delinquency hearing in Texas

2010To obtain habeas corpus relief for ineffective assistance of counsel under the Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668 (1984), standards, applicant must show that counsel's performance "was deficient and that a probability exists, sufficient to undermine our confidence in the result, that the outcome would have been different but for counsel['s] deficient performance." Amezquita , 223 S.W.3d at 366 (quoting Ex parte White , 160 S.W.3d 46, 49 (Tex. Crim.

2010To obtain habeas corpus relief for ineffective assistance of counsel under the Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), standards, applicant must show that counsel’s performance “was deficient and that a probability exists, sufficient to undermine our confidence in the result, that the outcome would have been different but for counsel[’s] deficient performance.” Amezquita, 223 S.W.3d at 366 (quoting Ex parte White, 160 S.W.3d 46, 49 (Tex. Crim.

2010To obtain habeas corpus relief for ineffective assistance of counsel under the Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668 (1984), standards, applicant must show that counsel's performance "was deficient and that a probability exists, sufficient to undermine our confidence in the result, that the outcome would have been different but for counsel['s] deficient performance." Amezquita , 223 S.W.3d at 366 (quoting Ex parte White , 160 S.W.3d 46, 49 (Tex. Crim.

2010To obtain habeas corpus relief for ineffective assistance of counsel under the Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), standards, applicant must show that counsel’s performance “was deficient and that a probability exists, sufficient to undermine our confidence in the result, that the outcome would have been different but for counsel[’s] deficient performance.” Amezquita, 223 S.W.3d at 366 (quoting Ex parte White, 160 S.W.3d 46, 49 (Tex. Crim.

1993Delinquency proceedings are sui generis, and the goal of the courts is to insure that the delinquency hearing is “conduct.ed with dignity and fairness and with the essentials of due process being observed.” In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 , 87 S.Ct. 1428 , 18 L.Ed.2d 527 (1967); State v. Santana, 444 S.W.2d 614, 617 (Tex.1969), judgm’t. vacated and cause remanded, 397 U.S. 596 , 90 S.Ct. 1350 , 25 L.Ed.2d 594 (1970), on remand, 457 S.W.2d 275 (Tex.1970); RAM., 599 S.W.2d at 846 .

1993Delinquency proceedings are sui generis, and the goal of the courts is to insure that the delinquency hearing is "conducted with dignity and fairness and with the essentials of due process being observed." In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 , 87 S.Ct. 1428 , 18 L.Ed.2d 527 (1967); State v. Santana, 444 S.W.2d 614, 617 (Tex.1969), judgm't. vacated and cause remanded, 397 U.S. 596 , 90 S.Ct. 1350 , 25 L.Ed.2d 594 (1970), on remand, 457 S.W.2d 275 (Tex. 1970); R.A.M., 599 S.W.2d at 846 .

1993Delinquency proceedings are sui generis, and the goal of the courts is to insure that the delinquency hearing is “conduct.ed with dignity and fairness and with the essentials of due process being observed.” In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 , 87 S.Ct. 1428 , 18 L.Ed.2d 527 (1967); State v. Santana, 444 S.W.2d 614, 617 (Tex.1969), judgm’t. vacated and cause remanded, 397 U.S. 596 , 90 S.Ct. 1350 , 25 L.Ed.2d 594 (1970), on remand, 457 S.W.2d 275 (Tex.1970); RAM., 599 S.W.2d at 846 .

1993Delinquency proceedings are sui generis, and the goal of the courts is to insure that the delinquency hearing is “conduct.ed with dignity and fairness and with the essentials of due process being observed.” In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 , 87 S.Ct. 1428 , 18 L.Ed.2d 527 (1967); State v. Santana, 444 S.W.2d 614, 617 (Tex.1969), judgm’t. vacated and cause remanded, 397 U.S. 596 , 90 S.Ct. 1350 , 25 L.Ed.2d 594 (1970), on remand, 457 S.W.2d 275 (Tex.1970); RAM., 599 S.W.2d at 846 .

1993Delinquency proceedings are sui generis, and the goal of the courts is to insure that the delinquency hearing is “conduct.ed with dignity and fairness and with the essentials of due process being observed.” In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 , 87 S.Ct. 1428 , 18 L.Ed.2d 527 (1967); State v. Santana, 444 S.W.2d 614, 617 (Tex.1969), judgm’t. vacated and cause remanded, 397 U.S. 596 , 90 S.Ct. 1350 , 25 L.Ed.2d 594 (1970), on remand, 457 S.W.2d 275 (Tex.1970); RAM., 599 S.W.2d at 846 .

1993Delinquency proceedings are sui generis, and the goal of the courts is to insure that the delinquency hearing is “conduct.ed with dignity and fairness and with the essentials of due process being observed.” In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 , 87 S.Ct. 1428 , 18 L.Ed.2d 527 (1967); State v. Santana, 444 S.W.2d 614, 617 (Tex.1969), judgm’t. vacated and cause remanded, 397 U.S. 596 , 90 S.Ct. 1350 , 25 L.Ed.2d 594 (1970), on remand, 457 S.W.2d 275 (Tex.1970); RAM., 599 S.W.2d at 846 .

