Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1978–1995 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Garciagreen2 sentences1985People v Garcia, supra, 264. 1985People v Garcia, supra, 264. | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Degraffenreid
green
2 sentences1994Instead, the Court merely explained that the defendant’s contention that he was denied a fair trial under either People v Degraffenreid, 19 Mich App 702 ; 173 NW2d 317 (1969), or Beasley v United States, 491 F2d 687, 696 (CA 6, 1974), was unfounded. 1994Instead, the Court merely explained that the defendant’s contention that he was denied a fair trial under either People v Degraffenreid, 19 Mich App 702 ; 173 NW2d 317 (1969), or Beasley v United States, 491 F2d 687, 696 (CA 6, 1974), was unfounded. | 3 | 1981–1994 |
McAvoy v. H B Sherman Co.
green
2 sentences1995The motion continued that § 315 11 provides *23 that all fees and charges for treatment were subject to the health care services rules, that those rules provide for resolving disputes between carriers and health care providers, 12 and that rule 1904(6), 13 concerning the continuation of medical *24 benefits during an appeal, provides for expedited treatment accorded to sixty-day cases when a carrier files an application to stop or limit its liability. 14 The wcac, on August 30, 1991, denied the motion for remand and consolidation or to hold in abeyance, and granted Garcia’s motion to dismiss t 1995The motion continued that § 315 11 provides *23 that all fees and charges for treatment were subject to the health care services rules, that those rules provide for resolving disputes between carriers and health care providers, 12 and that rule 1904(6), 13 concerning the continuation of medical *24 benefits during an appeal, provides for expedited treatment accorded to sixty-day cases when a carrier files an application to stop or limit its liability. 14 The wcac, on August 30, 1991, denied the motion for remand and consolidation or to hold in abeyance, and granted Garcia’s motion to dismiss t | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Strickland v. Washington
green
2 sentences1987Having met the Garcia standard, counsel also met the less stringent test of Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668 ; 104 S Ct 2052 ; 80 L Ed 2d 674 (1984), reh den 467 US 1267 ; 104 S Ct 3562 ; 82 L Ed 2d 864 (1984). 1987Having met the Garcia standard, counsel also met the less stringent test of Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668 ; 104 S Ct 2052 ; 80 L Ed 2d 674 (1984), reh den 467 US 1267 ; 104 S Ct 3562 ; 82 L Ed 2d 864 (1984). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.
green
2 sentences1987Having met the Garcia standard, counsel also met the less stringent test of Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668 ; 104 S Ct 2052 ; 80 L Ed 2d 674 (1984), reh den 467 US 1267 ; 104 S Ct 3562 ; 82 L Ed 2d 864 (1984). 1987Having met the Garcia standard, counsel also met the less stringent test of Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668 ; 104 S Ct 2052 ; 80 L Ed 2d 674 (1984), reh den 467 US 1267 ; 104 S Ct 3562 ; 82 L Ed 2d 864 (1984). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
People v. Coyle
green
2 sentences1985The court shall not require or threaten to require the jury to deliberate for an unreasonable length of time or for unreasonable intervals. "(c) The jury may be discharged without having agreed upon a verdict if it appears that there is no reasonable probability of agreement.” 2 In People v Coyle, 104 Mich App 636, 639 ; 305 NW2d 275 (1981), lv den 415 Mich 851 (1982), we summarized the Garcia test as follows: "The first branch of the inquiry focuses on the Sixth Amendment right to counsel, for which the Supreme Court has endorsed the standard established in Beasley v United States, 491 F2d 68 1985The court shall not require or threaten to require the jury to deliberate for an unreasonable length of time or for unreasonable intervals. "(c) The jury may be discharged without having agreed upon a verdict if it appears that there is no reasonable probability of agreement.” 2 In People v Coyle, 104 Mich App 636, 639 ; 305 NW2d 275 (1981), lv den 415 Mich 851 (1982), we summarized the Garcia test as follows: "The first branch of the inquiry focuses on the Sixth Amendment right to counsel, for which the Supreme Court has endorsed the standard established in Beasley v United States, 491 F2d 68 | 1 | 1985–1985 |
People v. Qualls
green
2 sentences1978To the extent that the case of People v Qualls, 9 Mich App 689 ; 158 NW2d 60 (1968), holds to the contrary, it is expressly overruled.” (Emphasis in original.) Applying the Garcia standard here, we find that the trial court properly denied the motion. 1978To the extent that the case of People v Qualls, 9 Mich App 689 ; 158 NW2d 60 (1968), holds to the contrary, it is expressly overruled.” (Emphasis in original.) Applying the Garcia standard here, we find that the trial court properly denied the motion. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.