Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1978–2004 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Dist. Ct. of Appeal, First Dist.green1 sentence1994See State v. District Court of Appeal, First District, 569 So.2d 439 (Fla. 1990). | 1 | 1 |
In Re Advisory Opinion to Governorgreen1 sentence1982Advisory Opinion to Governor Request of June 29, 1979, 374 So.2d 959, 964 (Fla. 1979); Lewis v. Florida State Board of Health, 143 So.2d 867, 869 (Fla.1st DCA 1962). | 1 | 1 |
Lewis v. Florida State Board of Healthgreen1 sentence1982Advisory Opinion to Governor Request of June 29, 1979, 374 So.2d 959, 964 (Fla. 1979); Lewis v. Florida State Board of Health, 143 So.2d 867, 869 (Fla.1st DCA 1962). | 1 | 1 |
Schroeder v. Dayton-Hudson Corp.green1 sentence1982In Connecticut that state's Supreme Court identified a state action requirement in the Connecticut Constitution [6] in Lockwood v. Killian, 172 Conn. 496 , 375 A.2d 998, 1001-1004 (1977); see also, Schroeder v. Dayton-Hudson Corp., 448 F. Supp. 910, 915 (E.D.Mich. 1978) (Mich.Const. art. | 1 | 1 |
Holy Spirit Ass'n for the Unification of World Christianity v. New York State Congress of Parents & Teachers, Inc.green2 sentences1982I, § 2, equal protection clause has state action requirement) and Holy Spirit Association for Unification of World Christianity v. New York State Congress of Parents and Teachers, Inc., 95 Misc.2d 548 , 408 N.Y.S.2d 261, 265 (Sup.Ct. 1982I, § 2, equal protection clause has state action requirement) and Holy Spirit Association for Unification of World Christianity v. New York State Congress of Parents and Teachers, Inc., 95 Misc.2d 548 , 408 N.Y.S.2d 261, 265 (Sup.Ct. | 1 | 1 |
Harley v. Schuylkill Countygreen1 sentence1982See, Harley v. Schuykill County, 476 F. Supp. 191, 195 (E.D.Pa. 1979); Erdman v. Mitchell, 207 Pa. 79 , 56 A. 327 (1903). [4] While Article I, Section 2 is self-executing, the appellant's position would not be assisted if there is a state action requirement that he could not satisfy. | 1 | 1 |
Lockwood v. Killiangreen2 sentences1982In Connecticut that state's Supreme Court identified a state action requirement in the Connecticut Constitution [6] in Lockwood v. Killian, 172 Conn. 496 , 375 A.2d 998, 1001-1004 (1977); see also, Schroeder v. Dayton-Hudson Corp., 448 F. Supp. 910, 915 (E.D.Mich. 1978) (Mich.Const. art. 1982In Connecticut that state's Supreme Court identified a state action requirement in the Connecticut Constitution [6] in Lockwood v. Killian, 172 Conn. 496 , 375 A.2d 998, 1001-1004 (1977); see also, Schroeder v. Dayton-Hudson Corp., 448 F. Supp. 910, 915 (E.D.Mich. 1978) (Mich.Const. art. | 1 | 1 |
Pomponio v. Claridge of Pompano Condominiumgreen1 sentence1982"Yet such rulings have long been considered helpful and persuasive, and are obviously entitled to great weight." Pomponio v. Claridge of Pompano Condominium, 378 So.2d 774, 779 (Fla. 1979). [5] Our review of the reported decisions reveals that in each and every instance that the Florida Equal Protection Clause has been invoked, there has been at least some state action present. | 1 | 1 |
Cantor v. Detroit Edison Co.green1 sentence1978See Cantor v. Detroit Edison Company, 428 U.S. 579 , 600 (1976). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Parker v. Brown
green
2 sentences2004The relevant principles have been summarized by the United States Supreme Court as follows: The starting point in any analysis involving the state action doctrine is the reasoning of Parker v. Brown [, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943)]. 2004The relevant principles have been summarized by the United States Supreme Court as follows: The starting point in any analysis involving the state action doctrine is the reasoning of Parker v. Brown [, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943)]. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Flagg Bros., Inc. v. Brooks
green
2 sentences1996Further, "As a matter of substantive constitutional law the state-action requirement reflects judicial recognition of the fact that `most rights secured by the Constitution are protected only against infringement by governments.' " Id.; Flagg Brothers, Inc. v. Brooks, 436 U.S. 149, 156 , 98 S.Ct. 1729, 1733 , 56 L.Ed.2d 185 (1978). 1996Further, "As a matter of substantive constitutional law the state-action requirement reflects judicial recognition of the fact that `most rights secured by the Constitution are protected only against infringement by governments.' " Id.; Flagg Brothers, Inc. v. Brooks, 436 U.S. 149, 156 , 98 S.Ct. 1729, 1733 , 56 L.Ed.2d 185 (1978). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Civil Rights Cases
green
2 sentences1982The state action requirement has its roots in The Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 3 , 3 S.Ct. 18 , 27 L.Ed. 835 (1883). 1982The state action requirement has its roots in The Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 3 , 3 S.Ct. 18 , 27 L.Ed. 835 (1883). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Osborne v. Adams County
green
2 sentences1982The state action requirement has its roots in The Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 3 , 3 S.Ct. 18 , 27 L.Ed. 835 (1883). 1982The state action requirement has its roots in The Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 3 , 3 S.Ct. 18 , 27 L.Ed. 835 (1883). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Erdman v. Mitchell
green
2 sentences1982See, Harley v. Schuykill County, 476 F. Supp. 191, 195 (E.D.Pa. 1979); Erdman v. Mitchell, 207 Pa. 79 , 56 A. 327 (1903). [4] While Article I, Section 2 is self-executing, the appellant's position would not be assisted if there is a state action requirement that he could not satisfy. 1982See, Harley v. Schuykill County, 476 F. Supp. 191, 195 (E.D.Pa. 1979); Erdman v. Mitchell, 207 Pa. 79 , 56 A. 327 (1903). [4] While Article I, Section 2 is self-executing, the appellant's position would not be assisted if there is a state action requirement that he could not satisfy. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.
green
2 sentences1982Therefore, it seems apparent to us that Article I, Section 2 of the 1968 Florida Constitution, in its present form, was intended to have a "state action" requirement, and that the last sentence of the section specifically identifies three "suspect *717 classes," including race, religion and physical handicap. [8] Assuming there is a state action requirement, we are required to determine whether there has been a demonstration of state action in this case. "[T]he question whether particular conduct is `private,' on the one hand, or `state action,' on the other, frequently admits of no easy answe 1982Therefore, it seems apparent to us that Article I, Section 2 of the 1968 Florida Constitution, in its present form, was intended to have a "state action" requirement, and that the last sentence of the section specifically identifies three "suspect *717 classes," including race, religion and physical handicap. [8] Assuming there is a state action requirement, we are required to determine whether there has been a demonstration of state action in this case. "[T]he question whether particular conduct is `private,' on the one hand, or `state action,' on the other, frequently admits of no easy answe | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.