corrective instruction (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

corrective instruction in Texas

6 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1981–2015 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
Bray v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 1972 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1989–1989
2 sentences

1989Bray v. State, 478 S.W.2d 89, 90 (Tex.Crim.App. 1972).

1989See Bray v. State, 478 S.W.2d 89, 90 (Tex.Crim.App.1972).

22
Howard v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 1972 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1981–1989
2 sentences

1989Eckert, supra, at 364 ; Broussard v. State, 505 S.W.2d 282, 285 (Tex.Crim.App.1974); Howard v. State, 484 S.W.2d 903, 905 (Tex.Crim.App.1972).

1981Broussard, supra; Thompson v. State, 486 S.W.2d 343 (Tex.Cr.App.); Howard v. State, 484 S.W.2d 903 (Tex.Cr.App.).

12
Broussard v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 1974 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1981–1989
2 sentences

1989Eckert, supra, at 364 ; Broussard v. State, 505 S.W.2d 282, 285 (Tex.Crim.App.1974); Howard v. State, 484 S.W.2d 903, 905 (Tex.Crim.App.1972).

1981Broussard, supra; Thompson v. State, 486 S.W.2d 343 (Tex.Cr.App.); Howard v. State, 484 S.W.2d 903 (Tex.Cr.App.).

12
Dow Chemical Co. v. Francisgreen
tex · 2001 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
1 sentence

2015See Francis, 46 S.W.3d at 241 .

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Young v. State green
texcrimapp · 2004
2 sentences

2010In Young, the court of criminal appeals reviewed the purpose behind a trial court’s corrective instruction: “[A]n instruction to disregard attempts to cure any harm or prejudice resulting from events that have already occurred.” Id. at 69 .

2010Importantly for this case, “[W]here the prejudice is curable, an instruction eliminates the need for a mistrial, thereby conserving the resources associated with beginning the trial process anew.” Id.

12010–2010
Eckert v. State green
texcrimapp · 1981
1 sentence

1989Eckert, supra, at 364 ; Broussard v. State, 505 S.W.2d 282, 285 (Tex.Crim.App.1974); Howard v. State, 484 S.W.2d 903, 905 (Tex.Crim.App.1972).

11989–1989
Thompson v. State green
texcrimapp · 1972
2 sentences

1981Broussard, supra; Thompson v. State, 486 S.W.2d 343 (Tex.Cr.App.); Howard v. State, 484 S.W.2d 903 (Tex.Cr.App.).

1981Broussard, supra; Thompson v. State, 486 S.W.2d 343 (Tex.Cr.App.); Howard v. State, 484 S.W.2d 903 (Tex.Cr.App.).

11981–1981

Where else courts name it

WA 21 (1953–2025) PA 14 (1974–2019) MN 13 (1950–2016) DC 13 (1986–2024) MI 12 (1968–2026) GA 11 (1972–2020) MA 10 (1974–2018) AL 9 (1936–1999) CA 6 (1935–1986) TX 6 (1981–2015) OH 5 (2007–2015) NY 5 (1977–2024) WY 5 (1983–2015) MD 5 (1971–2016) ME 4 (1974–2026) CT 4 (1974–2006) OR 4 (1914–2023) NJ 3 (1955–2017) FL 3 (1977–1995) TN 3 (2019–2026) NC 3 (1996–2000) MS 3 (1997–2003) SC 2 (1993–1993) MO 2 (2015–2015) UT 2 (1948–2026) AZ 2 (1967–1974) ID 2 (2012–2021) VT 2 (2012–2025)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check