regulatory taking claim (Connecticut) · Go Syfert
← Connecticut issues

regulatory taking claim in Connecticut

5 Connecticut opinions name it 1 courts 1992–2001 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Gil v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency green
conn · 1991
2 sentences

1992Id. 415 .

1992Gil v. Inland Wetlands Watercourses Agency, supra, 415 .

21992–1992
A & F Construction Co. v. Zoning Board of Appeals neutral
connappct · 2000
2 sentences

2001See Francini v. Zoning Board of Appeals , supra, 228 Conn. 794 -95 (affirming the trial court's ruling that the plaintiff failed to prove his taking claim because of his failure to demonstrate that "the board's denial of his application for a variance . . . has deprived him of any reasonable use of his property"); A F Construction Co. v. Zoning Board of Appeals , 60 Conn. App. 273 , CT Page 1231 279-80, 759 A.2d 101 (2000) (affirming the trial court's denial of the plaintiff's taking claim because the plaintiff failed to sustain its burden of proving that the zoning board would not allow "any

2001See Francini v. Zoning Board of Appeals , supra, 228 Conn. 794 -95 (affirming the trial court's ruling that the plaintiff failed to prove his taking claim because of his failure to demonstrate that "the board's denial of his application for a variance . . . has deprived him of any reasonable use of his property"); A F Construction Co. v. Zoning Board of Appeals , 60 Conn. App. 273 , CT Page 1231 279-80, 759 A.2d 101 (2000) (affirming the trial court's denial of the plaintiff's taking claim because the plaintiff failed to sustain its burden of proving that the zoning board would not allow "any

12001–2001
Smithfield Concerned Citizens for Fair Zoning v. The Town of Smithfield, Etc. green
ca1 · 1990
1 sentence

1999The Supreme Court held that a regulatory taking claim invoking either of the two clauses was unripe until the governmental entity charged with implementing the regulations had reached a final decision regarding the application of the regulations to the property at issue." Smithfield Concerned Citizens v. Town of Smithfield , 907 F.2d 239 , 241 (1st Cir. 1990).

11999–1999
Cioffoletti v. Planning & Zoning Commission green
conn · 1989
1 sentence

1995This matter appears to have been settled by the Supreme Court in Chioffoletti, 209 Conn. 544 (1989).

11995–1995

Where else courts name it

TX 21 (2007–2022) CA 13 (1990–2019) MA 9 (1992–2025) WI 6 (1988–1999) NY 6 (1992–2024) CT 5 (1992–2001) FL 4 (1990–2025) MT 4 (2008–2022) RI 4 (2009–2020) OR 4 (1993–1997) WA 4 (1995–2026) ME 3 (1993–2021) OH 3 (2007–2015) MI 3 (1989–2022) NJ 2 (2001–2007) ID 2 (2009–2013) CO 2 (2000–2025) MN 2 (1996–2009)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check