Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 2002–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Empire Sanitary Landfill, Inc. v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences2014Id. at 1054. 2014Id. at 1054 . | 1 | 2 |
In Re Dauphin County Fourth Investigating Grand Jurygreen2 sentences2011The Board's compliance has assured that its challenge did not delay the proceedings of the grand jury; and there is no suggestion that the record is inadequate to decide the purely legal privilege questions presented. [2] Moreover, to the extent that review here could be said to "circumvent the typical path of challenging a subpoena," In re Dauphin County Fourth Investigating *1139 Grand Jury, 596 Pa. 378 , 943 A.2d 929, 935 (2007), for the reasons I have already expressed, I do not believe that the Hobson's choice is appropriate here, and the overarching issue is of great importance and capab 2011The Board's compliance has assured that its challenge did not delay the proceedings of the grand jury; and there is no suggestion that the record is inadequate to decide the purely legal privilege questions presented. [2] Moreover, to the extent that review here could be said to "circumvent the typical path of challenging a subpoena," In re Dauphin County Fourth Investigating *1139 Grand Jury, 596 Pa. 378 , 943 A.2d 929, 935 (2007), for the reasons I have already expressed, I do not believe that the Hobson's choice is appropriate here, and the overarching issue is of great importance and capab | 1 | 1 |
Steuart v. McChesneygreen2 sentences2002See Steuart, 444 A.2d at 662 . 2002See Steuart, 444 A.2d at 662 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. City of Philadelphia
green
1 sentence2023Stadium Casino cites to Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. City of Philadelphia, 101 A.3d 79 (Pa. 2014) (SEPTA), to support its position. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Commonwealth v. Ogontz Area Neighbors Ass'n
green
2 sentences2015The Supreme Court also agreed that SEPTA is a Commonwealth agency. 11 However, it concluded that this Court failed to do the legislative intent analysis announced in Department of General Services v. Ogontz Area Neighbors Association, 505 Pa. 614 , 483 A.2d 448 (1984), and used to determine when a state agency may be regulated by a local agency. 12 The Supreme Court stated as follows: In conclusion, although the • Commonwealth Court correctly determined that SEPTA was not required in this instance to exhaust its administrative remedies before commencin'g this declaratory judgment action, it er 2015The Supreme Court also agreed that SEPTA is a Commonwealth agency. 11 However, it concluded that this Court failed to do the legislative intent analysis announced in Department of General Services v. Ogontz Area Neighbors Association, 505 Pa. 614 , 483 A.2d 448 (1984), and used to determine when a state agency may be regulated by a local agency. 12 The Supreme Court stated as follows: In conclusion, although the • Commonwealth Court correctly determined that SEPTA was not required in this instance to exhaust its administrative remedies before commencin'g this declaratory judgment action, it er | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.