Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1963–1999 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Iturralde v. DEPT. OF PROF. REG.green2 sentences1995This model rule applies to the Department under section 120.54(10), Florida Statutes, and we hold that Beacon’s exceptions were timely under the rule. 2 Since it would be inappropriate for this court to pass on the merits of Beacon’s exceptions, Iturralde v. Department of Professional Regulation, 484 So.2d 1315, 1316 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), on remand it will be incumbent upon the Department to consider them. 1995This model rule applies to the Department under section 120.54(10), Florida Statutes, and we hold that Beacon’s exceptions were timely under the rule. 2 Since it would be inappropriate for this court to pass on the merits of Beacon’s exceptions, Iturralde v. Department of Professional Regulation, 484 So.2d 1315, 1316 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), on remand it will be incumbent upon the Department to consider them. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Beacon Finance, Inc. v. Department of Insurance, State of Florida
green
2 sentences1999This model rule applies to the Department under section 120.54(10), Florida Statutes, and we hold that Beacon's exceptions were timely under the rule. 656 So.2d at 198-99 . 1999This model rule applies to the Department under section 120.54(10), Florida Statutes, and we hold that Beacon's exceptions were timely under the rule. 656 So.2d at 198-99 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Citizens of Florida v. Mayo
green
1 sentence1988This section states in pertinent part that "the appropriate model rules shall be the rules of procedure for each agency subject to this act to the extent that each agency does not adopt a specific rule of procedure covering the subject matter contained in the model rules applicable to that agency." See also Citizens of Florida v. Mayo, 357 So.2d 731 (Fla. 1978); Broward County Classroom Teachers Ass'n, Inc. v. Public Emp. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
United States v. Melvin Telfaire
green
2 sentences1978The requested instruction was not taken from the Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases in use in this state, but rather from a model instruction derived from United States v. Telfaire, 152 U.S.App.D.C. 146 , 469 F.2d 552 (1972). 1978The requested instruction was not taken from the Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases in use in this state, but rather from a model instruction derived from United States v. Telfaire, 152 U.S.App.D.C. 146 , 469 F.2d 552 (1972). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
United States v. Hayman
green
2 sentences1963Appeal time shall be that governing criminal appeals A helpful discussion of the background of the federal statute, which was the model for our rule, is presented by the opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States, in United States v. Hayman, 342 U.S. 205 , 72 S.Ct. 263 , 96 L.Ed. 232 . 1963Appeal time shall be that governing criminal appeals A helpful discussion of the background of the federal statute, which was the model for our rule, is presented by the opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States, in United States v. Hayman, 342 U.S. 205 , 72 S.Ct. 263 , 96 L.Ed. 232 . | 1 | 1963–1963 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.