essential and fundamental requirement (Alabama) · Go Syfert
← Alabama issues

essential and fundamental requirement in Alabama

5 Alabama opinions name it 1 courts 1978–1993 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Anderson v. Stategreen
alacrimapp · 1978 · cited in 4 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 1989–1993
2 sentences

1993“The accused has a constitutional right of confrontation and cross-examination which is an essential and fundamental requirement of a fair trial.” Anderson v. State, 362 So.2d 1296, 1301 (Ala.Crim.App.1978).

1991As this court stated in Anderson v. State, 362 So.2d 1296 (Ala.Cr.App.1978): “The accused has a constitutional right of confrontation and cross-examination which is an essential and fundamental requirement of a fair trial.” Anderson, 362 So.2d at 1301 , citing Pointer v. Texas, 380 U.S. 400 , 85 S.Ct. 1065 , 13 L.Ed.2d 923 (1965); Douglas v. Alabama, 380 U.S. 415 , 85 S.Ct. 1074 , 13 L.Ed.2d 934 (1965); Mattox v. United States, 156 U.S. 237 , 15 S.Ct. 337 , 39 L.Ed. 409 (1895).

14
Barber v. Pagered
scotus · 1968 · cited in 1 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 1989–1989
2 sentences

1989See also Barber v. Page , 390 U.S. 719 , 88 S.Ct. 1318 , 20 L.Ed.2d 255 (1968); Pointer v. Texas , 380 U.S. 400 , 85 S.Ct. 1065 , 13 L.Ed.2d 923 (1965); Douglas v. Alabama , 380 U.S. 415 , 85 S.Ct. 1074 , 13 L.Ed.2d 934 (1965).

1989See also Barber v. Page , 390 U.S. 719 , 88 S.Ct. 1318 , 20 L.Ed.2d 255 (1968); Pointer v. Texas , 380 U.S. 400 , 85 S.Ct. 1065 , 13 L.Ed.2d 923 (1965); Douglas v. Alabama , 380 U.S. 415 , 85 S.Ct. 1074 , 13 L.Ed.2d 934 (1965).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Douglas v. Alabama green
scotus · 1965
2 sentences

1991As this court stated in Anderson v. State, 362 So.2d 1296 (Ala.Cr.App.1978): “The accused has a constitutional right of confrontation and cross-examination which is an essential and fundamental requirement of a fair trial.” Anderson, 362 So.2d at 1301 , citing Pointer v. Texas, 380 U.S. 400 , 85 S.Ct. 1065 , 13 L.Ed.2d 923 (1965); Douglas v. Alabama, 380 U.S. 415 , 85 S.Ct. 1074 , 13 L.Ed.2d 934 (1965); Mattox v. United States, 156 U.S. 237 , 15 S.Ct. 337 , 39 L.Ed. 409 (1895).

1991As this court stated in Anderson v. State, 362 So.2d 1296 (Ala.Cr.App.1978): “The accused has a constitutional right of confrontation and cross-examination which is an essential and fundamental requirement of a fair trial.” Anderson, 362 So.2d at 1301 , citing Pointer v. Texas, 380 U.S. 400 , 85 S.Ct. 1065 , 13 L.Ed.2d 923 (1965); Douglas v. Alabama, 380 U.S. 415 , 85 S.Ct. 1074 , 13 L.Ed.2d 934 (1965); Mattox v. United States, 156 U.S. 237 , 15 S.Ct. 337 , 39 L.Ed. 409 (1895).

41978–1991
Pointer v. Texas green
scotus · 1965
2 sentences

1991As this court stated in Anderson v. State, 362 So.2d 1296 (Ala.Cr.App.1978): “The accused has a constitutional right of confrontation and cross-examination which is an essential and fundamental requirement of a fair trial.” Anderson, 362 So.2d at 1301 , citing Pointer v. Texas, 380 U.S. 400 , 85 S.Ct. 1065 , 13 L.Ed.2d 923 (1965); Douglas v. Alabama, 380 U.S. 415 , 85 S.Ct. 1074 , 13 L.Ed.2d 934 (1965); Mattox v. United States, 156 U.S. 237 , 15 S.Ct. 337 , 39 L.Ed. 409 (1895).

1991As this court stated in Anderson v. State, 362 So.2d 1296 (Ala.Cr.App.1978): “The accused has a constitutional right of confrontation and cross-examination which is an essential and fundamental requirement of a fair trial.” Anderson, 362 So.2d at 1301 , citing Pointer v. Texas, 380 U.S. 400 , 85 S.Ct. 1065 , 13 L.Ed.2d 923 (1965); Douglas v. Alabama, 380 U.S. 415 , 85 S.Ct. 1074 , 13 L.Ed.2d 934 (1965); Mattox v. United States, 156 U.S. 237 , 15 S.Ct. 337 , 39 L.Ed. 409 (1895).

41978–1991
Mattox v. United States green
scotus · 1895
2 sentences

1991As this court stated in Anderson v. State, 362 So.2d 1296 (Ala.Cr.App.1978): “The accused has a constitutional right of confrontation and cross-examination which is an essential and fundamental requirement of a fair trial.” Anderson, 362 So.2d at 1301 , citing Pointer v. Texas, 380 U.S. 400 , 85 S.Ct. 1065 , 13 L.Ed.2d 923 (1965); Douglas v. Alabama, 380 U.S. 415 , 85 S.Ct. 1074 , 13 L.Ed.2d 934 (1965); Mattox v. United States, 156 U.S. 237 , 15 S.Ct. 337 , 39 L.Ed. 409 (1895).

1991As this court stated in Anderson v. State, 362 So.2d 1296 (Ala.Cr.App.1978): “The accused has a constitutional right of confrontation and cross-examination which is an essential and fundamental requirement of a fair trial.” Anderson, 362 So.2d at 1301 , citing Pointer v. Texas, 380 U.S. 400 , 85 S.Ct. 1065 , 13 L.Ed.2d 923 (1965); Douglas v. Alabama, 380 U.S. 415 , 85 S.Ct. 1074 , 13 L.Ed.2d 934 (1965); Mattox v. United States, 156 U.S. 237 , 15 S.Ct. 337 , 39 L.Ed. 409 (1895).

31978–1991

Where else courts name it

CA 24 (1968–2021) MA 12 (1975–2010) TX 11 (1968–2018) MI 11 (1977–2024) MS 10 (1992–2019) MO 8 (1906–2003) WA 7 (1975–2017) LA 6 (1973–1982) WI 6 (1982–2017) IL 6 (1980–2023) NE 6 (1982–2016) NJ 5 (1980–2023) WV 5 (1995–2016) MD 5 (1972–2011) AL 5 (1978–1993) OH 4 (1967–2005) NC 4 (2003–2022) NY 4 (1983–2004) RI 3 (1981–1995) ID 3 (1981–1988) CO 3 (1990–2001) PA 3 (1968–2006) TN 2 (1978–2002) MT 2 (1997–2006) VA 2 (2005–2006) ND 2 (1974–2001) FL 2 (1980–1999) DC 2 (1999–2002) UT 2 (1985–2006) NM 2 (1975–2006) VT 2 (1986–1990) OR 2 (1892–1914)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check