Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
17 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Strickland v. Washingtongreen2 sentences2008See Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984); Hernandez v. State , 988 S.W.2d 770, 771-72 (Tex. Crim. 2008See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984); Hernandez v. State, 988 S.W.2d 770, 771-72 (Tex. Crim. | 2 | 4 |
Keller v. Stategreen2 sentences2011See Keller , 125 S.W.3d at 606-07 ; Bates , 88 S.W.3d at 727-28 ; Edwards , 37 S.W.3d at 515 . 2011See Keller , 125 S.W.3d at 606-07 ; Bates , 88 S.W.3d at 727-28 ; Edwards , 37 S.W.3d at 515 . | 2 | 2 |
Hernandez v. Stategreen2 sentences2008See Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984); Hernandez v. State , 988 S.W.2d 770, 771-72 (Tex. Crim. 2008See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984); Hernandez v. State, 988 S.W.2d 770, 771-72 (Tex. Crim. | 2 | 2 |
Buntion v. Harmongreen2 sentences2008See Buntion , 827 S.W.2d at 946 (writ of mandamus to prevent attorney's removal from case is "normal vehicle" for seeking relief); see also Stotts v. Wisser , 894 S.W.2d 366, 367 (Tex. Crim. 2008See Buntion, 827 S.W.2d at 946 (writ of mandamus to prevent attorney’s removal from case is “normal vehicle” for seeking relief); see also Stotts v. Wisser, 894 S.W.2d 366, 367 (Tex. Crim. | 2 | 2 |
Stotts v. Wissergreen2 sentences2008See Buntion , 827 S.W.2d at 946 (writ of mandamus to prevent attorney's removal from case is "normal vehicle" for seeking relief); see also Stotts v. Wisser , 894 S.W.2d 366, 367 (Tex. Crim. 2008See Buntion, 827 S.W.2d at 946 (writ of mandamus to prevent attorney’s removal from case is “normal vehicle” for seeking relief); see also Stotts v. Wisser, 894 S.W.2d 366, 367 (Tex. Crim. | 2 | 2 |
Bates v. Stategreen2 sentences2011See Keller , 125 S.W.3d at 606-07 ; Bates , 88 S.W.3d at 727-28 ; Edwards , 37 S.W.3d at 515 . 2011See Keller , 125 S.W.3d at 606-07 ; Bates , 88 S.W.3d at 727-28 ; Edwards , 37 S.W.3d at 515 . | 1 | 2 |
Brooks v. Stategreen1 sentence2025See Brooks v. State, 323 S.W.3d 893, 895 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Freeman v. Cherokee Water Co.green1 sentence2022Freeman v. Cherokee Water Co., 11 S.W.3d 480, 483 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2000, pet. denied). | 1 | 1 |
Johnson & Higgins of Texas, Inc. v. Kenneco Energy, Inc.red1 sentence2022See, e.g., Johnson & Higgins of Tex., Inc. v. Kenneco Energy, Inc., 962 S.W.2d 507, 524 (Tex. 1998). | 1 | 1 |
Taylor v. Stategreen1 sentence2018See id. at 502 .1 Accordingly, we 1 The State argues that this Court should overrule Freeman's issue and require him to file a motion to modify or for a nunc pro tunc in the trial court, which is a remedy that this Court has suggested but not required as a more efficient remedy in previous appeals. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Savagegreen1 sentence2018See, e.g., State v. Savage, 933 S.W.2d 497, 499 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. Mirandagreen1 sentence2018The political question doctrine requires us to be mindful of the broader implications of reviewing sensitive military decisions, such as maintaining respect for the separation of powers and the federalism system outlined in the United States Constitution, 76 See post at __ (Devine, J., dissenting). 77 Post at __ (Guzman, J., dissenting); post at __ (Devine, J., dissenting); see Tex. Dep’t of Parks & Wildlife v. Miranda, 133 S.W.3d 217 , 227–228 (Tex. 2004) (“If the evidence creates a fact question regarding the jurisdictional issue, then the trial court cannot grant the plea to the jurisdictio | 1 | 1 |
United States Department of Commerce v. Montanagreen1 sentence2018The political question doctrine requires us to be mindful of the broader implications of reviewing sensitive military decisions, such as maintaining respect for the separation of powers and the federalism system outlined in the United States Constitution, 76 See post at __ (Devine, J., dissenting). 77 Post at __ (Guzman, J., dissenting); post at __ (Devine, J., dissenting); see Tex. Dep’t of Parks & Wildlife v. Miranda, 133 S.W.3d 217 , 227–228 (Tex. 2004) (“If the evidence creates a fact question regarding the jurisdictional issue, then the trial court cannot grant the plea to the jurisdictio | 1 | 1 |
Baker v. Kunzmangreen2 sentences2002See Baker v. Kunzman, 873 S.W.2d 753, 755 (Tex.App.-Tyler 1994, writ denied). 2002See Baker v. Kunzman, 873 S.W.2d 753, 755 (Tex.App.-Tyler 1994, writ denied). | 1 | 1 |
Strackbein v. Prewittgreen2 sentences2002Strackbein v. Prewitt, 671 S.W.2d 37, 38 (Tex.1984). 2002Strackbein v. Prewitt, 671 S.W.2d 37, 38 (Tex. 1984). | 1 | 1 |
Thomas v. Stategreen1 sentence1997See Thomas v. State , 723 S.W.2d 696, 700 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Duncan v. Cessna Aircraft Co.red1 sentence1994The pattern jury charge also refers to the plaintiff's misuse of a defective product or the failure to mitigate or avoid damages, citing Duncan v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 665 S.W.2d 414, 428 (Tex.1984). [3] These rules apply when the meaning of a jury finding is unclear. | 1 | 1 |
