5 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1983–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Samuelsgreen2 sentences2010See State v. Samuels, 273 Conn. 541, 560 , 871 A.2d 1005 (2005) (“[m]erely placing a constitutional tag on a nonconstitutional claim does not make it so” [internal quotation marks omitted]); State v. Schiappa, 248 Conn. 132, 164 , 728 A.2d 466 (“a nonconstitutional claim cannot be transformed into a constitutional claim simply by virtue of the label placed upon it by a party”), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 862 , 120 S. Ct. 152 , 145 L. 2010See State v. Samuels, 273 Conn. 541, 560 , 871 A.2d 1005 (2005) (“[m]erely placing a constitutional tag on a nonconstitutional claim does not make it so” [internal quotation marks omitted]); State v. Schiappa, 248 Conn. 132, 164 , 728 A.2d 466 (“a nonconstitutional claim cannot be transformed into a constitutional claim simply by virtue of the label placed upon it by a party”), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 862 , 120 S. Ct. 152 , 145 L. | 1 | 1 |
Hathaway v. Bornmanngreen1 sentence2001See Hathaway v. Bornman , 137 Conn. 322 , 324 , 767 A.2d 91 (1950) "Fraud is not to be presumed but must be proven by clear and satisfactory evidence." (Citations omitted.) Miller v. Appleby , 183 Conn. 51 , 55 (1981). | 1 | 1 |
Miller v. Applebygreen1 sentence2001See Hathaway v. Bornman , 137 Conn. 322 , 324 , 767 A.2d 91 (1950) "Fraud is not to be presumed but must be proven by clear and satisfactory evidence." (Citations omitted.) Miller v. Appleby , 183 Conn. 51 , 55 (1981). | 1 | 1 |
Finley v. Mansongreen1 sentence1999In Finley, the court noted that the record showed no explanation of the charge by the trial court nor a representation by defense counsel that the nature of the offense CT Page 14419 had been explained to the accused, Finley v. Manson, supra, at 262. | 1 | 1 |
Henderson v. Morgangreen2 sentences1983See Henderson v. Morgan, 426 U.S. 637, 647 , 96 S. Ct. 2253 , 49 L. 1983See Henderson v. Morgan, 426 U.S. 637, 647 , 96 S. Ct. 2253 , 49 L. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Lionel Ortiz
green
2 sentences2022The District of Columbia Circuit reasoned that it is ultimately defense counsel, not the trial court, who has the obligation to advise a defendant of his right to testify ‘‘in a manner that would enable the defendant to make a knowing and intelligent choice.’’ Id., 1070 . ‘‘This advice is crucial because there can be no effective waiver of a fundamental constitu- tional right unless there is an intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right or privilege.’’ (Empha- sis in original; internal quotation marks omitted.) United States v. Teague, supra, 953 F.2d 1533 .6 In the absence of 2022A per se rule requiring a canvass would ‘‘inappropriate[ly] [interfere] with the client-counsel relationship when the court can . . . readily determine from counsel whether the defendant has been properly advised.’’ (Emphasis added.) United States v. Ortiz, supra, 1071 . | 1 | 2022–2022 |
State v. Taylor
green
2 sentences2010See State v. Samuels, 273 Conn. 541, 560 , 871 A.2d 1005 (2005) ("[m]erely placing a constitutional tag on a nonconstitutional claim does not make it so" [internal quotation marks omitted]); State v. Schiappa, 248 Conn. 132, 164 , 728 A.2d 466 ("a nonconstitutional claim cannot be transformed into a constitutional claim simply by virtue of the label placed upon it by a party"), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 862 , 120 S.Ct. 152 , 145 L.Ed.2d 129 (1999); State v. Taylor, 239 Conn. 481, 502-503 , 687 A.2d 489 (1996) ("it would trivialize the constitution to transmute a nonconstitutional claim into a con 2010See State v. Samuels, 273 Conn. 541, 560 , 871 A.2d 1005 (2005) ("[m]erely placing a constitutional tag on a nonconstitutional claim does not make it so" [internal quotation marks omitted]); State v. Schiappa, 248 Conn. 132, 164 , 728 A.2d 466 ("a nonconstitutional claim cannot be transformed into a constitutional claim simply by virtue of the label placed upon it by a party"), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 862 , 120 S.Ct. 152 , 145 L.Ed.2d 129 (1999); State v. Taylor, 239 Conn. 481, 502-503 , 687 A.2d 489 (1996) ("it would trivialize the constitution to transmute a nonconstitutional claim into a con | 1 | 2010–2010 |
State v. Schiappa
green
2 sentences2010See State v. Samuels, 273 Conn. 541, 560 , 871 A.2d 1005 (2005) (“[m]erely placing a constitutional tag on a nonconstitutional claim does not make it so” [internal quotation marks omitted]); State v. Schiappa, 248 Conn. 132, 164 , 728 A.2d 466 (“a nonconstitutional claim cannot be transformed into a constitutional claim simply by virtue of the label placed upon it by a party”), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 862 , 120 S. Ct. 152 , 145 L. 2010See State v. Samuels, 273 Conn. 541, 560 , 871 A.2d 1005 (2005) (“[m]erely placing a constitutional tag on a nonconstitutional claim does not make it so” [internal quotation marks omitted]); State v. Schiappa, 248 Conn. 132, 164 , 728 A.2d 466 (“a nonconstitutional claim cannot be transformed into a constitutional claim simply by virtue of the label placed upon it by a party”), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 862 , 120 S. Ct. 152 , 145 L. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Stephen v. United States
