Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Alabama opinions name it 1 courts 1977–1999 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Miranda v. Arizonagreen2 sentences1999Without the right to cut off questioning, the setting of in-custody interrogation operates on the individual to overcome free choice in producing a statement after the privilege has been once invoked.' [ Miranda v. Arizona , ] 384 U.S., [436] at 473-74, 86 S.Ct., [1602] at 1627[, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966)]. 1990Without the right to cut off questioning, the setting of in-custody interrogation operates on the individual to overcome free choice in producing a statement after the privilege has been once invoked.' 384 U.S., at 473-474 [ 86 S.Ct., at 1627 -1628 ]. | 1 | 2 |
United States v. Finnie Duarant Hinesgreen1 sentence1980The statements in United States v. Hines, 605 F.2d 132, 134 (4th Cir. 1979), are applicable to this case. | 1 | 1 |
Sullivan v. Stategreen1 sentence1980“An inference of a waiver may be drawn from the making of a statement after warnings have been given and when the defendant was aware of his right not to speak.” Sullivan v. State, 351 So.2d 659, 664 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, Ex parte Sullivan, 351 So.2d 665 (Ala.1977). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
James O. Mitchell v. United States
green
2 sentences1981Mitchell v. United States , 140 U.S.App.D.C. 209 , 434 F.2d 483 , cert. denied, 400 U.S. 867 , 91 S.Ct. 109 , 27 L.Ed.2d 106 (1970)." 351 So.2d, at 664. 1977Mitchell v. United States , 140 U.S.App.D.C. 209 , 434 F.2d 483 , cert. denied, 400 U.S. 867 , 91 S.Ct. 109 , 27 L.Ed.2d 106 (1970). | 2 | 1977–1981 |
Hines v. New Jersey
green
2 sentences1981Mitchell v. United States , 140 U.S.App.D.C. 209 , 434 F.2d 483 , cert. denied, 400 U.S. 867 , 91 S.Ct. 109 , 27 L.Ed.2d 106 (1970)." 351 So.2d, at 664. 1977Mitchell v. United States , 140 U.S.App.D.C. 209 , 434 F.2d 483 , cert. denied, 400 U.S. 867 , 91 S.Ct. 109 , 27 L.Ed.2d 106 (1970). | 2 | 1977–1981 |
Cleveland v. New Jersey
green
2 sentences1981Mitchell v. United States , 140 U.S.App.D.C. 209 , 434 F.2d 483 , cert. denied, 400 U.S. 867 , 91 S.Ct. 109 , 27 L.Ed.2d 106 (1970)." 351 So.2d, at 664. 1977Mitchell v. United States , 140 U.S.App.D.C. 209 , 434 F.2d 483 , cert. denied, 400 U.S. 867 , 91 S.Ct. 109 , 27 L.Ed.2d 106 (1970). | 2 | 1977–1981 |
Ex Parte Sullivan
green
1 sentence1980“An inference of a waiver may be drawn from the making of a statement after warnings have been given and when the defendant was aware of his right not to speak.” Sullivan v. State, 351 So.2d 659, 664 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, Ex parte Sullivan, 351 So.2d 665 (Ala.1977). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.