6 South Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1972–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by South Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Clinkscalesgreen2 sentences2020See State v. Clinkscales, 318 S.C. 513, 515 , 458 S.E.2d 548, 549 (1995) ("A defendant's Sixth Amendment right to assistance of counsel attaches at all critical stages of a criminal prosecution. 2020See State v. Clinkscales, 318 S.C. 513, 515 , 458 S.E.2d 548, 549 (1995) ("A defendant's Sixth Amendment right to assistance of counsel attaches at all critical stages of a criminal prosecution. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Harrisgreen2 sentences2020See State v. Harris, 391 S.C. 539, 544-45 , 706 S.E.2d 526, 529 (Ct. App. 2011) ("'A motion for a new trial based on after-discovered evidence is addressed to the sound discretion of the [circuit court]. 2020See State v. Harris, 391 S.C. 539, 544-45 , 706 S.E.2d 526, 529 (Ct. App. 2011) ("'A motion for a new trial based on after-discovered evidence is addressed to the sound discretion of the [circuit court]. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Howardgreen2 sentences2017See State v. Howard , 296 S.C. 481 , 485, 374 S.E.2d 284 , 286 (1988). 2017See State v. Howard , 296 S.C. 481 , 485, 374 S.E.2d 284 , 286 (1988). | 1 | 1 |
Graham v. Floridagreen2 sentences2015See Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48, 78 , 130 S.Ct. 2011 , 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010) (noting the features distinguishing juveniles from adults that put young defendants at a significant disadvantage in criminal proceedings: “[Young defendants] mistrust adults and have limited understandings of the criminal justice system and the roles of the institutional actors within it. 2015See Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48, 78 , 130 S.Ct. 2011 , 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010) (noting the features distinguishing juveniles from adults that put young defendants at a significant disadvantage in criminal proceedings: “[Young defendants] mistrust adults and have limited understandings of the criminal justice system and the roles of the institutional actors within it. | 1 | 1 |
Young v. South Carolina Department of Correctionsgreen2 sentences2001Young, 333 S.C. at 719-20 , 511 S.E.2d at 416-17 (citations omitted). 2001Young, 333 S.C. at 719-20 , 511 S.E.2d at 416-17 (citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Tucker
green
1 sentence2017In Tucker, the State used all six of its preemptory strikes against black jurors. 334 S.C. at 8, 512 S.E.2d at 102 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. Green
green
1 sentence1972In State v. Durham, 89 S. C. 134, 71 S. E. 847 (1911), this court held, under a similar statute, that a sentence in the alternative was required. | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.