1993Delinquency proceedings are sui generis, and the goal of the courts is to insure that the delinquency hearing is “conduct.ed with dignity and fairness and with the essentials of due process being observed.” In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 , 87 S.Ct. 1428 , 18 L.Ed.2d 527 (1967); State v. Santana, 444 S.W.2d 614, 617 (Tex.1969), judgm’t. vacated and cause remanded, 397 U.S. 596 , 90 S.Ct. 1350 , 25 L.Ed.2d 594 (1970), on remand, 457 S.W.2d 275 (Tex.1970); RAM., 599 S.W.2d at 846 .

1993Delinquency proceedings are sui generis, and the goal of the courts is to insure that the delinquency hearing is "conducted with dignity and fairness and with the essentials of due process being observed." In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 , 87 S.Ct. 1428 , 18 L.Ed.2d 527 (1967); State v. Santana, 444 S.W.2d 614, 617 (Tex.1969), judgm't. vacated and cause remanded, 397 U.S. 596 , 90 S.Ct. 1350 , 25 L.Ed.2d 594 (1970), on remand, 457 S.W.2d 275 (Tex. 1970); R.A.M., 599 S.W.2d at 846 .

1978As the Supreme Court of Washington stated in State v. Piche (1968), 74 Wash.2d 9 , 442 P.2d 632, 635 , cert. denied 393 U.S. 1041 , 89 S.Ct. 666 , 21 L.Ed.2d 588 (1969): "In determining whether the essentials of due process and fair treatment were provided in the instant case, it is important to keep in mind the exact nature of a juvenile court transfer (waiver) hearing.

1978As the Supreme Court of Washington stated in State v. Piche (1968), 74 Wash.2d 9 , 442 P.2d 632, 635 , cert. denied 393 U.S. 1041 , 89 S.Ct. 666 , 21 L.Ed.2d 588 (1969): "In determining whether the essentials of due process and fair treatment were provided in the instant case, it is important to keep in mind the exact nature of a juvenile court transfer (waiver) hearing.

1978As the Supreme Court of Washington stated in State v. Piche (1968), 74 Wash.2d 9 , 442 P.2d 632, 635 , cert. denied 393 U.S. 1041 , 89 S.Ct. 666 , 21 L.Ed.2d 588 (1969): "In determining whether the essentials of due process and fair treatment were provided in the instant case, it is important to keep in mind the exact nature of a juvenile court transfer (waiver) hearing.

1978As the Supreme Court of Washington stated in State v. Piche (1968), 74 Wash.2d 9 , 442 P.2d 632, 635 , cert. denied 393 U.S. 1041 , 89 S.Ct. 666 , 21 L.Ed.2d 588 (1969): "In determining whether the essentials of due process and fair treatment were provided in the instant case, it is important to keep in mind the exact nature of a juvenile court transfer (waiver) hearing.

1978As the Supreme Court of Washington stated in State v. Piche (1968), 74 Wash.2d 9 , 442 P.2d 632, 635 , cert. denied 393 U.S. 1041 , 89 S.Ct. 666 , 21 L.Ed.2d 588 (1969): "In determining whether the essentials of due process and fair treatment were provided in the instant case, it is important to keep in mind the exact nature of a juvenile court transfer (waiver) hearing.

1978As the Supreme Court of Washington stated in State v. Piche (1968), 74 Wash.2d 9 , 442 P.2d 632, 635 , cert. denied 393 U.S. 1041 , 89 S.Ct. 666 , 21 L.Ed.2d 588 (1969): “In determining whether the essentials of due process and fair treatment were provided in the instant case, it is important to keep in mind the exact nature of a juvenile court transfer (waiver) hearing.

2013Compliance with the written notice requirement of Section 209.008(a) is not a prerequisite to the recovery of attorney’s fees in this case because that section “does not apply to attorney’s fees incurred merely to collect delinquent assessment or enforce a lien due to nonpayment of the assessments.” Haas, 209 S.W.3d at 885 .

1980For example, in McKeiver v. Pennsylvania, 403 U.S. 528 , 91 S.Ct. 1976 , 29 L.Ed.2d 647 (1971), the right to a jury trial, although it rests on an express constitutional grant insofar as criminal cases are concerned, was withheld from juveniles even at the adjudicatory stage of delinquency proceedings.

1980For example, in McKeiver v. Pennsylvania, 403 U.S. 528 , 91 S.Ct. 1976 , 29 L.Ed.2d 647 (1971), the right to a jury trial, although it rests on an express constitutional grant insofar as criminal cases are concerned, was withheld from juveniles even at the adjudicatory stage of delinquency proceedings.