Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 California opinions name it 2 courts 1969–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re WINSHIPgreen2 sentences2014(In re Winship (1970) 397 U.S. 358, 368 [ 25 L.Ed.2d 368, 377-378 ].) “When the sufficiency of the evidence is challenged on appeal, we apply the familiar substantial evidence rule. 2014(In re Winship (1970) 397 U.S. 358, 368 [ 25 L.Ed.2d 368, 377-378 ].) “When the sufficiency of the evidence is challenged on appeal, we apply the familiar substantial evidence rule. | 2 | 2 |
People v. Overstreetgreen2 sentences2012The court reasoned: “This is not a case where criminal activity simply highlights a situation that results in removal from the home for reasons in the home; rather, the offenses appellant committed here placed him squarely and unavoidably within the delinquency exception of the ICWA.” (Id. at p. 734.) More to the point, the court observed that the minor’s interpretation of former Rule 1439 was in direct conflict with the federal statute on which it was based, “which is an untenable result.” (In re Enrique O., at p. 734.) Accordingly, the court refused to “interpret the California Rules of Cour 2012The court reasoned: “This is not a case where criminal activity simply highlights a situation that results in removal from the home for reasons in the home; rather, the offenses appellant committed here placed him squarely and unavoidably within the delinquency exception of the ICWA.” (Id. at p. 734.) More to the point, the court observed that the minor’s interpretation of former Rule 1439 was in direct conflict with the federal statute on which it was based, “which is an untenable result.” (In re Enrique O., at p. 734.) Accordingly, the court refused to “interpret the California Rules of Cour | 1 | 1 |
Breed v. Jonesgreen2 sentences1984(Breed v. Jones (1975) 421 U.S. 519, 526, 541 [ 44 L.Ed.2d 346, 362 , 95 S.Ct. 1779 ], citing Jones v. Breed (9th Cir. 1974) 497 F.2d 1160 , 1165.) 8 In Breed, the California juvenile court had conducted a delinquency hearing at which the court determined beyond a reasonable doubt that the minor had committed the robbery alleged in the petition. 1984(Breed v. Jones (1975) 421 U.S. 519, 526, 541 [ 44 L.Ed.2d 346, 362 , 95 S.Ct. 1779 ], citing Jones v. Breed (9th Cir. 1974) 497 F.2d 1160 , 1165.) 8 In Breed, the California juvenile court had conducted a delinquency hearing at which the court determined beyond a reasonable doubt that the minor had committed the robbery alleged in the petition. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Urbasek
green
2 sentences1969(See In re Urbasek, 38 Ill.2d 535 [ 232 N.E.2d 716 ]; Santana v. State (Texas Civ. 1969(See In re Urbasek, 38 Ill.2d 535 [ 232 N.E.2d 716 ]; Santana v. State (Texas Civ. | 2 | 1969–1969 |
Jones v. Breed
green
1 sentence1984(Breed v. Jones (1975) 421 U.S. 519, 526, 541 [ 44 L.Ed.2d 346, 362 , 95 S.Ct. 1779 ], citing Jones v. Breed (9th Cir. 1974) 497 F.2d 1160 , 1165.) 8 In Breed, the California juvenile court had conducted a delinquency hearing at which the court determined beyond a reasonable doubt that the minor had committed the robbery alleged in the petition. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.