representation claim (Connecticut) · Go Syfert
← Connecticut issues

representation claim in Connecticut

5 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1983–2022 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Samuelsgreen
conn · 2005 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010
2 sentences

2010See State v. Samuels, 273 Conn. 541, 560 , 871 A.2d 1005 (2005) (“[m]erely placing a constitutional tag on a nonconstitutional claim does not make it so” [internal quotation marks omitted]); State v. Schiappa, 248 Conn. 132, 164 , 728 A.2d 466 (“a nonconstitutional claim cannot be transformed into a constitutional claim simply by virtue of the label placed upon it by a party”), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 862 , 120 S. Ct. 152 , 145 L.

2010See State v. Samuels, 273 Conn. 541, 560 , 871 A.2d 1005 (2005) (“[m]erely placing a constitutional tag on a nonconstitutional claim does not make it so” [internal quotation marks omitted]); State v. Schiappa, 248 Conn. 132, 164 , 728 A.2d 466 (“a nonconstitutional claim cannot be transformed into a constitutional claim simply by virtue of the label placed upon it by a party”), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 862 , 120 S. Ct. 152 , 145 L.

11
Hathaway v. Bornmanngreen
conn · 1950 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001
1 sentence

2001See Hathaway v. Bornman , 137 Conn. 322 , 324 , 767 A.2d 91 (1950) "Fraud is not to be presumed but must be proven by clear and satisfactory evidence." (Citations omitted.) Miller v. Appleby , 183 Conn. 51 , 55 (1981).

11
Miller v. Applebygreen
conn · 1981 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001
1 sentence

2001See Hathaway v. Bornman , 137 Conn. 322 , 324 , 767 A.2d 91 (1950) "Fraud is not to be presumed but must be proven by clear and satisfactory evidence." (Citations omitted.) Miller v. Appleby , 183 Conn. 51 , 55 (1981).

11
Finley v. Mansongreen
connappct · 1983 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999
1 sentence

1999In Finley, the court noted that the record showed no explanation of the charge by the trial court nor a representation by defense counsel that the nature of the offense CT Page 14419 had been explained to the accused, Finley v. Manson, supra, at 262.

11
Henderson v. Morgangreen
scotus · 1976 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1983–1983
2 sentences

1983See Henderson v. Morgan, 426 U.S. 637, 647 , 96 S. Ct. 2253 , 49 L.

1983See Henderson v. Morgan, 426 U.S. 637, 647 , 96 S. Ct. 2253 , 49 L.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (8)

CaseCitedYears
United States v. Lionel Ortiz green
cadc · 1996
2 sentences

2022The District of Columbia Circuit reasoned that it is ultimately defense counsel, not the trial court, who has the obligation to advise a defendant of his right to testify ‘‘in a manner that would enable the defendant to make a knowing and intelligent choice.’’ Id., 1070 . ‘‘This advice is crucial because there can be no effective waiver of a fundamental constitu- tional right unless there is an intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right or privilege.’’ (Empha- sis in original; internal quotation marks omitted.) United States v. Teague, supra, 953 F.2d 1533 .6 In the absence of

2022A per se rule requiring a canvass would ‘‘inappropriate[ly] [interfere] with the client-counsel relationship when the court can . . . readily determine from counsel whether the defendant has been properly advised.’’ (Emphasis added.) United States v. Ortiz, supra, 1071 .

12022–2022
State v. Taylor green
conn · 1996
2 sentences

2010See State v. Samuels, 273 Conn. 541, 560 , 871 A.2d 1005 (2005) ("[m]erely placing a constitutional tag on a nonconstitutional claim does not make it so" [internal quotation marks omitted]); State v. Schiappa, 248 Conn. 132, 164 , 728 A.2d 466 ("a nonconstitutional claim cannot be transformed into a constitutional claim simply by virtue of the label placed upon it by a party"), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 862 , 120 S.Ct. 152 , 145 L.Ed.2d 129 (1999); State v. Taylor, 239 Conn. 481, 502-503 , 687 A.2d 489 (1996) ("it would trivialize the constitution to transmute a nonconstitutional claim into a con

2010See State v. Samuels, 273 Conn. 541, 560 , 871 A.2d 1005 (2005) ("[m]erely placing a constitutional tag on a nonconstitutional claim does not make it so" [internal quotation marks omitted]); State v. Schiappa, 248 Conn. 132, 164 , 728 A.2d 466 ("a nonconstitutional claim cannot be transformed into a constitutional claim simply by virtue of the label placed upon it by a party"), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 862 , 120 S.Ct. 152 , 145 L.Ed.2d 129 (1999); State v. Taylor, 239 Conn. 481, 502-503 , 687 A.2d 489 (1996) ("it would trivialize the constitution to transmute a nonconstitutional claim into a con

12010–2010
State v. Schiappa green
conn · 1999
2 sentences

2010See State v. Samuels, 273 Conn. 541, 560 , 871 A.2d 1005 (2005) (“[m]erely placing a constitutional tag on a nonconstitutional claim does not make it so” [internal quotation marks omitted]); State v. Schiappa, 248 Conn. 132, 164 , 728 A.2d 466 (“a nonconstitutional claim cannot be transformed into a constitutional claim simply by virtue of the label placed upon it by a party”), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 862 , 120 S. Ct. 152 , 145 L.

2010See State v. Samuels, 273 Conn. 541, 560 , 871 A.2d 1005 (2005) (“[m]erely placing a constitutional tag on a nonconstitutional claim does not make it so” [internal quotation marks omitted]); State v. Schiappa, 248 Conn. 132, 164 , 728 A.2d 466 (“a nonconstitutional claim cannot be transformed into a constitutional claim simply by virtue of the label placed upon it by a party”), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 862 , 120 S. Ct. 152 , 145 L.

