Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1946–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Rundquist v. Director of Revenuegreen1 sentence2024Rundquist v. Dir. of Revenue, 62 S.W.3d 643, 646 (Mo. App. E.D. 2001). | 1 | 1 |
West v. Jacobsgreen1 sentence1992The standard of review and rules regarding policy ambiguity are as follows: 1) whether or not language is ambiguous is a question of law for the trial court, West v. Jacobs, 790 S.W.2d 475, 480 (Mo.App.1990); 2) in determining whether the trial court has erred as a matter of law in interpreting the contract as unambiguous, Anchor Centre Partners Ltd. v. Mercantile Bank, N.A., 803 S.W.2d 23, 32 (Mo. banc 1991), the appellate court reviews the policy itself to determine if any ambiguity exists, Maryland Casualty Co. v. Martinez, 812 S.W.2d 876, 881 (Mo.App.1991); 3) the language in question is a | 1 | 1 |
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Martinezgreen1 sentence1992The standard of review and rules regarding policy ambiguity are as follows: 1) whether or not language is ambiguous is a question of law for the trial court, West v. Jacobs, 790 S.W.2d 475, 480 (Mo.App.1990); 2) in determining whether the trial court has erred as a matter of law in interpreting the contract as unambiguous, Anchor Centre Partners Ltd. v. Mercantile Bank, N.A., 803 S.W.2d 23, 32 (Mo. banc 1991), the appellate court reviews the policy itself to determine if any ambiguity exists, Maryland Casualty Co. v. Martinez, 812 S.W.2d 876, 881 (Mo.App.1991); 3) the language in question is a | 1 | 1 |
Anchor Centre Partners, Ltd. v. Mercantile Bank, N.A.green1 sentence1992The standard of review and rules regarding policy ambiguity are as follows: 1) whether or not language is ambiguous is a question of law for the trial court, West v. Jacobs, 790 S.W.2d 475, 480 (Mo.App.1990); 2) in determining whether the trial court has erred as a matter of law in interpreting the contract as unambiguous, Anchor Centre Partners Ltd. v. Mercantile Bank, N.A., 803 S.W.2d 23, 32 (Mo. banc 1991), the appellate court reviews the policy itself to determine if any ambiguity exists, Maryland Casualty Co. v. Martinez, 812 S.W.2d 876, 881 (Mo.App.1991); 3) the language in question is a | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Leonard David Griffin
green
1 sentence2003Id. at 1348 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Homan v. Hutchison
green
1 sentence1996While Teson , cited by Dillon , is an adverse possession case, Homan v. Hutchison, 817 S.W.2d 944 (Mo.App.1991), explains how the location requirement is equally applicable in prescriptive easement cases: "The method by which prescriptive rights are acquired is akin to the acquisition of title to real estate by adverse possession.... | 1 | 1996–1996 |
North Shaker Boulevard Co. v. Harriman Natl. Bank
green
2 sentences1967Bank, 22 Ohio App. 487 , 153 N.E. 909 , the presence of steam shovels on the property, the location of test holes, the driving of stakes and other work of similar nature, and in Rupp v. Cline & Sons, Inc., 230 Md. 573 , 188 A.2d 146 , 1 A.L.R. 3d 815 , grading and leveling the lot, were held insufficient to constitute “commencement” of the building. 1967Bank, 22 Ohio App. 487 , 153 N.E. 909 , the presence of steam shovels on the property, the location of test holes, the driving of stakes and other work of similar nature, and in Rupp v. Cline & Sons, Inc., 230 Md. 573 , 188 A.2d 146 , 1 A.L.R. 3d 815 , grading and leveling the lot, were held insufficient to constitute “commencement” of the building. | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Rupp v. Earl H. Cline & Sons, Inc.
green
2 sentences1967Bank, 22 Ohio App. 487 , 153 N.E. 909 , the presence of steam shovels on the property, the location of test holes, the driving of stakes and other work of similar nature, and in Rupp v. Cline & Sons, Inc., 230 Md. 573 , 188 A.2d 146 , 1 A.L.R. 3d 815 , grading and leveling the lot, were held insufficient to constitute “commencement” of the building. 1967Bank, 22 Ohio App. 487 , 153 N.E. 909 , the presence of steam shovels on the property, the location of test holes, the driving of stakes and other work of similar nature, and in Rupp v. Cline & Sons, Inc., 230 Md. 573 , 188 A.2d 146 , 1 A.L.R. 3d 815 , grading and leveling the lot, were held insufficient to constitute “commencement” of the building. | 1 | 1967–1967 |
City of Richmond v. Board of Supervisors
green
2 sentences1962In City of Richmond v. Board of Supervisors, 199 Va. 679 , 101 S.E.2d 641 , it was held that statutes granting the City of Richmond the right to establish a jail beyond its corporate limits did not authorize the city to choose a location in violation of the county’s zoning laws. 1962In City of Richmond v. Board of Supervisors, 199 Va. 679 , 101 S.E.2d 641 , it was held that statutes granting the City of Richmond the right to establish a jail beyond its corporate limits did not authorize the city to choose a location in violation of the county’s zoning laws. | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Rombauer v. Compton Heights Christian Church
green
2 sentences1946The trial court found that “the contention that the character of the neighborhood has so changed as to defeat the purpose of the covenant is not sustained by the evidence.” The Court further found “the church is an asset to the neighborhood and damages no one ’ ’; and that “the inconvenience it may cause to a few persons by reason of automobiles being parked along the street is trivial.” Nevertheless, the Court decided that the maintenance, of the church at this location was a violation of the restrictions under our decisions in Rombauer v. Compton Heights Christian Church, 328 Mo. 1 , 40 S. W 1946The trial court found that “the contention that the character of the neighborhood has so changed as to defeat the purpose of the covenant is not sustained by the evidence.” The Court further found “the church is an asset to the neighborhood and damages no one ’ ’; and that “the inconvenience it may cause to a few persons by reason of automobiles being parked along the street is trivial.” Nevertheless, the Court decided that the maintenance, of the church at this location was a violation of the restrictions under our decisions in Rombauer v. Compton Heights Christian Church, 328 Mo. 1 , 40 S. W | 1 | 1946–1946 |
Britton v. School District of University City
green
2 sentences1946The trial court found that “the contention that the character of the neighborhood has so changed as to defeat the purpose of the covenant is not sustained by the evidence.” The Court further found “the church is an asset to the neighborhood and damages no one ’ ’; and that “the inconvenience it may cause to a few persons by reason of automobiles being parked along the street is trivial.” Nevertheless, the Court decided that the maintenance, of the church at this location was a violation of the restrictions under our decisions in Rombauer v. Compton Heights Christian Church, 328 Mo. 1 , 40 S. W 1946The trial court found that “the contention that the character of the neighborhood has so changed as to defeat the purpose of the covenant is not sustained by the evidence.” The Court further found “the church is an asset to the neighborhood and damages no one ’ ’; and that “the inconvenience it may cause to a few persons by reason of automobiles being parked along the street is trivial.” Nevertheless, the Court decided that the maintenance, of the church at this location was a violation of the restrictions under our decisions in Rombauer v. Compton Heights Christian Church, 328 Mo. 1 , 40 S. W | 1 | 1946–1946 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.