Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Pennsylvania opinions name it 3 courts 1994–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Smith v. Board of Probation & Parolegreen1 sentence2016Freeman’s claim to the contrary lacks merit. 10 “[a]s long as the period of recommitment is within the presumptive range for the violation, the Commonwealth Court will not entertain challenges to the propriety of the term of recommitment.” Smith v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole, 574 A.2d 558, 560 (Pa. 1990). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Freemangreen2 sentences2004See id. at 403. 2004See id. at 403. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ramich ex rel. Ramich v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
green
2 sentences2023We read the WCJ’s finding that Claimant’s concurrent employment with Public Partnerships was “going on for a substantial period of time,” (FOF ¶ 12), not as the WCJ’s disregard of Freeman’s standard, but as a finding that this employment relationship was “sufficiently intact” as required by Linch, 746 A.2d at 1112 . 2023Even though Claimant may not have worked her Public Partnerships job on the day she was injured, there can be no reasonable argument that her employment relationship with Public Partnerships was not “sufficiently intact,” id., when the work injury occurred in December 2018, where the credited evidence showed that this relationship existed prior to her work with Employer, while she worked for Employer, and after she stopped working for Employer. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Commonwealth v. Horshaw
green
1 sentence2019In its Opinion, the trial court addressed and rejected Freeman’s claim as follows: “The Commonwealth … need not show the weapon to have been operable until evidence of its inoperability has been introduced into evidence.” Com[monwealth] v. Horshaw, … 346 A.2d 340 [, 342] ([Pa. Super.] 1975) (citation omitted). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Greenberg, M. v. McGraw, N.
green
1 sentence2018Greenberg v. McGraw, 161 A.3d 976 , 989 n.12 (Pa. Super. 2017). - 16 - J-A01041-18 Second, IMM argues the trial court properly dismissed the complaint because Freeman’s claim is barred by the Workers’ Compensation Act.10 See 77 P.S. § 1 et seq. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Walacavage v. Excell 2000, Inc.
green
1 sentence1994Because a corporation must be represented by counsel in any action and cannot represent itself, Walacavage v. Excell 2000, Inc., 331 Pa.Superior Ct. 137, 480 A.2d 281 (1984), this court will not address the arguments in Freeman’s brief. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.