Garcia defense (Georgia) · Go Syfert
← Georgia issues

Garcia defense in Georgia

5 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1996–2024 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

CaseFollowedCited
Lankford v. Stategreen
gactapp · 2009 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
2 sentences

2013As such, the notion that Garcia was somehow prejudiced by an evidentiary showing made by the State against Calderon strains credulity and can in 30 Lankford v. State, 295 Ga. App. 590, 592 (1) ( 672 SE2d 534 ) (2009) (holding that trial court did not err in denying defendant’s motion to sever when number of defendants was sufficiently small so as to minimize the danger of confusion). 31 Jones v. State, 318 Ga. App. 26, 36 (5) ( 733 SE2d 72 ) (2012) (holding that defendants’ defenses were not antagonistic to one another when both completely denied participating in shooting). 32 See, e.g., White

2013As such, the notion that Garcia was somehow prejudiced by an evidentiary showing made by the State against Calderon strains credulity and can in 30 Lankford v. State, 295 Ga. App. 590, 592 (1) ( 672 SE2d 534 ) (2009) (holding that trial court did not err in denying defendant’s motion to sever when number of defendants was sufficiently small so as to minimize the danger of confusion). 31 Jones v. State, 318 Ga. App. 26, 36 (5) ( 733 SE2d 72 ) (2012) (holding that defendants’ defenses were not antagonistic to one another when both completely denied participating in shooting). 32 See, e.g., White

11
Jones v. Stategreen
gactapp · 2012 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
2 sentences

2013As such, the notion that Garcia was somehow prejudiced by an evidentiary showing made by the State against Calderon strains credulity and can in 30 Lankford v. State, 295 Ga. App. 590, 592 (1) ( 672 SE2d 534 ) (2009) (holding that trial court did not err in denying defendant’s motion to sever when number of defendants was sufficiently small so as to minimize the danger of confusion). 31 Jones v. State, 318 Ga. App. 26, 36 (5) ( 733 SE2d 72 ) (2012) (holding that defendants’ defenses were not antagonistic to one another when both completely denied participating in shooting). 32 See, e.g., White

2013As such, the notion that Garcia was somehow prejudiced by an evidentiary showing made by the State against Calderon strains credulity and can in 30 Lankford v. State, 295 Ga. App. 590, 592 (1) ( 672 SE2d 534 ) (2009) (holding that trial court did not err in denying defendant’s motion to sever when number of defendants was sufficiently small so as to minimize the danger of confusion). 31 Jones v. State, 318 Ga. App. 26, 36 (5) ( 733 SE2d 72 ) (2012) (holding that defendants’ defenses were not antagonistic to one another when both completely denied participating in shooting). 32 See, e.g., White

11
White v. Stategreen
gactapp · 2012 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
2 sentences

2013As such, the notion that Garcia was somehow prejudiced by an evidentiary showing made by the State against Calderon strains credulity and can in 30 Lankford v. State, 295 Ga. App. 590, 592 (1) ( 672 SE2d 534 ) (2009) (holding that trial court did not err in denying defendant’s motion to sever when number of defendants was sufficiently small so as to minimize the danger of confusion). 31 Jones v. State, 318 Ga. App. 26, 36 (5) ( 733 SE2d 72 ) (2012) (holding that defendants’ defenses were not antagonistic to one another when both completely denied participating in shooting). 32 See, e.g., White

2013As such, the notion that Garcia was somehow prejudiced by an evidentiary showing made by the State against Calderon strains credulity and can in 30 Lankford v. State, 295 Ga. App. 590, 592 (1) ( 672 SE2d 534 ) (2009) (holding that trial court did not err in denying defendant’s motion to sever when number of defendants was sufficiently small so as to minimize the danger of confusion). 31 Jones v. State, 318 Ga. App. 26, 36 (5) ( 733 SE2d 72 ) (2012) (holding that defendants’ defenses were not antagonistic to one another when both completely denied participating in shooting). 32 See, e.g., White

11
Baranco, Inc. v. Bradshawgreen
gactapp · 1995 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996
2 sentences

1996See Baranco, Inc. v. Bradshaw, 217 Ga. App. 169, 171 (1) ( 456 SE2d 592 ) (1995).

1996See Baranco, Inc. v. Bradshaw, 217 Ga. App. 169, 171 (1) ( 456 SE2d 592 ) (1995).

11
Drane v. Stategreen
ga · 1995 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996
2 sentences

1996The trial court properly admitted these photographs, over Garcia’s objection that this evidence was “irrelevant and unnecessarily prejudicial.” Drane v. State, 265 Ga. 255, 260 (10) ( 455 SE2d 27 ) (1995). 4.

1996The trial court properly admitted these photographs, over Garcia’s objection that this evidence was “irrelevant and unnecessarily prejudicial.” Drane v. State, 265 Ga. 255, 260 (10) ( 455 SE2d 27 ) (1995). 4.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Crowder v. State of Georgia green
ga · 2020
2 sentences

2024In Crowder v. State, 309 Ga. 66 (844 SE2d 806) (2020), we addressed whether OCGA § 9-16-12 (b) (3) permits service of process by publication in the first instance on owners or interest holders who reside out of state.

2024In Crowder v. State, 309 Ga. 66 (844 SE2d 806) (2020), we addressed whether OCGA § 9-16-12 (b) (3) permits service of process by publication in the first instance on owners or interest holders who reside out of state.

12024–2024
Harris v. State green
gactapp · 1998
2 sentences

1999Harris v. State, 234 Ga. App. 126 (1) ( 505 SE2d 49 ) (1998).

1999Harris v. State, 234 Ga. App. 126 (1) ( 505 SE2d 49 ) (1998).

11999–1999

Where else courts name it

TX 99 (1964–2025) CA 62 (1985–2026) FL 17 (1986–2023) NM 11 (1980–2022) CO 10 (1986–2025) IL 8 (1979–2024) NY 8 (1995–2022) MI 7 (1978–1995) PA 7 (2004–2021) UT 7 (1993–2025) NE 7 (1990–2024) WA 7 (1991–2019) GA 5 (1996–2024) AZ 5 (2007–2022) IA 4 (1999–2024) MS 4 (2008–2023) NV 4 (1975–2013) DC 3 (2013–2023) ID 3 (2014–2019) LA 2 (2002–2011) OH 2 (2022–2024) IN 2 (1997–2014) HI 2 (2001–2012) ND 2 (2004–2004) KS 2 (2007–2012) MO 2 (2012–2013)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check