Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1993–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
George J. Gallon v. The Lloyd-Thomas Company, a Corporationgreen2 sentences1997Gallon v. Lloyd-Thomas Co., 264 F.2d 821, 826 (8th Cir. 1959). 1994This reading comports with the common understanding that intention is “[a]n essential element in the doctrine of ratification . . . .” Gallon v. Lloyd-Thomas Co., 264 F.2d 821, 826 (8th Cir. 1959). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Narumanchi v. DeStefano
green
2 sentences2010“Speculation and conjecture have no place in appellate review.” Narumanchi v. DeStefano, 89 Conn. App. 807, 815 , 875 A.2d 71 (2005). “[Wjhere the trial court’s decision is ambiguous, unclear or incomplete, an appellant must seek an articulation ... or this court will not review the claim.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Testone v. C. 2010“Speculation and conjecture have no place in appellate review.” Narumanchi v. DeStefano, 89 Conn. App. 807, 815 , 875 A.2d 71 (2005). “[Wjhere the trial court’s decision is ambiguous, unclear or incomplete, an appellant must seek an articulation ... or this court will not review the claim.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Testone v. C. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Matulis v. Gans
green
1 sentence1994These acts must be done with the intent to ratify the prior action taken by the agent, see Hartford Accident Indemnity Co. v. South Windsor Bank and Trust Co. , 171 Conn. 63 , 72 (1976), relying on Ansonia v. Cooper , 64 Conn. 536 , 544 and Mataulis v. Gans , 107 Conn. 562 , 566 . | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. South Windsor Bank & Trust Co.
green
1 sentence1994These acts must be done with the intent to ratify the prior action taken by the agent, see Hartford Accident Indemnity Co. v. South Windsor Bank and Trust Co. , 171 Conn. 63 , 72 (1976), relying on Ansonia v. Cooper , 64 Conn. 536 , 544 and Mataulis v. Gans , 107 Conn. 562 , 566 . | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Town of Ansonia v. Cooper
neutral
1 sentence1994These acts must be done with the intent to ratify the prior action taken by the agent, see Hartford Accident Indemnity Co. v. South Windsor Bank and Trust Co. , 171 Conn. 63 , 72 (1976), relying on Ansonia v. Cooper , 64 Conn. 536 , 544 and Mataulis v. Gans , 107 Conn. 562 , 566 . | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Chieppo v. Chieppo
green
1 sentence1993A corporation can be held liable under certain circumstances for agreements or actions taken in its name prior to its actual legal incorporation, see Cramer v. Burnham, 107 Conn. 216 , Chieppo v. Chieppo, 88 Conn. 233 (1914), see generally Am.Jur.2d Volume 18, "Corporations" Section 120, pp. 939 et seq. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Cramer v. Burnham
green
1 sentence1993A corporation can be held liable under certain circumstances for agreements or actions taken in its name prior to its actual legal incorporation, see Cramer v. Burnham, 107 Conn. 216 , Chieppo v. Chieppo, 88 Conn. 233 (1914), see generally Am.Jur.2d Volume 18, "Corporations" Section 120, pp. 939 et seq. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.