occupation claim (Florida) · Go Syfert
← Florida issues

occupation claim in Florida

5 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1918–1983 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Liddon v. Hodnett green
fla · 1886
2 sentences

1983Liddon v. Hodnett, 22 Fla. 442 (1886).

1983Liddon v. Hodnett, 22 Fla. 442 (1886).

21983–1983
Dobbs v. Sea Isle Hotel green
fla · 1952
1 sentence

1965On the other hand, subsection (2) mentions the word "business" three times but does not once mention the word "profession" or, for that matter, the word "trade." The portion of that subsection relied on by the appellant here is expressly connected with the operation of a business — such portion providing that an employee may, under certain specified circumstances, agree with his employer "to refrain from carrying on or engaging in a similar business * * *." *790 Inasmuch as subsection (1) of Section 542.12 is made expressly applicable to a lawful "profession, trade or business" and subsection

11965–1965
American Can Co. v. City of Tampa green
fla · 1942
1 sentence

1950In that case we stated: "If the business is one that does not involve public health, comfort, safety, morals or welfare, an excise tax for inspecting and regulating cannot be imposed, but it is nevertheless subject to an occupation tax for raising revenue, barring constitution exemption." [ 152 Fla. 798 , 14 So.2d 210 ] (Italics supplied) Although the privilege of engaging in business may be classified as a species of property, it is not property in the usual, customary and commonly accepted sense of the word.

11950–1950
Farmers and Mechanics Sav. Bank of Minneapolis v. Minnesota green
scotus · 1914
1 sentence

1918Bank of Minneapolis v. State of Minnesota, 232 U. S. 516 , 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 354, the court said: “A Federal instrumentality acting under Congressional authority cannot be subjected to an occupation or privilege tax by a State.” The petitioner is not only a Federal but a Military instrumentality acting under the orders of the Commanding Officer of Camp Joseph E.

11918–1918

Where else courts name it

AL 12 (1885–2003) PA 6 (1949–1986) IL 6 (1953–1987) FL 5 (1918–1983) CO 4 (1966–1991) WI 2 (1906–1917) WA 2 (2010–2010) IN 2 (1912–1953) NM 2 (1972–1978) AR 2 (2001–2011) TX 2 (1922–1959) MN 2 (1901–1981) OR 2 (1946–1952) ME 2 (1935–1936)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check