Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1971–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Traweek v. Larkingreen1 sentence2010Traweek v. Larkin, 708 S.W.2d 942, 945 (Tex.App.-Tyler 1986, writ ref d n.r.e.). | 1 | 1 |
City of Houston v. Houston Chronicle Publishing Co.green2 sentences1997Scurlock Oil Co. v. Smithwick, 787 S.W.2d 560, 562 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1990, no writ); City of Houston v. Houston Chronicle Publishing Co., 673 S.W.2d 316, 321 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1984, no writ); Kveton v. Farmers Royalty Holding Co., 149 S.W.2d 998, 1000 (Tex.Civ.App.—Galveston 1941, no writ). *847 We address Avila's first two points challenging the trial court's sustaining of St. 1997Scurlock Oil Co. v. Smithwick, 787 S.W.2d 560, 562 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1990, no writ); City of Houston v. Houston Chronicle Publishing Co., 673 S.W.2d 316, 321 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1984, no writ); Kveton v. Fanners Royalty Holding Co., 149 S.W.2d 998, 1000 (Tex.Civ.App.—Galveston 1941, no writ). | 1 | 1 |
Kveton v. Farmers Royalty Holding Co.green2 sentences1997Scurlock Oil Co. v. Smithwick, 787 S.W.2d 560, 562 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1990, no writ); City of Houston v. Houston Chronicle Publishing Co., 673 S.W.2d 316, 321 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1984, no writ); Kveton v. Farmers Royalty Holding Co., 149 S.W.2d 998, 1000 (Tex.Civ.App.—Galveston 1941, no writ). *847 We address Avila's first two points challenging the trial court's sustaining of St. 1997Scurlock Oil Co. v. Smithwick, 787 S.W.2d 560, 562 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1990, no writ); City of Houston v. Houston Chronicle Publishing Co., 673 S.W.2d 316, 321 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1984, no writ); Kveton v. Fanners Royalty Holding Co., 149 S.W.2d 998, 1000 (Tex.Civ.App.—Galveston 1941, no writ). | 1 | 1 |
Green v. Stategreen1 sentence1997Israel, Criminal Procedure § 17.4, p. 384 (1984) (stating that collateral estoppel does not interfere with the State’s prosecution of someone for murder, for instance, after it unsuccessfully attempted to revoke probation based upon the same offense “for the reason that no jeopardy attached at the revocation proceeding”); Green v. State, 463 So.2d 1139, 1140 (Fla.1985) (holding that because “petitioner was not subjected to conviction or punishment for his new criminal conduct [via a probation revocation hearing] ... the dou *158 ble jeopardy clause through the doctrine of collateral estoppel i | 1 | 1 |
Scurlock Oil Co. v. Smithwickgreen2 sentences1997Scurlock Oil Co. v. Smithwick, 787 S.W.2d 560, 562 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1990, no writ); City of Houston v. Houston Chronicle Publishing Co., 673 S.W.2d 316, 321 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1984, no writ); Kveton v. Farmers Royalty Holding Co., 149 S.W.2d 998, 1000 (Tex.Civ.App.—Galveston 1941, no writ). *847 We address Avila's first two points challenging the trial court's sustaining of St. 1997Scurlock Oil Co. v. Smithwick, 787 S.W.2d 560, 562 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1990, no writ); City of Houston v. Houston Chronicle Publishing Co., 673 S.W.2d 316, 321 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1984, no writ); Kveton v. Fanners Royalty Holding Co., 149 S.W.2d 998, 1000 (Tex.Civ.App.—Galveston 1941, no writ). | 1 | 1 |
Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.green2 sentences1971See Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corporation, 349 U.S. 322 , 75 S.Ct. 865 , 99 L.Ed. 1122 (1955); United States v. International Bldg. 1971See Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corporation, 349 U.S. 322 , 75 S.Ct. 865 , 99 L.Ed. 1122 (1955); United States v. International Bldg. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Raymond Showery v. Leo Samaniego, Sheriff, El Paso County, Texas
green
1 sentence1997Israel, Criminal Procedure § 17.4, p. 384 (1984) (stating that collateral estoppel does not interfere with the State’s prosecution of someone for murder, for instance, after it unsuccessfully attempted to revoke probation based upon the same offense “for the reason that no jeopardy attached at the revocation proceeding”); Green v. State, 463 So.2d 1139, 1140 (Fla.1985) (holding that because “petitioner was not subjected to conviction or punishment for his new criminal conduct [via a probation revocation hearing] ... the dou *158 ble jeopardy clause through the doctrine of collateral estoppel i | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Ex Parte Schuessler
green
1 sentence1994In addition, we note that the recent ease of Ex parte Schuessler, 846 S.W.2d 850 (Tex.Crim.App.1993), also involves a sanity finding that is against the great weight and preponderance of the evidence. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Sutton v. State
green
2 sentences1981This Court, in Sutton v. State, 495 S.W.2d 912 (Tex.Cr.App.1972), dealt with a contention similar to the one presented by this appeal. 1981This Court, in Sutton v. State, 495 S.W.2d 912 (Tex.Cr.App.1972), dealt with a contention similar to the one presented by this appeal. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.