Suber Ex Rel. Suber v. Ohio Medical Products, Inc.green2 sentences1994The family members' loss of support claim is subsumed within Mr. Freeman's claim for loss of future earning capacity. [4] See Suber v. Ohio Medical Prods., Inc., 811 S.W.2d 646, 657 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1991, writ denied) (Ellis, J. dissenting). 1994The family members’ loss of support claim is subsumed within Mr. Freeman’s claim for loss of future earning capacity. 4 See Suber v. Ohio Medical Prods., Inc., 811 S.W.2d 646, 657 (Tex.App. — Houston [14th Dist.] 1991, writ denied) (Ellis, J. dissenting). | 1 | 1 |
Westinghouse Credit Corporation v. Kownslargreen2 sentences1987The supreme court has indicated by its reasoning in Westinghouse Credit Corp. v. Kownslar, 496 S.W.2d 531, 532 (Tex.1973), that the Freeman doctrine is to be interpreted narrowly and is not to be applied to new cases unless directly on point. 1987The supreme court has indicated by its reasoning in Westinghouse Credit Corp. v. Kownslar, 496 S.W.2d 531, 532 (Tex.1973), that the Freeman doctrine is to be interpreted narrowly and is not to be applied to new cases unless directly on point. | 1 | 1 |
Abbott Laboratories v. Gravisgreen2 sentences1987Freeman v. McAninch, 87 Tex. 132 , 27 S.W. 97 (1894).” Abbott Laboratories v. Gravis, 470 S.W.2d 639, 642 (Tex.1971) (hereinafter the Freeman doctrine). 1987Freeman v. McAninch, 87 Tex. 132 , 27 S.W. 97 (1894).” Abbott Laboratories v. Gravis, 470 S.W.2d 639, 642 (Tex.1971) (hereinafter the Freeman doctrine). | 1 | 1 |
Gilbert v. Fireside Enterprises, Inc.green2 sentences1987See Gilbert, 611 S.W.2d at 876 . 1987See Gilbert, 611 S.W.2d at 876 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Edwards v. State
green
2 sentences2011See Keller , 125 S.W.3d at 606-07 ; Bates , 88 S.W.3d at 727-28 ; Edwards , 37 S.W.3d at 515 . 2011See Keller , 125 S.W.3d at 606-07 ; Bates , 88 S.W.3d at 727-28 ; Edwards , 37 S.W.3d at 515 . | 2 | 2005–2011 |
Bone v. State
green
2 sentences2003Strickland , 466 U.S. at 687 ; Bone , 77 S.W.3d at 833 ; Hernandez , 726 S.W.2d at 55 . 2002Strickland, 466 U.S. at 687 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 ; Bone, 77 S.W.3d at 833 ; Hernandez, 726 S.W.2d at 55 . | 2 | 2002–2003 |
Hernandez v. State
green
2 sentences2003Strickland , 466 U.S. at 687 ; Bone , 77 S.W.3d at 833 ; Hernandez , 726 S.W.2d at 55 . 2002Strickland, 466 U.S. at 687 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 ; Bone, 77 S.W.3d at 833 ; Hernandez, 726 S.W.2d at 55 . | 2 | 2002–2003 |
Jackson v. Virginia
red
2 sentences2025However, that is no longer the rule.6 See Mayweather 6 Freeman’s brief also argues that the State failed to provide factually sufficient evidence to prove the requisite mental state, but the Court of Criminal Appeals has held when challenging the sufficiency of the evidence to support an element of an offense, the legal sufficiency standard set out in Jackson, 443 U.S. 307 at 319 , 99 S. Ct. at 2789 , is the only standard that applies. 2025However, that is no longer the rule.6 See Mayweather 6 Freeman’s brief also argues that the State failed to provide factually sufficient evidence to prove the requisite mental state, but the Court of Criminal Appeals has held when challenging the sufficiency of the evidence to support an element of an offense, the legal sufficiency standard set out in Jackson, 443 U.S. 307 at 319 , 99 S. Ct. at 2789 , is the only standard that applies. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Reagan v. Vaughn
green
1 sentence1994Reagan, 804 S.W.2d at 468 . [13] Upjohn moved for a directed verdict on Freeman's claim for loss of future earning capacity on the basis of legally insufficient evidence. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Tectonic Realty Investment Co. v. CNA Lloyd's of Texas Insurance Co.
green
2 sentences1994Cf. Tectonic, 812 S.W.2d at 654 . 1994Cf. Tectonic, 812 S.W.2d at 654 . | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Ex Parte Windham
green
1 sentence1990In his brief, appellant acknowledges that an accused’s right to select his own counsel cannot be manipulated so as to obstruct the orderly procedure in the courts or to interfere with the fair administration of justice, citing Ex parte Windham, 634 S.W.2d 718 (Tex.Crim.App.1982), and other cases. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Freeman v. McAninch
green
2 sentences1987Freeman v. McAninch, 87 Tex. 132 , 27 S.W. 97 (1894).” Abbott Laboratories v. Gravis, 470 S.W.2d 639, 642 (Tex.1971) (hereinafter the Freeman doctrine). 1987Freeman v. McAninch, 87 Tex. 132 , 27 S.W. 97 (1894).” Abbott Laboratories v. Gravis, 470 S.W.2d 639, 642 (Tex.1971) (hereinafter the Freeman doctrine). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.