Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Connecticut opinions name it 2 courts 1950–2002 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Boykins Narrow Fabrics Corp. v. Weldon Roofing & Sheet Metal, Inc.green2 sentences1983Compare Boykins Narrow Fabrics Corporation v. Weldon Roofing & Sheet Metal, Inc., 221 Va. 81, 84-85 , 266 S.E.2d 887 (1980) (repairs by roofer do not toll statute absent basis for estoppel or fraud); Mason v. County of Mobile, 410 So. 2d 19, 21 (Ala. 1982) (repairs to damaged pipe toll statute where there is reliance by the consumer); and Carlson v. Ray Geophysical Division, 156 Mont. 450, 452-53 , 481 P.2d 327 (1971) (repairs without proof of fraudulent concealment do not toll statute); with Little Rock School District v. Celotex Corporation, 264 Ark. 757, 767 , 574 S.W.2d 669 (1978) (whether 1983Compare Boykins Narrow Fabrics Corporation v. Weldon Roofing & Sheet Metal, Inc., 221 Va. 81, 84-85 , 266 S.E.2d 887 (1980) (repairs by roofer do not toll statute absent basis for estoppel or fraud); Mason v. County of Mobile, 410 So. 2d 19, 21 (Ala. 1982) (repairs to damaged pipe toll statute where there is reliance by the consumer); and Carlson v. Ray Geophysical Division, 156 Mont. 450, 452-53 , 481 P.2d 327 (1971) (repairs without proof of fraudulent concealment do not toll statute); with Little Rock School District v. Celotex Corporation, 264 Ark. 757, 767 , 574 S.W.2d 669 (1978) (whether | 1 | 1 |
State v. Ouellettegreen2 sentences1983Here, the trial court did not make a determination, as it must; see State v. Ouellette, 190 Conn. 84, 98 , 459 A.2d 1005 (1983); that Murphy’s prior statements were given at a time when her claimed bias did not exist. 1983Here, the trial court did not make a determination, as it must; see State v. Ouellette, 190 Conn. 84, 98 , 459 A.2d 1005 (1983); that Murphy’s prior statements were given at a time when her claimed bias did not exist. | 1 | 1 |
Mason v. County of Mobilegreen1 sentence1983Compare Boykins Narrow Fabrics Corporation v. Weldon Roofing & Sheet Metal, Inc., 221 Va. 81, 84-85 , 266 S.E.2d 887 (1980) (repairs by roofer do not toll statute absent basis for estoppel or fraud); Mason v. County of Mobile, 410 So. 2d 19, 21 (Ala. 1982) (repairs to damaged pipe toll statute where there is reliance by the consumer); and Carlson v. Ray Geophysical Division, 156 Mont. 450, 452-53 , 481 P.2d 327 (1971) (repairs without proof of fraudulent concealment do not toll statute); with Little Rock School District v. Celotex Corporation, 264 Ark. 757, 767 , 574 S.W.2d 669 (1978) (whether | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Barrett v. Danbury Hospital
green
2 sentences2002The Supreme Court in Barrett v. Danbury Hospital , 232 Conn. 242 , 654 A.2d 748 (1995) held that in order for Montinieri to apply, the plaintiff himself must be in danger or at risk. 2002The Supreme Court in Barrett v. Danbury Hospital , 232 Conn. 242 , 654 A.2d 748 (1995) held that in order for Montinieri to apply, the plaintiff himself must be in danger or at risk. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
State v. Clark
green
2 sentences1993We, as a reviewing court, “cannot find facts, nor, in the first instance, draw conclusions of facts from primary facts found, but can only review such findings to see whether they might legally, logically and reasonably be found.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Clark, 160 Conn. 555, 556 , 274 A.2d 451 (1970). 1993We, as a reviewing court, “cannot find facts, nor, in the first instance, draw conclusions of facts from primary facts found, but can only review such findings to see whether they might legally, logically and reasonably be found.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Clark, 160 Conn. 555, 556 , 274 A.2d 451 (1970). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Little Rock School District v. Celotex Corp.
