location test (Pennsylvania) · Go Syfert
← Pennsylvania issues

location test in Pennsylvania

6 Pennsylvania opinions name it 3 courts 1931–2016 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Commonwealth v. McCoygreen
pa · 2009 · cited in 2 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2015–2016
2 sentences

2016Commonwealth v. McCoy, 962 A.2d 1160, 1169 (Pa. 2009). -7- J-S54041-16 control, sell, transfer or manufacture a firearm in the State of Pennsylvania.” N.T., 01/12/16, at 10-11.

2015Commonwealth v. McCoy, 962 A.2d 1160, 1169 (Pa. 2009).

22

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
Gilberti v. City of Pittsburgh green
pa · 1986
2 sentences

2013To resolve this particular question, the Supreme Court reflected upon the location where the privilege is exercised, and, citing earlier precedent, opined that when a taxing authority “imposes a tax upon a privilege, the tax cannot be levied directly upon exercises of the privilege that occur outside of the taxing district.” Id. at 108 , 511 A.2d at 1325 .

2013To resolve this particular question, the Supreme Court reflected upon the location where the privilege is exercised, and, citing earlier precedent, opined that when a taxing authority “imposes a tax upon a privilege, the tax cannot be levied directly upon exercises of the privilege that occur outside of the taxing district.” Id. at 108 , 511 A.2d at 1325 .

12013–2013
Commonwealth v. Bloom green
pasuperct · 2009
2 sentences

2010In Commonwealth v. Bloom, 979 A.2d 368 (Pa.Super.2009), the Superior Court held that a Port Authority police officer had primary jurisdiction to stop a defendant that committed a traffic violation.

2010In Commonwealth v. Bloom, 979 A.2d 368 (Pa.Super.2009), the Superior Court held that a Port Authority police officer had primary jurisdiction to stop a defendant that committed a traffic violation.

12010–2010
Commonwealth v. Guarino neutral
pacommwct · 1975
2 sentences

1986The trial court relied upon Maffei v. Department of Transportation, 53 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 182 , 416 A.2d 1167 (1980), in which the driver at all times agreed to take the test but refused to sign a hospital release, and Department of Transportation, Bureau of Traffic Safety v. Guarino, 19 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 104 , 339 A.2d 861 (1975), in which the driver remained mute throughout all questioning and was never transported by the police to the location of the test.

1986The trial court relied upon Maffei v. Department of Transportation, 53 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 182 , 416 A.2d 1167 (1980), in which the driver at all times agreed to take the test but refused to sign a hospital release, and Department of Transportation, Bureau of Traffic Safety v. Guarino, 19 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 104 , 339 A.2d 861 (1975), in which the driver remained mute throughout all questioning and was never transported by the police to the location of the test.

11986–1986
Maffei v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation green
pacommwct · 1980
2 sentences

1986The trial court relied upon Maffei v. Department of Transportation, 53 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 182 , 416 A.2d 1167 (1980), in which the driver at all times agreed to take the test but refused to sign a hospital release, and Department of Transportation, Bureau of Traffic Safety v. Guarino, 19 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 104 , 339 A.2d 861 (1975), in which the driver remained mute throughout all questioning and was never transported by the police to the location of the test.

1986The trial court relied upon Maffei v. Department of Transportation, 53 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 182 , 416 A.2d 1167 (1980), in which the driver at all times agreed to take the test but refused to sign a hospital release, and Department of Transportation, Bureau of Traffic Safety v. Guarino, 19 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 104 , 339 A.2d 861 (1975), in which the driver remained mute throughout all questioning and was never transported by the police to the location of the test.

11986–1986
Stevens v. Garland neutral
mich · 1917
2 sentences

1931There was evidence of “the presence on the property of steam shovels, the location of test holes, the driving of stakes and other work of a similar nature.” The trial court found “that these matters and things, under all the evidence in the case, did not constitute a beginning of the construction or a commencement of the work and improvement.” The court of appeals held that this was not error, stating: “We also cite the following authorities: Drawing plans and specifications not a commencement: Stevens v. Garland, 198 Mich. 24 , 164 N. W. 516 .

1931There was evidence of “the presence on the property of steam shovels, the location of test holes, the driving of stakes and other work of a similar nature.” The trial court found “that these matters and things, under all the evidence in the case, did not constitute a beginning of the construction or a commencement of the work and improvement.” The court of appeals held that this was not error, stating: “We also cite the following authorities: Drawing plans and specifications not a commencement: Stevens v. Garland, 198 Mich. 24 , 164 N. W. 516 .

11931–1931

Where else courts name it

CA 23 (1911–2025) TX 16 (1903–2015) IL 13 (1999–2023) NY 11 (1987–2025) GA 9 (1982–2015) MT 8 (1891–2018) IN 7 (2012–2018) MO 7 (1946–2024) ND 7 (1992–2012) OR 6 (1892–2024) PA 6 (1931–2016) LA 6 (2002–2013) OH 5 (1995–2022) NE 5 (2000–2007) MI 4 (1893–2019) FL 4 (1983–2018) SD 4 (1905–2016) ID 3 (1889–1911) MN 3 (1999–2003) CO 3 (1901–1996) NJ 3 (1962–1994) OK 3 (1981–2023) AR 2 (1902–1989) KS 2 (1971–1978) TN 2 (1982–2023) IA 2 (2015–2015) NV 2 (1944–1965) RI 2 (2009–2010) HI 2 (2010–2011) CT 2 (1962–2007) NM 2 (1907–1939) MA 2 (1929–1981) ME 2 (1921–2006) WA 2 (1926–2022)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check