Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 2009–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson Cityred2 sentences2020Reg’l Planning Comm’n v. Hamilton Bank, 473 U.S. 172, 195 (1985) (“[I]f a State provides an adequate procedure for seeking just compensation, the property owner cannot claim a violation of the Just Compensation Clause until it has used the procedure and been denied just compensation.”); City of Houston v. Guthrie, 332 S.W.3d 578, 592 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2009, pet. denied) (“[A] federal takings claim is not technically ripe until the state takings claim is resolved.”); see also Urban Developers LLC v. City of Jackson, Miss., 468 F.3d 281, 294 (5th Cir. 2006); City of Dallas v. VSC, L 2010City of Dallas v. VRC L.L.C., 260 S.W.3d 60, 66 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2008, no pet.); Williamson County Reg’l Planning Comm’n v. Hamilton Bank, 473 U.S. 172, 195 , 105 S.Ct. 3108, 3121 , 87 L.Ed.2d 126 (1985) (“[I]f a State provides an adequate procedure for seeking just compensation, the property owner cannot claim a violation of the Just Compensation Clause until it has used the procedure and been denied just compensation”). | 3 | 3 |
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Loutzenhiserred2 sentences2010City of Dallas v. VRC L.L.C., 260 S.W.3d 60, 66 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2008, no pet.); Williamson County Reg’l Planning Comm’n v. Hamilton Bank, 473 U.S. 172, 195 , 105 S.Ct. 3108, 3121 , 87 L.Ed.2d 126 (1985) (“[I]f a State provides an adequate procedure for seeking just compensation, the property owner cannot claim a violation of the Just Compensation Clause until it has used the procedure and been denied just compensation”). 2009City of Dallas v. VRC L.L.C., 260 S.W.3d 60, 66 (Tex. App.--Dallas 2008, no pet.); Williamson County Reg'l Planning Comm'n v. Hamilton Bank , 473 U.S. 172, 195 , 105 S.Ct. 3108, 3121 (1985) ("[I]f a State provides an adequate procedure for seeking just compensation, the property owner cannot claim a violation of the Just Compensation Clause until it has used the procedure and been denied just compensation"). | 2 | 2 |
City of Dallas v. VRC LLCgreen2 sentences2010City of Dallas v. VRC L.L.C., 260 S.W.3d 60, 66 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2008, no pet.); Williamson County Reg’l Planning Comm’n v. Hamilton Bank, 473 U.S. 172, 195 , 105 S.Ct. 3108, 3121 , 87 L.Ed.2d 126 (1985) (“[I]f a State provides an adequate procedure for seeking just compensation, the property owner cannot claim a violation of the Just Compensation Clause until it has used the procedure and been denied just compensation”). 2009City of Dallas v. VRC L.L.C., 260 S.W.3d 60, 66 (Tex. App.--Dallas 2008, no pet.); Williamson County Reg'l Planning Comm'n v. Hamilton Bank , 473 U.S. 172, 195 , 105 S.Ct. 3108, 3121 (1985) ("[I]f a State provides an adequate procedure for seeking just compensation, the property owner cannot claim a violation of the Just Compensation Clause until it has used the procedure and been denied just compensation"). | 2 | 2 |
City of Dallas v. VSC, LLCgreen1 sentence2020Reg’l Planning Comm’n v. Hamilton Bank, 473 U.S. 172, 195 (1985) (“[I]f a State provides an adequate procedure for seeking just compensation, the property owner cannot claim a violation of the Just Compensation Clause until it has used the procedure and been denied just compensation.”); City of Houston v. Guthrie, 332 S.W.3d 578, 592 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2009, pet. denied) (“[A] federal takings claim is not technically ripe until the state takings claim is resolved.”); see also Urban Developers LLC v. City of Jackson, Miss., 468 F.3d 281, 294 (5th Cir. 2006); City of Dallas v. VSC, L | 1 | 1 |
Urban Developers LLC v. City of Jackson MSgreen1 sentence2020Reg’l Planning Comm’n v. Hamilton Bank, 473 U.S. 172, 195 (1985) (“[I]f a State provides an adequate procedure for seeking just compensation, the property owner cannot claim a violation of the Just Compensation Clause until it has used the procedure and been denied just compensation.”); City of Houston v. Guthrie, 332 S.W.3d 578, 592 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2009, pet. denied) (“[A] federal takings claim is not technically ripe until the state takings claim is resolved.”); see also Urban Developers LLC v. City of Jackson, Miss., 468 F.3d 281, 294 (5th Cir. 2006); City of Dallas v. VSC, L | 1 | 1 |
City of Houston v. Guthriegreen1 sentence2020Reg’l Planning Comm’n v. Hamilton Bank, 473 U.S. 172, 195 (1985) (“[I]f a State provides an adequate procedure for seeking just compensation, the property owner cannot claim a violation of the Just Compensation Clause until it has used the procedure and been denied just compensation.”); City of Houston v. Guthrie, 332 S.W.3d 578, 592 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2009, pet. denied) (“[A] federal takings claim is not technically ripe until the state takings claim is resolved.”); see also Urban Developers LLC v. City of Jackson, Miss., 468 F.3d 281, 294 (5th Cir. 2006); City of Dallas v. VSC, L | 1 | 1 |
City of New Braunfels, Texas v. Carowest Land, Ltd.green1 sentence2019See City of New Braunfels v. Carowest Land, Ltd., 432 S.W.3d 501, 517-18 (Tex. App.—Austin 2014, no pet.). | 1 | 1 |
Hearts Bluff Game Ranch, Inc. v. Stategreen1 sentence2015To the extent the City presents this as a bright-line rule, it is mistaken. 3 As recently recognized by our Supreme Court, in at least some circumstances courts may “consider the federal and state takings claims together, as the analysis for both is complementary.” Hearts Bluff, 381 S.W.3d 468, 477 (citing City of Austin v. Travis Cnty. | 1 | 1 |
Town of Flower Mound v. Stafford Estates Ltd. Partnershipgreen2 sentences2011P’ship, 135 S.W.3d 620, 646 (Tex.2004). 2011P'ship, 135 S.W.3d 620, 646 (Tex.2004). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.