green
1 sentence1983Compare Boykins Narrow Fabrics Corporation v. Weldon Roofing & Sheet Metal, Inc., 221 Va. 81, 84-85 , 266 S.E.2d 887 (1980) (repairs by roofer do not toll statute absent basis for estoppel or fraud); Mason v. County of Mobile, 410 So. 2d 19, 21 (Ala. 1982) (repairs to damaged pipe toll statute where there is reliance by the consumer); and Carlson v. Ray Geophysical Division, 156 Mont. 450, 452-53 , 481 P.2d 327 (1971) (repairs without proof of fraudulent concealment do not toll statute); with Little Rock School District v. Celotex Corporation, 264 Ark. 757, 767 , 574 S.W.2d 669 (1978) (whether | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Cacace v. Morcaldi
green
2 sentences1983Compare Boykins Narrow Fabrics Corporation v. Weldon Roofing & Sheet Metal, Inc., 221 Va. 81, 84-85 , 266 S.E.2d 887 (1980) (repairs by roofer do not toll statute absent basis for estoppel or fraud); Mason v. County of Mobile, 410 So. 2d 19, 21 (Ala. 1982) (repairs to damaged pipe toll statute where there is reliance by the consumer); and Carlson v. Ray Geophysical Division, 156 Mont. 450, 452-53 , 481 P.2d 327 (1971) (repairs without proof of fraudulent concealment do not toll statute); with Little Rock School District v. Celotex Corporation, 264 Ark. 757, 767 , 574 S.W.2d 669 (1978) (whether 1983Compare Boykins Narrow Fabrics Corporation v. Weldon Roofing & Sheet Metal, Inc., 221 Va. 81, 84-85 , 266 S.E.2d 887 (1980) (repairs by roofer do not toll statute absent basis for estoppel or fraud); Mason v. County of Mobile, 410 So. 2d 19, 21 (Ala. 1982) (repairs to damaged pipe toll statute where there is reliance by the consumer); and Carlson v. Ray Geophysical Division, 156 Mont. 450, 452-53 , 481 P.2d 327 (1971) (repairs without proof of fraudulent concealment do not toll statute); with Little Rock School District v. Celotex Corporation, 264 Ark. 757, 767 , 574 S.W.2d 669 (1978) (whether | 1 | 1983–1983 |
LITTLE ROCK SCH. DIST. OF PULASKI CTY. v. Celotex
green
1 sentence1983Compare Boykins Narrow Fabrics Corporation v. Weldon Roofing & Sheet Metal, Inc., 221 Va. 81, 84-85 , 266 S.E.2d 887 (1980) (repairs by roofer do not toll statute absent basis for estoppel or fraud); Mason v. County of Mobile, 410 So. 2d 19, 21 (Ala. 1982) (repairs to damaged pipe toll statute where there is reliance by the consumer); and Carlson v. Ray Geophysical Division, 156 Mont. 450, 452-53 , 481 P.2d 327 (1971) (repairs without proof of fraudulent concealment do not toll statute); with Little Rock School District v. Celotex Corporation, 264 Ark. 757, 767 , 574 S.W.2d 669 (1978) (whether | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Carlson v. Ray Geophysical Division
green
2 sentences1983Compare Boykins Narrow Fabrics Corporation v. Weldon Roofing & Sheet Metal, Inc., 221 Va. 81, 84-85 , 266 S.E.2d 887 (1980) (repairs by roofer do not toll statute absent basis for estoppel or fraud); Mason v. County of Mobile, 410 So. 2d 19, 21 (Ala. 1982) (repairs to damaged pipe toll statute where there is reliance by the consumer); and Carlson v. Ray Geophysical Division, 156 Mont. 450, 452-53 , 481 P.2d 327 (1971) (repairs without proof of fraudulent concealment do not toll statute); with Little Rock School District v. Celotex Corporation, 264 Ark. 757, 767 , 574 S.W.2d 669 (1978) (whether 1983Compare Boykins Narrow Fabrics Corporation v. Weldon Roofing & Sheet Metal, Inc., 221 Va. 81, 84-85 , 266 S.E.2d 887 (1980) (repairs by roofer do not toll statute absent basis for estoppel or fraud); Mason v. County of Mobile, 410 So. 2d 19, 21 (Ala. 1982) (repairs to damaged pipe toll statute where there is reliance by the consumer); and Carlson v. Ray Geophysical Division, 156 Mont. 450, 452-53 , 481 P.2d 327 (1971) (repairs without proof of fraudulent concealment do not toll statute); with Little Rock School District v. Celotex Corporation, 264 Ark. 757, 767 , 574 S.W.2d 669 (1978) (whether | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Bradshaw v. . Millikin
green
1 sentence1950The discussions in Bradshaw v. Millikin, 173 N.C. 432 , L.R.A. 1917E, 880 , and Reeves v. Sargeant, 200 S.C. 494 , are particularly helpful in gauging the limits of the problem at bar. | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Reeves v. Sargeant
green
1 sentence1950The discussions in Bradshaw v. Millikin, 173 N.C. 432 , L.R.A. 1917E, 880 , and Reeves v. Sargeant, 200 S.C. 494 , are particularly helpful in gauging the limits of the problem at bar. | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.