12010–2010
Stephen v. United States green
scotus · 1999
2 sentences

2010See State v. Samuels, 273 Conn. 541, 560 , 871 A.2d 1005 (2005) (“[m]erely placing a constitutional tag on a nonconstitutional claim does not make it so” [internal quotation marks omitted]); State v. Schiappa, 248 Conn. 132, 164 , 728 A.2d 466 (“a nonconstitutional claim cannot be transformed into a constitutional claim simply by virtue of the label placed upon it by a party”), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 862 , 120 S. Ct. 152 , 145 L.

2010See State v. Samuels, 273 Conn. 541, 560 , 871 A.2d 1005 (2005) ("[m]erely placing a constitutional tag on a nonconstitutional claim does not make it so" [internal quotation marks omitted]); State v. Schiappa, 248 Conn. 132, 164 , 728 A.2d 466 ("a nonconstitutional claim cannot be transformed into a constitutional claim simply by virtue of the label placed upon it by a party"), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 862 , 120 S.Ct. 152 , 145 L.Ed.2d 129 (1999); State v. Taylor, 239 Conn. 481, 502-503 , 687 A.2d 489 (1996) ("it would trivialize the constitution to transmute a nonconstitutional claim into a con

12010–2010
Rush v. Texas green
scotus · 1997
1 sentence

2010See State v. Samuels, 273 Conn. 541, 560 , 871 A.2d 1005 (2005) ("[m]erely placing a constitutional tag on a nonconstitutional claim does not make it so" [internal quotation marks omitted]); State v. Schiappa, 248 Conn. 132, 164 , 728 A.2d 466 ("a nonconstitutional claim cannot be transformed into a constitutional claim simply by virtue of the label placed upon it by a party"), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 862 , 120 S.Ct. 152 , 145 L.Ed.2d 129 (1999); State v. Taylor, 239 Conn. 481, 502-503 , 687 A.2d 489 (1996) ("it would trivialize the constitution to transmute a nonconstitutional claim into a con

12010–2010
Newman v. Worcester County Department of Social Services green
scotus · 1997
1 sentence

2010See State v. Samuels, 273 Conn. 541, 560 , 871 A.2d 1005 (2005) ("[m]erely placing a constitutional tag on a nonconstitutional claim does not make it so" [internal quotation marks omitted]); State v. Schiappa, 248 Conn. 132, 164 , 728 A.2d 466 ("a nonconstitutional claim cannot be transformed into a constitutional claim simply by virtue of the label placed upon it by a party"), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 862 , 120 S.Ct. 152 , 145 L.Ed.2d 129 (1999); State v. Taylor, 239 Conn. 481, 502-503 , 687 A.2d 489 (1996) ("it would trivialize the constitution to transmute a nonconstitutional claim into a con

12010–2010
McMillian v. Tate green
scotus · 1997
1 sentence

2010See State v. Samuels, 273 Conn. 541, 560 , 871 A.2d 1005 (2005) ("[m]erely placing a constitutional tag on a nonconstitutional claim does not make it so" [internal quotation marks omitted]); State v. Schiappa, 248 Conn. 132, 164 , 728 A.2d 466 ("a nonconstitutional claim cannot be transformed into a constitutional claim simply by virtue of the label placed upon it by a party"), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 862 , 120 S.Ct. 152 , 145 L.Ed.2d 129 (1999); State v. Taylor, 239 Conn. 481, 502-503 , 687 A.2d 489 (1996) ("it would trivialize the constitution to transmute a nonconstitutional claim into a con

12010–2010
Rentz v. Davis, Dir. Gen'l. green
· 1922
2 sentences

2010See State v. Samuels, 273 Conn. 541, 560 , 871 A.2d 1005 (2005) (“[m]erely placing a constitutional tag on a nonconstitutional claim does not make it so” [internal quotation marks omitted]); State v. Schiappa, 248 Conn. 132, 164 , 728 A.2d 466 (“a nonconstitutional claim cannot be transformed into a constitutional claim simply by virtue of the label placed upon it by a party”), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 862 , 120 S. Ct. 152 , 145 L.

2010See State v. Samuels, 273 Conn. 541, 560 , 871 A.2d 1005 (2005) ("[m]erely placing a constitutional tag on a nonconstitutional claim does not make it so" [internal quotation marks omitted]); State v. Schiappa, 248 Conn. 132, 164 , 728 A.2d 466 ("a nonconstitutional claim cannot be transformed into a constitutional claim simply by virtue of the label placed upon it by a party"), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 862 , 120 S.Ct. 152 , 145 L.Ed.2d 129 (1999); State v. Taylor, 239 Conn. 481, 502-503 , 687 A.2d 489 (1996) ("it would trivialize the constitution to transmute a nonconstitutional claim into a con

12010–2010

Where else courts name it

IL 55 (1894–2024) NY 43 (1898–2026) TX 26 (1974–2020) CA 20 (1972–2025) OH 19 (1995–2025) PA 19 (1981–2025) MD 10 (1911–2017) MS 8 (1884–2025) LA 7 (1978–2009) MI 5 (1924–2021) CT 5 (1983–2022) ND 5 (2023–2024) CO 4 (1985–2006) IN 4 (1878–2014) AL 4 (1891–1982) TN 4 (1908–2005) KS 4 (1935–2021) GA 3 (1991–1997) AK 3 (2014–2024) FL 3 (1988–2013) NJ 3 (1989–2010) AZ 3 (1977–1990) MO 3 (1936–1996) NM 3 (1990–1994) SD 2 (1984–1989) OR 2 (1919–1977) WI 2 (1995–2021)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check