implication doctrine (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

implication doctrine in Texas

6 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1952–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
Tyler Scoresby, M.D. v. Catarino Santillan, Individually and as Next Friend of Samuel Santillan, a Minor green
tex · 2011
2 sentences

2012Scoresby , 346 S.W.3d at 557 .

2012Scoresby, 346 S.W.3d at 557 .

32012–2012
KAPPMEYER v. State green
texapp · 2003
1 sentence

2020Id. at 182 .

12020–2020
Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Rigsby green
scotus · 1916
2 sentences

1982It originated in England in 1854 and was first employed by the United States Supreme Court in 1916 in Texas & Pacific Railway v. Rigsby, 241 U.S. 33 , 36 S.Ct. 482 , 60 L.Ed. 874 (1916).

1982It originated in England in 1854 and was first employed by the United States Supreme Court in 1916 in Texas & Pacific Railway v. Rigsby, 241 U.S. 33 , 36 S.Ct. 482 , 60 L.Ed. 874 (1916).

11982–1982
National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. National Assn. of Railroad Passengers green
scotus · 1974
1 sentence

1982Even if we were inclined to entertain the Legislature’s intent behind the passage of the DTPA, we would under the implication doctrine conclude that “the right to recover the damages from the party in default is implied.” Rigsby, id.

11982–1982
Macias v. Macias neutral
texapp · 1941
2 sentences

1952As stated in 42 Tex.Jur., p. 638, quoted with approval in Macias v. Macias, Tex.Civ.App., 148 S.W.2d 240, 242 , "While a court of law looks only to legal ownership according to the deeds evidencing title from the common source, equity keeps its eye on the consideration that passed and protects the party who furnished it.

1952As stated in 42 Tex.Jur., p. 638, quoted with approval in Macias v. Macias, Tex.Civ.App., 148 S.W.2d 240, 242 , “While a court of law looks only to legal •ownership according to the deeds evidencing title from the common source, equity keeps its eye on the consideration that passed and protects the party who furnished it.

11952–1952

Where else courts name it

NY 8 (1862–2022) CA 8 (1932–2025) TX 6 (1952–2020) IL 6 (1929–2012) MO 5 (1958–2005) MD 5 (1958–2013) MA 5 (1933–2012) MI 5 (1953–1991) AR 5 (1917–2011) WY 5 (1974–2017) PA 4 (1838–2016) OR 4 (1905–2009) SC 4 (1922–1992) NC 4 (1904–2012) MS 4 (1994–1999) IA 4 (1970–2024) KS 3 (1911–1929) UT 3 (1934–2021) AL 3 (1921–2006) NE 3 (2015–2019) GA 3 (1926–2003) KY 2 (1968–2023) HI 2 (2007–2025) NH 2 (1987–2002) FL 2 (1958–1989) WI 2 (1906–1977) CO 2 (1955–2013) VT 2 (1987–1994) ID 2 (1934–1976)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check