive nature of the proceeding, viz: “to provide for the care, protection, and wholesome mental and physical development of children.” 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 6301(b)(1); Custody of Hernandez, 249 Pa.Super. 274 , 376 A.2d 648 (1977); cf. Rinker Appeal, 180 Pa.Super. 143 , 117 A.2d 780 (1955).

1981These procedures stem from the sensitive nature of the proceeding, viz: “to provide for the care, protection, and wholesome mental and physical development of children.” 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 6301(b)(1); Custody of Hernandez, 249 Pa.Super. 274 , 376 A.2d 648 (1977); cf. Rinker Appeal, 180 Pa.Super. 143 , 117 A.2d 780 (1955).

11981–1981
United States v. Pollard neutral
dcd · 1971
2 sentences

1976Cf. Coleman v. Burnett, 155 U.S.App.D.C. 302 , 477 F.2d 1187, 1210-1212 (1973); United States v. Pollard, 335 F.Supp. 868 (D.D.C.1971) (subsequent indictment does not bar affording preliminary hearing to defendant where official misconduct aborts preliminary hearing or renders it meaningless.)

1976Cf. Coleman v. Burnett, 155 U.S.App.D.C. 302 , 477 F.2d 1187, 1210-1212 (1973); United States v. Pollard, 335 F.Supp. 868 (D.D.C. 1971) (subsequent indictment does not bar affording preliminary hearing to defendant where official misconduct aborts preliminary hearing or renders it meaningless.) NOTES [1] Act of June 13, 1967, P.L. 31, No. 21, art. 7, § 731, 62 P.S. § 731. [2] The pertinent part of the Compact is Article V, providing for interstate rendition of juveniles who have escaped from confinement or have absconded from probation or parole supervision.

11976–1976
Coleman v. Alabama green
scotus · 1970
2 sentences

1972Cf. Coleman v. Alabama, 399 U.S. 1 , 26 L.

1972Cf. Coleman v. Alabama, 399 U.S. 1 , 26 L.

11972–1972

Where else courts name it

AL 10 (1926–2011) IL 9 (1977–2001) TX 9 (1978–2013) GA 8 (1998–2010) WI 7 (1981–2022) PA 6 (1972–2018) OH 6 (1969–2020) CA 6 (1969–2014) IN 4 (1974–2020) FL 4 (1969–2015) OK 3 (1974–1985) SD 3 (1997–1999) OR 3 (1970–1995) WA 3 (1968–1978) NY 3 (1978–2020) MD 2 (1974–1975) LA 2 (1980–1996) MS 2 (1968–1973) DC 2 (2014–2014) UT 2 (2001–2001) RI 2 (1976–2008) MN 2 (2002–2002) AK 2 (1974–2003) NM 2 (1943–2006)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check