Account information only. It is never shown to the AI client you connect, and it is kept apart from your research — which is not logged at all.
Your token is the key to the MCP: claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode take it in the URL; Claude Code and the rest take it as a bearer header. It is also in your welcome email. Install instructions.
No token yet. One token per address, shown once and mailed to you with setup steps — claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode need it in the URL; Claude Code and the rest take it as a bearer header. Install instructions.
Your MCP token. Anyone holding it can search on your subscription, so keep it off shared screens.
Header form (recommended) — this endpoint, with
Authorization: Bearer <your token>.
URL form — for claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode, which cannot set a header. The whole credential is in the address:
The dedicated fast index: searches run on a machine nobody else queues for, with full-text highlighted excerpts. Higher MCP limits, and semantic search when it lands.
See ProThank you.
Manage billingDelete my account: email [email protected] and it is done by hand, usually the same day. (Self-serve deletion is not built yet.)
Free, and it takes a minute. Registered visitors skip the Cloudflare checks, and your MCP token for Claude or ChatGPT is issued at the end of this.
Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
Here is your MCP token. It is shown once — it is also in the welcome email we just sent you, with setup steps.
Header form (recommended) — this endpoint, with
Authorization: Bearer <your token>.
URL form — for claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode, which cannot set a header. The whole credential is in the address:
That address already had a token, so we did not issue a second one — two live credentials for one mailbox is how people end up with a working laptop and a broken office machine. Your connector URL is in your inbox under “Your Syfert legal research connector URL”; if it is gone, call 904-383-7448.
5 Arizona opinions name it 1 courts 1992–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Kronegreen1 sentence2025See Krone, 182 Ariz. at 323 (“A defendant should not have a lesser included instruction forced upon him.”). | 1 | 1 |
Boatman v. Samaritan Health Services, Inc.green1 sentence2021See A.R.S. § 12-541(1); see also Boatman v. Samaritan Health Servs., 168 Ariz. 207 , 212–13 (App. 1990). ¶4 Peterson filed a Response to the Motion to Dismiss and Alternative Motion for Leave to Amend, attaching a declaration (the “Declaration”), which stated that Burke made additional defamatory statements in May 2019 that led to the filing of the FAC. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Fimbresgreen2 sentences2011See State v. Fimbres, 152 Ariz. 440, 441-42 , 733 P.2d 637, 638-39 (App.1986). 2011See State v. Fimbres, 152 Ariz. 440, 441-42 , 733 P.2d 637, 638-39 (App.1986). | 1 | 1 |
David Davidian Audrey R. Davidian v. Southern California Meat Cutters Union and Food Employees Benefit Fundgreen1 sentence1994See Davidian v. Southern California Meat Gutters Union, 859 F.2d 134 (9th Cir.1988); Hansen v. Western Greyhound Retirement Plan, 859 F.2d 779 (9th Cir.1988). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Williamsgreen2 sentences1992State v. Williams, 144 Ariz. 433, 441 , 698 P.2d 678, 686 (1985). 1992State v. Williams, 144 Ariz. 433, 441 , 698 P.2d 678, 686 (1985). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Leroy Ellenburg, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee. v. Brockway, Inc. & Spellman Cunningham, Defendants-Appellees/cross-Appellants
green
1 sentence1994LAW OF THE CASE After trial, the trust fund filed a “Post-Trial Memorandum, Request for Judgment,” arguing, for the first time, that “recent dis-positive authority from the Ninth Circuit requires that Peterson’s claim for estoppel be denied as a matter of law.” The trust fund noted that, although the court of appeals had previously held that this estoppel claim was permitted under Ellenburg v. Brockway, 763 F.2d 1091 (9th Cir.1985), more recent ninth circuit case law specifically precluded estoppel claims against jointly administered ERISA trust funds as a matter of federal law. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Gordon Hansen v. Western Greyhound Retirement Plan and Western Greyhound Pension Trust
green
1 sentence1994See Davidian v. Southern California Meat Gutters Union, 859 F.2d 134 (9th Cir.1988); Hansen v. Western Greyhound Retirement Plan, 859 F.2d 779 (9th Cir.1988). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.