Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2009 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Smith v. Stategreen2 sentences2001See, e.g., Smith v. State, 316 Ark. 32 , 870 S.W.2d 716 (1994); Ottens v. State, 316 Ark. 1 , 871 S.W.2d 329 (1994); Allred v. State, 310 Ark. 476 , 837 S.W.2d 469 (1992). 2001See, e.g., Smith v. State, 316 Ark. 32 , 870 S.W.2d 716 (1994); Ottens v. State, 316 Ark. 1 , 871 S.W.2d 329 (1994); Allred v. State, 310 Ark. 476 , 837 S.W.2d 469 (1992). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Dawson
green
2 sentences2009State v. Dawson, 343 Ark. 683 , 38 S.W.3d 319 (2001). 2009State v. Dawson, 343 Ark. 683 , 38 S.W.3d 319 (2001). | 2 | 2006–2009 |
Ottens v. State
green
2 sentences2009Ottens v. State, 316 Ark. 1 , 871 S.W.2d 329 (1994). 2 The thirty-day requirement for filing an appeal under Rule 9 is mandatory and jurisdictional, and | ¡¡the circuit court has no authority to accept untimely appeals. 2009Ottens v. State, 316 Ark. 1 , 871 S.W.2d 329 (1994). 2 The thirty-day requirement for filing an appeal under Rule 9 is mandatory and jurisdictional, and | ¡¡the circuit court has no authority to accept untimely appeals. | 2 | 2001–2009 |
Edwards v. City of Conway
green
2 sentences2001Lineberry v. State, 322 Ark. 84 , 907 S.W.2d 705 (1995); Bocksnick v. City of London, 308 Ark. 599 , 825 S.W.2d 267 (1992); Edwards v. City of Conway, 300 Ark. 135 , 777 S.W.2d 583 (1989). 2001Lineberry v. State, 322 Ark. 84 , 907 S.W.2d 705 (1995); Bocksnick v. City of London, 308 Ark. 599 , 825 S.W.2d 267 (1992); Edwards v. City of Conway, 300 Ark. 135 , 777 S.W.2d 583 (1989). | 2 | 1994–2001 |
Lineberry v. State
neutral
2 sentences2001Lineberry v. State, 322 Ark. 84 , 907 S.W.2d 705 (1995); Bocksnick v. City of London, 308 Ark. 599 , 825 S.W.2d 267 (1992); Edwards v. City of Conway, 300 Ark. 135 , 777 S.W.2d 583 (1989). 2001Lineberry v. State, 322 Ark. 84 , 907 S.W.2d 705 (1995); Bocksnick v. City of London, 308 Ark. 599 , 825 S.W.2d 267 (1992); Edwards v. City of Conway, 300 Ark. 135 , 777 S.W.2d 583 (1989). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Bocksnick v. City of London
green
2 sentences2001Lineberry v. State, 322 Ark. 84 , 907 S.W.2d 705 (1995); Bocksnick v. City of London, 308 Ark. 599 , 825 S.W.2d 267 (1992); Edwards v. City of Conway, 300 Ark. 135 , 777 S.W.2d 583 (1989). 2001Lineberry v. State, 322 Ark. 84 , 907 S.W.2d 705 (1995); Bocksnick v. City of London, 308 Ark. 599 , 825 S.W.2d 267 (1992); Edwards v. City of Conway, 300 Ark. 135 , 777 S.W.2d 583 (1989). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Allred v. State
green
2 sentences2001See, e.g., Smith v. State, 316 Ark. 32 , 870 S.W.2d 716 (1994); Ottens v. State, 316 Ark. 1 , 871 S.W.2d 329 (1994); Allred v. State, 310 Ark. 476 , 837 S.W.2d 469 (1992). 2001See, e.g., Smith v. State, 316 Ark. 32 , 870 S.W.2d 716 (1994); Ottens v. State, 316 Ark. 1 , 871 S.W.2d 329 (1994); Allred v. State, 310 Ark. 476 , 837 S.W.2d 469 (1992). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.