Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 California opinions name it 2 courts 1996–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Colorado v. Connellygreen2 sentences1998(See Colorado v. Connelly, supra, 479 U.S. at p. 164 [ 107 S.Ct. at p. 520 ] [“Absent police conduct causally related to the confession, there is simply no basis for concluding that any state actor has deprived a criminal defendant of due process of law.” (Fn. omitted.)]; Fare, supra, 442 U.S. at pp. 726-727 [99 S.Ct. at pp. 2572-2573]; Moran, supra, 475 U.S. at pp. 421-422 [106 S.Ct. at pp. 1140-1141].) We next turn to the second component of the analysis, which focuses on whether defendant was aware of the rights he was abandoning and of the consequences of his decision to do so. 1998(See Colorado v. Connelly, supra, 479 U.S. at p. 164 [ 107 S.Ct. at p. 520 ] [“Absent police conduct causally related to the confession, there is simply no basis for concluding that any state actor has deprived a criminal defendant of due process of law.” (Fn. omitted.)]; Fare, supra, 442 U.S. at pp. 726-727 [99 S.Ct. at pp. 2572-2573]; Moran, supra, 475 U.S. at pp. 421-422 [106 S.Ct. at pp. 1140-1141].) We next turn to the second component of the analysis, which focuses on whether defendant was aware of the rights he was abandoning and of the consequences of his decision to do so. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Cooper
green
1 sentence2015(See People v. Cooper (1970) 10 Cal.App.3d 96, 108 .) We next turn to the second component of the analysis, focusing on whether appellant was aware of the rights she was abandoning and the consequences of that decision. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
People v. Whitson
green
1 sentence2015(Whitson, supra, 17 Cal.4th at p. 250 .) Yee informed appellant he was a 18. detective with the Fresno Police Department and he was investigating the shooting. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Christina N.
green
1 sentence2013(In re Dakota H. (2005) 132 Cal.App.4th 212, 229 ) “In order to overcome the statutory preference for adoption, the parent must prove he or she occupies a parental role in the child’s life, resulting in a significant, positive emotional attachment of the child to the parent. [Citations.]” (Ibid.) Put another way, “if severing the existing parental relationship would deprive the child of ‘a substantial, positive emotional attachment such that the child would be greatly harmed, the preference for adoption is overcome and the natural parent’s rights are not terminated.’ [Citation.] In other words | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Ventura County Human Services Agency v. Frank B.
yellow
1 sentence2013There is a second component to this exception to the adoption preference—the child would benefit from continuing the relationship. “‘To trigger the application of the parental relationship exception, the parent must show the parent-child relationship is sufficiently strong that the child would suffer detriment from its termination.’ [Citation.] A beneficial relationship ‘is one that “promotes the well-being of the child to such a degree as to outweigh the well-being the child would gain in a permanent home with new, adoptive parents.” [Citation.] The existence of this relationship is determine | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Barnes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
green
1 sentence1996It was, of course, the second component of the rule which we applied to mutual insurers in Barnes, supra, 16 Cal.App.4th 365, 378-379 , and which we here apply to reciprocals. d. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.