Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1991–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hale v. Penagreen2 sentences2005See id. at 946 . 2005See id. at 946. | 2 | 2 |
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Rodriguezgreen1 sentence2023Cf. Rodriguez, 88 S.W.3d at 323-27 (upholding trial court’s striking of defense expert’s testimony where expert testified at trial based on facts not previously disclosed to plaintiffs and used a PowerPoint presentation that had not been shown to plaintiffs despite 23 Dr. Reed explained the basis of her expert opinion at the hearing on Hale’s motion. | 1 | 1 |
Webb v. Glenbrook Owners Ass'n, Inc.green1 sentence2023“Trial by consent does not occur where the complaining party properly objects to the submission of issues not raised by the pleadings.” Webb v. Glenbrook –16– Owners Ass’n, Inc., 298 S.W.3d 374, 380 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2009, no pet.). | 1 | 1 |
Ford Motor Co. v. Ridgwaygreen2 sentences2014Although we would normally address Hale’s challenges to BOA’s no-evidence motion for summary judgment first, see Ford Motor Co. v. Ridgway, 135 S.W.3d 598, 600 (Tex. 2004), we need only address Hale’s challenge to BOA’s traditional motion because its resolution is dispositive of the entire appeal. 2014Although we would normally address Hale’s challenges to BOA’s no-evidence motion for summary judgment first, see Ford Motor Co. v. Ridgway, 135 S.W.3d 598, 600 (Tex. 2004), we need only address Hale’s challenge to BOA’s traditional motion because its resolution is dispositive of the entire appeal. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Dallas County Flood Control District v. Benson
green
2 sentences1991The District asserts that Dallas County Flood Control Dist. v. Benson, 157 Tex. 617 , 306 S.W.2d 350 (1957), is controlling. 1991The District asserts that Dallas County Flood Control Dist. v. Benson, 157 Tex. 617 , 306 S.W.2d 350 (1957), is controlling. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.