Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Wisconsin opinions name it 2 courts 1894–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wisconsin courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wisconsin. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wisconsin. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Knight
green
2 sentences2020The appellate court is therefore "a more appropriate and better suited forum than is the circuit court to determine whether appellate counsel's performance was deficient and prejudiced the defendant's appeal." Id. ¶19 The court of appeals added an additional piece to the Knight framework in State ex rel. 2020The appellate court is therefore "a more appropriate and better suited forum than is the circuit court to determine whether appellate counsel's performance was deficient and prejudiced the defendant's appeal." Id. ¶19 The court of appeals added an additional piece to the Knight framework in State ex rel. | 3 | 1995–2020 |
State Ex Rel. Rothering v. Mc Caughtry
green
2 sentences2020Rothering v. McCaughtry, 205 Wis. 2d 675 , 556 N.W.2d 136 (Ct. App. 1996) (per curiam). 2020Rothering v. McCaughtry, 205 Wis. 2d 675 , 556 N.W.2d 136 (Ct. App. 1996) (per curiam). | 2 | 2020–2020 |
State v. MacHner
green
2 sentences2023Regarding Knight’s claim that trial 2 During the hearing on its postconviction motion, defense counsel withdrew its objection to trial counsel’s failure to call Gardner as a defense witness. 3 See State v. Machner, 101 Wis. 2d 79 , 303 N.W.2d 633 (1981). 4 counsel was deficient for failing to obtain additional jail records to prove that Sparks was lying, the court found the witness testimony to be “credible” and “detailed” on this topic. 2023Regarding Knight’s claim that trial 2 During the hearing on its postconviction motion, defense counsel withdrew its objection to trial counsel’s failure to call Gardner as a defense witness. 3 See State v. Machner, 101 Wis. 2d 79 , 303 N.W.2d 633 (1981). 4 counsel was deficient for failing to obtain additional jail records to prove that Sparks was lying, the court found the witness testimony to be “credible” and “detailed” on this topic. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
State v. Poellinger
green
2 sentences2018State v. Poellinger , 153 Wis. 2d 493 , 506, 451 N.W.2d 752 (1990). ¶ 14 In addition, Knight's motion does not persuade us of his apparent view that a victim's encounter with a defendant during pre-trial proceedings creates impermissible suggestiveness or compromises the legality of the victim's at-trial identification. ¶ 15 Knight's WIS. 2018State v. Poellinger , 153 Wis. 2d 493 , 506, 451 N.W.2d 752 (1990). ¶ 14 In addition, Knight's motion does not persuade us of his apparent view that a victim's encounter with a defendant during pre-trial proceedings creates impermissible suggestiveness or compromises the legality of the victim's at-trial identification. ¶ 15 Knight's WIS. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Supervisors of La Pointe v. O'Malley
green
1 sentence1894The case of La Povnte v. O’Malley, 46 Wis. 35 , effectually disposes of Knight’s claim to hold by color of right or de faeto. | 1 | 1894–1894 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.