green
2 sentences2010See State v. Samuels, 273 Conn. 541, 560 , 871 A.2d 1005 (2005) (“[m]erely placing a constitutional tag on a nonconstitutional claim does not make it so” [internal quotation marks omitted]); State v. Schiappa, 248 Conn. 132, 164 , 728 A.2d 466 (“a nonconstitutional claim cannot be transformed into a constitutional claim simply by virtue of the label placed upon it by a party”), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 862 , 120 S. Ct. 152 , 145 L. 2010See State v. Samuels, 273 Conn. 541, 560 , 871 A.2d 1005 (2005) ("[m]erely placing a constitutional tag on a nonconstitutional claim does not make it so" [internal quotation marks omitted]); State v. Schiappa, 248 Conn. 132, 164 , 728 A.2d 466 ("a nonconstitutional claim cannot be transformed into a constitutional claim simply by virtue of the label placed upon it by a party"), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 862 , 120 S.Ct. 152 , 145 L.Ed.2d 129 (1999); State v. Taylor, 239 Conn. 481, 502-503 , 687 A.2d 489 (1996) ("it would trivialize the constitution to transmute a nonconstitutional claim into a con | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Rush v. Texas
green
1 sentence2010See State v. Samuels, 273 Conn. 541, 560 , 871 A.2d 1005 (2005) ("[m]erely placing a constitutional tag on a nonconstitutional claim does not make it so" [internal quotation marks omitted]); State v. Schiappa, 248 Conn. 132, 164 , 728 A.2d 466 ("a nonconstitutional claim cannot be transformed into a constitutional claim simply by virtue of the label placed upon it by a party"), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 862 , 120 S.Ct. 152 , 145 L.Ed.2d 129 (1999); State v. Taylor, 239 Conn. 481, 502-503 , 687 A.2d 489 (1996) ("it would trivialize the constitution to transmute a nonconstitutional claim into a con | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Newman v. Worcester County Department of Social Services
green
1 sentence2010See State v. Samuels, 273 Conn. 541, 560 , 871 A.2d 1005 (2005) ("[m]erely placing a constitutional tag on a nonconstitutional claim does not make it so" [internal quotation marks omitted]); State v. Schiappa, 248 Conn. 132, 164 , 728 A.2d 466 ("a nonconstitutional claim cannot be transformed into a constitutional claim simply by virtue of the label placed upon it by a party"), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 862 , 120 S.Ct. 152 , 145 L.Ed.2d 129 (1999); State v. Taylor, 239 Conn. 481, 502-503 , 687 A.2d 489 (1996) ("it would trivialize the constitution to transmute a nonconstitutional claim into a con | 1 | 2010–2010 |
McMillian v. Tate
green
1 sentence2010See State v. Samuels, 273 Conn. 541, 560 , 871 A.2d 1005 (2005) ("[m]erely placing a constitutional tag on a nonconstitutional claim does not make it so" [internal quotation marks omitted]); State v. Schiappa, 248 Conn. 132, 164 , 728 A.2d 466 ("a nonconstitutional claim cannot be transformed into a constitutional claim simply by virtue of the label placed upon it by a party"), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 862 , 120 S.Ct. 152 , 145 L.Ed.2d 129 (1999); State v. Taylor, 239 Conn. 481, 502-503 , 687 A.2d 489 (1996) ("it would trivialize the constitution to transmute a nonconstitutional claim into a con | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Rentz v. Davis, Dir. Gen'l.
green
2 sentences2010See State v. Samuels, 273 Conn. 541, 560 , 871 A.2d 1005 (2005) (“[m]erely placing a constitutional tag on a nonconstitutional claim does not make it so” [internal quotation marks omitted]); State v. Schiappa, 248 Conn. 132, 164 , 728 A.2d 466 (“a nonconstitutional claim cannot be transformed into a constitutional claim simply by virtue of the label placed upon it by a party”), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 862 , 120 S. Ct. 152 , 145 L. 2010See State v. Samuels, 273 Conn. 541, 560 , 871 A.2d 1005 (2005) ("[m]erely placing a constitutional tag on a nonconstitutional claim does not make it so" [internal quotation marks omitted]); State v. Schiappa, 248 Conn. 132, 164 , 728 A.2d 466 ("a nonconstitutional claim cannot be transformed into a constitutional claim simply by virtue of the label placed upon it by a party"), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 862 , 120 S.Ct. 152 , 145 L.Ed.2d 129 (1999); State v. Taylor, 239 Conn. 481, 502-503 , 687 A.2d 489 (1996) ("it would trivialize the constitution to transmute a nonconstitutional claim into a con | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.